天眼評分
Phillip Securities Group · 輝立証券集團
http://www.poems.com.hk/zh-hk
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
B
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
持牌機構:Phillip Commodities (HK) Limited
監管證號:AAZ038
單核
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 當前資料顯示,該交易商無交易軟件,請注意風險!
瀏覽Phillip Securities Group 輝立証券集團 的用戶還瀏覽了..
EC Markets
HANTEC MARKETS
搜索來源
投放語言
市場分析
素材投放
官網鑒定
poems.com.hk
210.177.196.135伺服器所在地香港
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區香港
功能變數名稱創建時間--網站名稱WHOIS.HKIRC.HK所屬公司-
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| 輝立証券集團 評論摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 1975 |
| 註冊地區 | 新加坡 |
| 監管 | SFC |
| 市場工具 | 證券、期貨、外匯、債券、ETF、保險 |
| 模擬帳戶 | ❌ |
| 交易平台 | Hulit City Online、Hulit City Mobile、Stock Easy (SATS)、Options Easy (OATS)、Futures Trading (FATS) |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客戶支援 | 電話:(852) 2277 6555 |
| 傳真:(852) 2277 6008 | |
| 電郵:cs@phillip.com.hk | |
輝立証券集團 資訊
成立於1975年,總部設於新加坡,輝立証券集團 是一家多元資產金融服務公司,受香港SFC監管。其自家交易系統提供完整的投資選擇,包括期貨、外匯、股票、債券和基金產品。儘管平台功能和帳戶多樣性良好,但目前缺乏模擬帳戶或伊斯蘭帳戶。

優缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 香港SFC許可 | 沒有模擬帳戶或伊斯蘭帳戶 |
| 廣泛的產品範圍涵蓋本地和海外市場 | 部分海外交易收取高最低佣金 |
| 多個定製交易平台,滿足不同需求 | 未明確提及最低存款 |
輝立証券集團 是否合法?
根據牌照號碼AAZ038,輝立証券集團 受香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會(SFC)監管,自2003年12月9日起獲准進行期貨合約和槓桿外匯交易。

我可以在 輝立証券集團 交易什麼?
包括證券、期貨、外匯、債券、保險和資本管理解決方案,包括管理基金和ETF,Phillip Securities提供全面的投資和財富管理服務。
| 交易工具 | 支援 |
| 證券 | ✔ |
| 期貨 | ✔ |
| 外匯 | ✔ |
| 債券 | ✔ |
| ETF | ✔ |
| 保險 | ✔ |
| 大宗商品 | ❌ |
| 指數 | ❌ |
| 股票 | ❌ |
| 加密貨幣 | ❌ |
| 期權 | ❌ |

帳戶類型
Phillip Securities (HK) Ltd. 提供兩種主要的實時交易帳戶:保證金帳戶和托管帳戶。 該公司沒有模擬帳戶或伊斯蘭帳戶。

輝立証券集團 費用
對於網上和日內交易,輝立証券集團的費用通常公平且符合行業標準。它為大多數客戶免除了保管費,並在選定的項目上提供零佣金交易。另一方面,某些外國市場交易,特別是通過電話或低交易量的交易,可能會有較高的最低費用。
| 市場/產品 | 佣金 | 印花稅 | 交易徵費 | 交易費 | CCASS/其他費用 | 保管費 |
| 港股(網上) | 0.08%(買入 ≤ HKD 30K:$0,日內交易:0.05%) | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01%(最低 HKD 3,最高 HKD 300) | 豁免(<5000手) |
| 認股證及牛熊證 | 0.03% 日內交易 / 0.05% 超過 HKD 50K | 無 | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01%(最低 HKD 3,最高 HKD 300) | 豁免(<5000手) |
| 人民幣雙重計價股票 | 網上:0.08%(最低 CNY 60);電話:0.25%(最低 CNY 100) | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01%(最低 CNY 3,最高 CNY 300) | 豁免(<5000手) |
| 美股(網上) | USD 0.0099/股(最低 USD 1);電話:0.25%(最低 USD 20) | 無 | SEC + FINRA + DTC費用適用 | 包括在內 | SEC/FINRA/DTC結算費用 | ❌ |
| 中國A股(北向) | 買入 ≤ ¥30K:¥0;買入 > ¥30K 或賣出:0.03%(網上) | 0.05%(僅限賣出) | 處理費 0.00341%,管理費 0.002% | ChinaClear 0.001% | 通過CCASS的0.002% | 每日投資組合價值 × 0.008%/365 |

交易平台
| 交易平台 | 支援 | 可用設備 | 適合對象 |
| 華立城網上 | ✔ | 桌面 / 網頁 | 需要完整功能的股票和期貨交易者 |
| 華立城手機版 | ✔ | 手機(iOS/Android) | 在外出時進行股票交易 |
| 股票易(SATS) | ✔ | 桌面 | 初學者股票交易者 |
| 期權易(OATS) | ✔ | 桌面 | 期權交易者 |
| 期貨交易(FATS) | ✔ | 桌面 | 期貨交易者 |

