天眼評分
SOCIETE GENERALE
https://wholesale.banking.societegenerale.com/en/
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
A
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
暫未查證到有效監管資訊,請注意風險!
- 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效外匯監管,請注意風險!
瀏覽SOCIETE GENERALE 的用戶還瀏覽了..
Vantage
官網鑒定
societegenerale.com
149.126.74.215伺服器所在地英國
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間2000-06-05網站名稱WHOIS.CORPORATEDOMAINS.COM所屬公司CSC CORPORATE DOMAINS, INC.
關係族譜
公司簡介
| SOCIETE GENERALE 評論摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 2000 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 中國 |
| 監管 | 無監管 |
| 交易產品 | 股票、股票衍生品、貨幣 |
| 模擬帳戶 | / |
| 槓桿 | / |
| 點差 | / |
| 交易平台 | / |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客戶支援 | 社交媒體:LinkedIn、Twitter、YouTube |
| 地址:法國巴黎75009號29大道豪斯曼 | |
SOCIETE GENERALE 資訊
SOCIETE GENERALE 成立於2000年,並在中國註冊。提供廣泛的證券服務,包括股票和衍生品、固定收益和外匯、結算服務、托管服務和流動性管理。
儘管聲稱受法國ACPR監管,但實際上並未受到監管。投資者應對基金安全和透明度保持警惕。該公司通過多個渠道與客戶互動,包括LinkedIn、Twitter和YouTube,但缺乏有關存款、提款和其他重要信息的詳細說明。

優缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 提供多種產品和服務 | 無監管 |
| 收費結構不清晰 | |
| 沒有存款和提款信息 | |
| 沒有直接聯絡渠道 |
SOCIETE GENERALE 是否合法?
儘管 SOCIETE GENERALE 聲稱受ACPR監管,但實際上並未受到監管。交易者在交易時應保持警惕。



產品和服務
SOCIETE GENERALE 提供全面的證券服務,涵蓋股票和股票衍生品、固定收益和貨幣、首席服務和結算、量化投資策略、伯恩斯坦現金股票交易和股票研究、跨資產研究、跨資產解決方案、積極影響金融、SG市場、結算服務、托管和受託服務、零售托管服務、流動性管理、基金管理、資產服務、基金分銷、全球發行人服務。
| 產品 | 可用 |
| 股票 | ✔ |
| 股票衍生品 | ✔ |
| 貨幣 | ✔ |
| 大宗商品 | ❌ |
| 指數 | ❌ |
| 加密貨幣 | ❌ |
| 債券 | ❌ |
| 期權 | ❌ |
| ETFs | ❌ |

企業畫像
- 2-5年
- 監管牌照存疑
- 全球展業
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
What is the smallest sum I’m allowed to withdraw in a single transaction from my SOCIETE GENERALE account?
As someone who approaches every broker with a focus on transparency and fund safety, I find it concerning that SOCIETE GENERALE does not provide any clear information about deposit or withdrawal procedures, including minimum thresholds. In my personal experience, when I cannot easily locate specifics on withdrawal limits from a broker’s official channels or disclosures, that raises a red flag about operational transparency. Importantly, according to the information available, SOCIETE GENERALE lacks valid regulatory oversight, which to me makes the absence of these details even riskier. For my own trading and financial decision-making, I consider it essential that brokers openly state their withdrawal policies, including the smallest amount allowed per transaction. The unavailability of this information means I cannot accurately answer your question about minimum withdrawal sums. I would strongly advise anyone considering this broker to seek alternative providers that are both properly regulated and fully transparent about their transaction terms. Not knowing the withdrawal minimum, especially from an unregulated entity, may put your funds at undue risk. In my view, only accounts with clear, trustworthy policies are worth my consideration.
Can you use Expert Advisors (EAs) for automated trading on SOCIETE GENERALE’s platforms?
Based on my careful review of the available information, I do not see any confirmation that SOCIETE GENERALE offers a trading platform compatible with Expert Advisors or supports automated trading features. As someone who has relied on EAs for systematic trading in the past, the first criteria I look for is clear disclosure about trading platforms—such as MT4 or MT5—which are essential for running EAs. SOCIETE GENERALE's WikiFX profile does not indicate support for MetaTrader or any other platform well known for automated strategies. Furthermore, there is a concerning lack of detail regarding the broker’s account specifics, software environment, or even fundamental aspects like spreads, leverage, or deposit/withdrawal procedures. In my experience, transparency about operational details is vital for trust and risk management—especially with automation. More critically, SOCIETE GENERALE is not regulated and is flagged for potential high risk and suspicious business scope. In the world of forex trading—especially where automation is involved—relying on an unregulated entity exposes a trader’s capital to heightened risk, with limited recourse in the event of issues. For me, this lack of regulatory backing alone would be a decisive reason not to pursue any form of automated trading or EA integration with this broker, regardless of the technical support for EAs. My priority is always capital security and broker reliability, and in this case, I would remain on the sidelines.
In what ways does SOCIETE GENERALE’s regulatory status help safeguard my funds?
In my experience as a forex trader, the regulatory status of a broker is one of the most critical indicators of fund security and operational transparency. With SOCIETE GENERALE, I noted an immediate concern because, while the broker claims to be regulated by the French ACPR, current information specifically states it is not regulated. As such, there are no valid regulatory protections in place that would typically safeguard client funds, such as obligatory segregation of client assets, regular audits, or compensation schemes in case of insolvency. This absence of regulation is significant. For me, regulation isn’t just a formality—it serves to enforce standards, monitor business practices, and, ultimately, provide a recourse for traders if issues arise. I find that without this external oversight, it’s difficult to verify compliance regarding handling of deposits, withdrawals, or dispute resolution. This is compounded by the lack of clarity on SOCIETE GENERALE’s fee structures and no transparent details about their processes for deposit and withdrawal. Given the absence of active regulation and the warnings regarding potential high risk, I personally would treat engaging with SOCIETE GENERALE with a high degree of caution. Until there is clear, verified regulatory oversight, I view my funds as being exposed to unnecessary risk compared to trading with a regulated broker. This is a crucial consideration for anyone prioritizing the safety of their trading capital.
Can you tell me the typical spread for EUR/USD when trading on a standard account with SOCIETE GENERALE?
As someone who always places risk management and transparency at the top of my priorities, I find myself treading very carefully when considering SOCIETE GENERALE for forex trading. At this time, I have not found any validated or official information about the typical spread for EUR/USD on a standard account with them. The absence of these essential trading details is a red flag for me, especially considering that knowledge of the spread is fundamental to evaluating trading costs and comparing brokers. What's more concerning is that SOCIETE GENERALE, despite its corporate size and reputation in other financial sectors, operates in the forex space without any verified regulatory oversight according to my research. The lack of clear, accessible information on core aspects like spreads, deposit and withdrawal conditions, as well as the warning about a suspicious regulatory license, means I cannot establish the level of trust necessary to commit my own funds. For me, reliable data on spreads, especially for major pairs like EUR/USD, needs to come from a fully regulated broker that provides transparent trading conditions. In SOCIETE GENERALE’s case, until they can present clear, regulated, and publicly accessible trading terms, I would personally refrain from opening or funding an account or making any trading decisions based on assumptions about their spreads.
你要評價的內容
請輸入...
