天眼評分
Renaissance Capital
http://www.rencap.com/
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
C
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
持牌機構:Renaissance Securities (Cyprus) Ltd
監管證號:053/04
單核
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- WikiFX總共收到對該交易商的用戶投訴已高達6條,請注意風險,謹防受害!
瀏覽Renaissance Capital 的用戶還瀏覽了..
CPT Markets
AVATRADE
搜索來源
投放語言
市場分析
素材投放
官網鑒定
rencap.com
40.67.195.43伺服器所在地荷蘭
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間1995-12-05網站名稱WHOIS.NETWORKSOLUTIONS.COM所屬公司NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| Renaissance Capital 評論摘要 | |
| 成立日期 | 1995-12-05 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 塞浦路斯 |
| 監管機構 | 受監管 |
| 業務 | 投資銀行、全球市場/頂級經紀。 |
| 客戶支援 | 電話:+ 357(22)505 800 |
| 傳真:+ 357(22)676 755 | |
| 電子郵件:info@rencap.eu | |
Renaissance Capital 資訊
Renaissance Capital 是一家獲得CYSEC許可的投資銀行。該公司在《銀行家》雜誌的年度“2020年投資銀行獎”中被評為“歐洲新興市場投資銀行年度”和“可持續獨立投資銀行年度”。該公司有三個核心業務領域,包括投資銀行、全球市場和頂級經紀。

Renaissance Capital 是否合法?
塞浦路斯證券交易委員會(CYSEC)根據許可證號053/04和許可證類型市場製造(MM)對Renaissance Capital進行監管,這比無監管更安全。


Renaissance Capital 的業務是什麼?
投資銀行部門通過結合國際和本地專業知識,為客戶提供獨特的解決方案,包括併購、股權資本市場、債務資本市場和定制融資。
股權資本市場提供主要的股權和股權相關產品、貨幣化和結構化解決方案。
債務資本市場專注於本地和國際債券,為負債管理、融資和對沖提供咨詢和債務重組解決方案,還包括為企業和主權客戶提供負債管理和信用評級咨詢服務。
併購專門為企業、金融投資者和股東提供關於大型和複雜交易、併購、重組、剝離、私有化交易、管理層收購、槓桿收購和其他情況的咨詢。
全球市場區域為法人實體、金融機構和高資產淨值個人提供定制服務。
頂級經紀區域允許客戶使用該公司的全球市場能力,以及為與Renaissance Capital開設經紀帳戶的客戶專享的額外福利。
WikiFX 上關於 Renaissance Capital 的負面評論
在WikiFX上,“曝光”是從用戶那裡收到的口碑。
客戶在交易無監管平台之前必須審查信息並評估風險。請咨詢我們的平台以獲取相關詳情。在我們的曝光部分舉報詐騙經紀人,我們的團隊將努力解決您遇到的任何問題。

