天眼評分
TradeSmart
https://tradesmartonline.in/
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
C
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
暫未查證到有效監管資訊,請注意風險!
- 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效外匯監管,請注意風險!
瀏覽TradeSmart 的用戶還瀏覽了..
Vantage
HANTEC MARKETS
STARTRADER
搜索來源
投放語言
市場分析
素材投放
官網鑒定
tradesmartonline.in
104.28.6.119伺服器所在地美國
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間2013-04-02網站名稱WHOIS.INREGISTRY.NET所屬公司GODADDY.COM, LLC (R101-AFIN)
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| TradeSmart評論摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 2013 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 印度 |
| 監管 | 無監管 |
| 交易工具 | 股票、期貨、期權、貨幣和商品 |
| 產品 | TradeSmart 手機應用程式、TradeSmart 桌面版、TradeSmart 網頁版、TradeSmart API、BOX、TradeSmart MF、Instaoption 和整合 |
| 槓桿 | 最高達1:5 |
| 點差 | / |
| 交易平台 | TraderSmart APP |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客戶支援 | 電話:+91 022-61208000 |
| 電郵:contactus@vnsfin. com | |
| 社交媒體:Facebook、Twitter、Instagram、LinkedIn、YouTube、Telegram | |
| 地址:印度孟買安德烈里東馬洛A-401,郵編400059 | |
TradeSmart 資訊
成立於2013年,總部設於印度的TradeSmart是一家金融服務提供商。該公司提供多樣化的交易工具和平台,包括TradeSmart手機應用程式、TradeSmart桌面版、TradeSmart網頁版、TradeSmart API、BOX、TradeSmart MF、Instaoption 和整合。為了滿足不同客戶的需求,該公司設有兩種帳戶類型:價值帳戶適用於低頻率和小型交易者,而權力帳戶適用於高頻率和高交易量的交易者。
然而,TradeSmart目前沒有受到監管,其合法性令人擔憂。

優缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 提供多樣化產品 | 無監管 |
| 帳戶功能資訊有限 | |
| 費用結構不清晰 | |
| 存款和提款資訊有限 |
TradeSmart 是否合法?
編號 TradeSmart 未受監管,交易者在交易時必須小心。


TraderSmart 可以交易什麼?
| 交易工具 | 支援 |
| 股票 | ✔ |
| 期貨 | ✔ |
| 期權 | ✔ |
| 貨幣 | ✔ |
| 大宗商品 | ✔ |
| 指數 | ❌ |
| 加密貨幣 | ❌ |
| 債券 | ❌ |
| 交易基金 | ❌ |
產品
TraderSmart 的產品包括各種交易工具:TradeSmart 手機應用程式、TradeSmart 桌面版、TradeSmart 網頁版、TradeSmart API、BOX、TradeSmart MF、Instaoption 和整合。

帳戶類型與費用
TradeSmart 為交易者提供 Demat 帳戶 進行交易。有兩種不同的方案可供選擇:Value 和 Power。
Demat 帳戶的主要作用是將證券的存儲、管理和交易數位化,為投資者提供高效、安全和透明的投資體驗。
以下是兩種帳戶方案的資訊:
| Value 帳戶 | Power 帳戶 | |
| 目標交易者 | 低交易量、高頻率交易者 | 高交易量、高價值交易者 |
| 佣金費用 | 0.007% | ₹15 每筆訂單(不論交易大小或類型) |
| 當日現金、期貨、貨幣 | 適合低交易量、高頻率交易 | 適合高交易量、高價值交易 |
| 大宗商品 > 0.007%、交割 > 0.07%、期權 > ₹7 每手 | 支持低成本大宗商品和期權交易 | 支持高成本大宗商品和期權交易 |
| 槓桿 | 最高 1:5(股票、F&O、貨幣和大宗商品) | 最高 1:5(股票、F&O、貨幣和大宗商品) |
| 股票抵押支援 | 是 | 是 |
| 最低承諾 | 否 | 否 |

槓桿
TradeSmart 在股票、期權、貨幣和大宗商品上擁有 1:5 的槓桿。請注意,高槓桿不僅可以放大利潤,還可能放大損失。

交易平台
TradeSmart 支持使用專有的 TraderSmart APP 進行交易。在該平台上進行交易只收取每筆 Rs. 15 作為佣金。
| 交易平台 | 支援 | 可用設備 | 適合對象 |
| TraderSmart | ✔ | 桌面、手機、網頁 | / |
| MT4 | ❌ | / | 初學者 |
| MT5 | ❌ | / | 經驗豐富的交易者 |