企業畫像
- 20年以上
- 香港監管
- 期貨合約交易&槓桿式外匯交易
- 中級風險隱患
Wiki問答
How legitimate do you believe Phillip Securities Group is, considering available reviews and your own assessment?
In my years of trading and evaluating brokers, legitimacy is always my foremost concern, especially with firms handling leveraged forex and multi-asset products. Phillip Securities Group stands out to me as a well-established entity, having operated for more than 20 years and holding regulation under the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). That SFC license (No. AAZ038) grants it the authority to deal in futures and leveraged foreign exchange trading, which I view as a reassuring foundation since the SFC is one of Asia’s more respected regulatory bodies. For me, regulatory transparency and comprehensive product offerings are critical; Phillip Securities delivers both, presenting a range that spans forex, stocks, funds, and more. That said, I exercise caution with any broker, even one with a long operational history. A few operational points draw my prudent attention: the absence of demo accounts limits my ability to trial their unique platforms risk-free, and their fee structure—especially for certain overseas trades—may carry higher minimums, which could impact lower-volume or cost-sensitive traders. I noticed user sentiment is generally neutral to positive, though it appears limited. For me, the lack of widespread negative exposure or regulatory infractions over two decades lends credibility, but I always maintain vigilance. Overall, Phillip Securities Group meets my basic trust requirements, but I advise anyone to approach with the same thorough due diligence I apply to any financial intermediary.
How do Phillip Securities Group’s swap fees (overnight financing costs) stack up against those of competing brokers?
Drawing from my personal trading experience and the data available, I have not found specific details about Phillip Securities Group’s swap fees (overnight financing costs) disclosed openly. This lack of transparent information on overnight charges raises important considerations for any serious forex trader like myself, since financing costs can materially affect my overall returns on leveraged positions held overnight. When evaluating any broker, I place a premium on clarity and upfront disclosure, particularly on variable costs like swaps. Compared to many global brokers who publish their swap rates or at least provide easy access to typical overnight financing rates, Phillip Securities Group falls short in this aspect. While the broker is solidly regulated by the Hong Kong SFC and offers competitive trading commissions and a wide suite of products, I find the omission of explicit swap fee information limiting for precise cost assessment. In my experience, other major brokers in the region and internationally will usually offer both published reference swap rates and responsive customer support to clarify these costs upon request. For me, this means I would approach overnight leveraged trading through Phillip Securities Group with extra caution. Before committing to significant overnight exposure, I would personally insist on contacting their support and requesting a clear breakdown of applicable swap rates for relevant instruments. This is a crucial step to avoid surprises, as overnight charges can subtly erode profits. Transparency on such key fees remains a deciding factor for my long-term trust and trading comfort with any brokerage.
How do the different account types at Phillip Securities Group compare to each other?
From my experience evaluating Phillip Securities Group, their account offerings are notably focused, with only two main types available: the Margin Account and the Custodian Account. When comparing these, I notice each serves quite distinct trading needs, so as a trader, it's essential to match your trading style and requirements to what they offer. The Margin Account provides access to leveraged trading, which is essential if you intend to trade futures or leveraged forex products. Leveraged trading can enhance potential returns but also substantially increases risk, so it’s suitable only for traders who are knowledgeable and understand risk controls. In my case, when seeking more tactical and active short-term strategies, the Margin Account would be the necessary choice. The Custodian Account, by comparison, is tailored more toward those who want a straightforward approach without leverage, prioritizing asset safekeeping and possibly a more passive trading style. For me, this would fit when my primary goal is secure holding of investments over the medium to long term, rather than frequent trading or complex leveraged strategies. I do find the lack of demo and Islamic accounts to be limiting. Demo accounts are especially valuable for testing platforms or strategies risk-free before committing funds. Their absence means new users need to proceed more cautiously. Overall, the decision between account types at Phillip Securities Group, in my view, hinges on whether leverage and active strategies are central to your trading approach, or whether you value simplicity and safety in asset custody more highly.
Are there any inactivity fees imposed by Phillip Securities Group, and under what circumstances do they apply?
Drawing from my experience as a cautious forex trader, I pay close attention to fee structures, especially hidden costs like inactivity fees. With Phillip Securities Group, I carefully reviewed the available information regarding charges but found no explicit mention of inactivity fees. Their detailed fee listings cover brokerage, stamp duty, transaction levies, and custody fees for various markets, but do not reference any penalties for account dormancy or inaction. That said, the absence of this specific fee in the broker’s disclosures doesn’t automatically guarantee it’s never imposed; sometimes terms regarding maintenance or inactivity are clarified within the client agreement or during the actual onboarding process. Given Phillip Securities Group’s long-standing reputation, SFC regulation, and emphasis on transparent trading costs, my expectation is that any such fees would be openly disclosed. Even so, I would never assume exemption without verification. My practice—especially with multi-asset brokers—is to ask their support team directly or obtain written confirmation before leaving an account idle for an extended time. This kind of direct check is essential for responsible trading and long-term fund preservation. So, while there is no clear evidence suggesting that Phillip Securities Group imposes inactivity fees, I believe prudent traders should confirm this detail with the broker before proceeding. This step minimizes potential surprises and ensures a fully informed trading experience.
你要評價的內容
請輸入...