多位用戶表示,該公司和GHC有同一所有人。 GHC欺騙了他們,無法提款。這將引起一些安全擔憂。您可以訪問:https://www.wikifx.com/en/comments/detail/202401199212973915.html https://www.wikifx.com/en/comments/detail/202207146672596195.html https://www.wikifx.com/en/comments/detail/202205315752526357.html。
企業畫像
- 20年以上
- 賽普勒斯監管
- 全牌照(MM)
- 展業區域存疑
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
Is a free demo account available with Renaissance Capital, and if so, does it come with any restrictions such as a time limit?
In my research and direct experience with Renaissance Capital, I have not found clear evidence that a free demo account is available to individual traders, nor explicit information about any restrictions or time limits that might apply if such an option existed. Renaissance Capital positions itself primarily as an investment bank with a strong focus on investment banking, global markets, and institutional brokerage services—rather than serving traditional retail forex traders looking for standard demo environments. While the firm operates under Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CYSEC) oversight and maintains a long-standing presence, I noticed the absence of retail-driven features like demo accounts advertised on their public materials. This stands out because demo accounts are a common tool for retail-focused brokers, offering potential clients a risk-free way to evaluate trading platforms and conditions. With Renaissance Capital, there is a significant emphasis on serving legal entities and high-net-worth individuals, which may explain the lack of accessible demo account information and raises questions about whether a standard demo feature is supported at all. Given the high-risk warnings and multiple user reports of previous withdrawal issues and rebranding concerns, I would urge fellow traders to exercise extra caution and obtain direct confirmation from the broker’s customer service before depositing any funds. This step ensures clarity and mitigates unnecessary risk, particularly if you are seeking a platform to practice trading through a demo environment. For my own trading needs, this lack of transparency would be a red flag and prompt me to look elsewhere if a demo account is a priority.
In what ways does Renaissance Capital's regulatory standing help safeguard my money?
In my experience as a forex trader, I always take a broker’s regulatory status seriously, since this is central to protecting my capital and ensuring a fair trading environment. Renaissance Capital is regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CYSEC), which means the company must adhere to set financial standards, operational practices, and client protection policies. In theory, this sort of regulation obliges the broker to keep client funds segregated from its own working capital—an important buffer against misuse of deposits. However, as I dug deeper, I noticed some significant concerns raised by previous clients about the integrity and transparency of Renaissance Capital, including troubling allegations of withdrawal issues and links to other problematic platforms. Although CYSEC is a recognized regulator and its oversight reduces some risks compared to unregulated brokers, no regulator can absolutely eliminate the potential for misconduct. For me, this situation underscores the importance of not relying solely on the presence of regulation but also examining the broker’s reputation and reported user experiences before entrusting them with any funds. Regulation is an important layer of defense, but comprehensive due diligence is always essential for safeguarding your money.
How would you assess the trustworthiness of Renaissance Capital, considering both reviews and your own evaluation?
As an experienced forex trader, I approach every broker with a healthy degree of skepticism and a careful risk assessment. In evaluating Renaissance Capital, several factors weigh heavily on my decision-making process. While the company holds a Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CYSEC) license and has been operating for more than 20 years, I find it crucial to dig deeper than regulatory status alone, especially when user reports suggest significant issues. My primary concern stems from repeated negative reviews, particularly allegations that Renaissance Capital is connected to GHC—a platform that, according to users, has a history of non-processed withdrawals and rebranding after alleged scams. In trading, the inability to withdraw funds or clear evidence of past misconduct is a serious red flag, regardless of any awards or apparent regulatory oversight. Personally, the potential for overlap with a previously exposed platform raises notable questions about transparency and operational integrity. Furthermore, reports of a "suspicious scope of business" and "high potential risk," combined with first-hand accounts of unresolved problems and transformation from other entities, mean that I would adopt a highly cautious stance. Even though regulatory status can provide a safety net, it is not always sufficient protection against operational malpractice. My professional judgement compels me to avoid platforms where there is ongoing uncertainty about the legitimacy and safety of client funds. For me, trustworthiness hinges not just on formal regulation, but also on a consistent track record of treating clients fairly—and this is where Renaissance Capital currently falls short in my evaluation.
Does Renaissance Capital charge a commission per lot for its ECN or raw spread accounts?
Based on my careful review of the available details regarding Renaissance Capital, I see that information about specific trading accounts—such as ECN or raw spread accounts—and the commission structure per lot is not directly provided. The broker is identified as a market maker and holds a CYSEC license in Cyprus, which does offer a measure of regulatory oversight. However, clear and transparent fee schedules, especially regarding commissions per lot for ECN or raw spread accounts, are notably absent. For me as a trader, this lack of transparency is a significant concern. In my experience, reputable brokers typically disclose their commission structures upfront, particularly if they offer ECN or raw account types, where commissions are usually charged per lot to make up for tighter spreads. The fact that none of this essential information is readily available, coupled with substantial negative feedback from users claiming prior issues with account withdrawals and platform transitions, increases my caution. Ultimately, without explicit confirmation of the commission per lot for ECN or raw accounts, I cannot verify Renaissance Capital's fee arrangement with confidence. This would lead me to be extremely cautious before considering any trading activity, especially given the potential risks highlighted by former users and the importance of fee transparency in trading decisions.
用戶評價 7
你要評價的內容
請輸入...













陈超10370
香港
是GHC转变来的,老板是黄贤荣,马来西亚人,假平台,不让出金,入金的时候宣称钱在澳新银行独立账户上,受监管,都是骗人的
爆料
羽翼&小辉43644
香港
希望外汇平台不要包庇这家公司,这原本就GHC,只是从新包装一下,既然承诺退钱为什么不承诺。
爆料
羽翼&小辉43644
香港
GHC去年9月跑路 到现在无法出金,大家看看截图。
爆料
羽翼&小辉
香港
都说你跟GHC 有关联 确实 骗了那么多人钱
爆料
A天蓝蓝(牙医)
香港
从GHC又变成这个交易商,骗子还在继续骗,坑死了中国的投资者,
爆料
A天蓝蓝(牙医)
香港
9月四号同时网站打不开,紧接着GHC就变成了这个交易商,骗子
爆料
壞丫头
香港
换了马甲的骗子。。就是之前的GHC。。
爆料