存款和提款
TraderSmart 接受通過 銀行電匯和 NEFT 轉帳 進行付款。
以下列出支援的共有 29 間銀行:
Axis Bank、Bank of Baroda、Bank of India、Bank of Maharashtra、Capital Small Financec Bank、Catholic Syrian Bank、City Union Bank、Deutsche Bank、Dhanlaxmi Bank、Federal Bank、HDFC Bank、IDFC First Bank、ICICI Bank、Indian Bank、Indian Overseas Bank、Indusined Bank、Jammu and Kashmir Bank、Karnataka Bank、Karur Vysya Bank、Kotak Mahindra Bank、Lakshmi Vilas Bank、Punjab National Bank、Saraswat Bank、State Bank of India、Tamilnad Mercantile Bank、Union Bank of India、YES Bank 和 AU Small Finance Bank。
企業畫像
- 5-10年
- 監管牌照存疑
- 自研
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
Can you tell me what the typical spread is for EUR/USD when using a standard account with TradeSmart?
In my experience as a trader looking into brokers, transparency around costs—especially spreads on major pairs like EUR/USD—is absolutely crucial. When assessing TradeSmart, I found their disclosure around spreads to be quite limited. According to the information available, TradeSmart focuses mainly on Indian equity, F&O, and commodities, but does support currency trading. However, there is no explicit information regarding the typical spreads for EUR/USD or for standard accounts in general. From my perspective, this lack of clear data raises potential concerns. With reputable brokers, I expect concrete details about spreads as it determines a major part of trading costs, particularly for active strategies. The only indication of trading costs at TradeSmart relates to their fixed commission of ₹15 per order, rather than variable spreads, and their platform does not appear to offer the widely-used MT4 or MT5 where such information is usually more standardized. For me, this uncertainty is a red flag: without verified spread information, it is not possible to accurately estimate total trading expenses. Given that TradeSmart is unregulated and there are gaps in fee disclosures, I approach this broker with significant caution. If locked-in, transparent spreads on EUR/USD are critical for your strategy, I honestly recommend that you request specific details directly from TradeSmart before proceeding or consider other brokers with established reputations and fully disclosed trading conditions. Careful due diligence is imperative to control risk in such environments.
In what ways does TradeSmart’s regulatory status help safeguard my money?
Speaking from my experience as a forex trader, regulatory oversight is one of the most important factors I consider when evaluating a broker. In the case of TradeSmart, I did not find any evidence of regulation by a recognized financial authority. This lack of regulation is particularly concerning to me, as it means there are no external agencies monitoring TradeSmart’s operations, risk management practices, or client fund protections. Regulatory bodies are designed to enforce critical safeguards such as segregation of client funds, transparent pricing, dispute resolution, and minimum capital requirements. Without such oversight, I believe that my funds could be more exposed to operational risks or even potential misconduct on the broker’s part. From a risk management perspective, even if TradeSmart offers a modern platform and a variety of trading products, the absence of regulatory supervision leaves me with unresolved questions about what protections exist if something goes wrong—such as insolvency or withdrawal issues. Additionally, the single user complaint I came across about withdrawal problems only adds to these worries. Personally, I feel much more secure trading with brokers that are firmly regulated and whose practices are subject to frequent audits. In summary, in my judgment, TradeSmart’s regulatory status does not offer any meaningful safeguards for my money, and for me, that is a non-trivial consideration in broker selection.
Considering both user feedback and your own assessment, how legitimate do you believe TradeSmart is?
Having traded in various markets for years, I always assess legitimacy through a strict lens of regulation, transparency, and user experience. In the case of TradeSmart, I have significant reservations. The most immediate concern for me is the lack of regulatory oversight—TradeSmart is not regulated by any recognized authority. This is flagged clearly in their profile, and, for me, operating without regulation inherently exposes traders to added risks regarding fund security, dispute resolution, and operational transparency. Despite their seemingly mature suite of trading platforms and a variety of instruments including stocks, futures, options, currencies, and commodities, the risks posed by their unregulated status outweigh these positives in my judgment. The unclear fee structure, limited details around account features, and ambiguities concerning deposits and withdrawals contribute further to my cautious stance. User feedback also gave me pause; a report details the inability to withdraw funds and a complete loss of deposit, which is a red flag from a trader's perspective. In my experience, even one such unresolved case is enough for deep concern given the financial stakes involved. While TradeSmart may cater well to some traders with its proprietary technology, the totality of evidence leads me to question its legitimacy and avoid engagement given the potential risks to capital and absence of regulatory safeguards.
Is TradeSmart overseen by any regulatory bodies, and if so, which financial authorities are responsible for its regulation?
In my experience as a forex trader, I pay close attention to regulation before trusting any broker with my funds. From my thorough review of TradeSmart, I must stress that this broker is not overseen by any recognized regulatory body. Although TradeSmart has been active for several years and offers a range of trading tools and account types, there is no evidence of a valid license from any financial authority, whether in India or internationally. Personally, I find the absence of regulation troubling. Oversight from an established regulator acts as a safeguard against unethical practices and ensures that client funds are handled with some degree of transparency and security. Without that independent supervision, the risk to traders—both in terms of financial safety and recourse in a dispute—increases significantly. For me, trading with an unregulated broker such as TradeSmart is simply not an option I would consider, no matter how polished the platform or competitive the fees. From a risk management standpoint, I urge other traders to exercise extreme caution. Regulated brokers are held to standards designed to protect investors; TradeSmart, in its current unregulated state, cannot provide that crucial layer of trust. In summary, TradeSmart operates without any formal regulatory oversight, and this is a serious red flag from a safety perspective in my professional opinion.
你要評價的內容
請輸入...




