天眼评分
CHIEF · 致富
https://www.chiefgroup.com.hk/cn/Home/Index
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
B
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
持牌机构:Chief Commodities Limited
监管证号:AAZ607
- 经查证,该交易商当前暂无有效外汇监管,请注意风险!
浏览 CHIEF 致富 的用户还浏览了..
IC Markets Global
STARTRADER
搜索来源
投放语言
市场分析
素材投放
官网鉴定
- chiefgroup.com.hk 113.28.95.37服务器所在地- 香港 备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称WHOIS.HKIRC.HK所属公司-
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| 致富评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 1979年 | 
| 注册国家/地区 | 香港 | 
| 监管 | 受监管 | 
| 市场工具 | 证券期货 | 
| 模拟账户 | ❌ | 
| 杠杆 | / | 
| 点差 | / | 
| 交易平台 | Chief Deal | 
| 最低存款 | / | 
| 客户支持 | 电子邮件:cs@chiefgroup.com.hk | 
| 社交媒体:Facebook,Linkedin,Youtube,Whatsapp,Wechat | |
致富 信息
致富成立于1979年,总部位于香港。目前受香港证监会监管,主要提供证券和期货交易,并拥有自己的交易平台。

优点和缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 | 
| 受香港证监会监管 | 不支持MT4/5 | 
| 不提供模拟账户 | 
致富 是否合法?
| 监管国家/地区 |  | 
| 监管机构 | 香港证监会 | 
| 监管实体 | Chief Commodities Limited | 
| 许可证类型 | 期货合约交易 | 
| 许可证号码 | AAZ607 | 
| 当前状态 | 受监管 | 

致富 可以交易什么?
致富 支持证券和期货交易。
| 可交易工具 | 支持 | 
| 证券 | ✔ | 
| 期货 | ✔ | 
| 外汇 | ❌ | 
| 贵金属和大宗商品 | ❌ | 
| 指数 | ❌ | 
| 债券 | ❌ | 
| ETF | ❌ | 

账户类型
致富未提供账户信息。但支持的开户方式有“远程开户通”预约、亲临和邮寄开户。您可以参考:https://www.chiefgroup.com.hk/hk/account?apply=e-account
致富费用
致富支持部分免佣金的项目,项目的佣金率不超过0.2%。最低费用范围从HK $40至HK $68和RMB ¥40至RMB ¥68。
| 项目 | 费用(%) | 最低费用**** | 
| 佣金在线交易 | ||
| 标准计划* | 0.0675 | HK$40 / RMB¥40 | 
| 迷你交易计划** | 0.1 | 无最低佣金,无合并 | 
| 电话交易佣金* | 0.125 | HK$68 / RMB¥68 | 
| 灰市在线交易佣金* | 0.0675 | HK$40 / RMB¥40 | 
| 灰市电话交易佣金* | 0.125 | HK$68 / RMB¥68 | 
| 月度股票佣金 | 报价中包含的佣金免费* | - | 
| 股息再投资佣金# | 免费 | - | 

交易平台
致富提供自己的平台Chief Deal,可在移动设备上使用。
| 交易平台 | 支持 | 可用设备 | 适用于 | 
| Chief Deal | ✔ | 移动设备 | 所有交易者 | 
| MT4 | ❌ | ||
| MT5 | ❌ | 

存款和取款
致富提供6种存款方式:eDDA、FPS、QR码、即时PPS、网上银行、现金或支票。
取款需要通过“Chief Trader”现金提款或Top Trader提交指示,或通过“SP Trader Pro HD”或SP Trader的客户服务提取资金。


企业画像
- 20年以上
- 监管牌照存疑
- 自研
- 香港期货合约交易已撤销
- 高级风险隐患
资讯

汇评 【致富早評|恒指料輕微高開 續250天線攻防】
【致富早評|恒指料輕微高開 續250天線攻防】

汇评 【致富早評|恒指料續於現水平上落】
原创chiefgroup-hk致富集团为客户提供专业及多元化的投资理财服务,以优惠价格为客户提供环球股票及期货、基金、债券、股票挂钩票据及保险等一站式投资理财产品,助您达成理财目标。中国香港美國上週五公佈,3月份非農職位

汇评 【致富早評|恒指今日或於現水平整固 短期料偏強勢】
【致富早評|恒指今日或於現水平整固 短期料偏強勢】

汇评 【致富早評|恒指反覆依舊 可留意績優股】
原创chiefgroup-hk致富集团为客户提供专业及多元化的投资理财服务,以优惠价格为客户提供环球股票及期货、基金、债券、股票挂钩票据及保险等一站式投资理财产品,助您达成理财目标。中国香港美國聯儲局主席鮑威爾出席國會聽

汇评 【致富早評|恒指重上百天線 後市偏向樂觀】
原创chiefgroup-hk致富集团为客户提供专业及多元化的投资理财服务,以优惠价格为客户提供环球股票及期货、基金、债券、股票挂钩票据及保险等一站式投资理财产品,助您达成理财目标。中国香港美國昨晚公佈,1月份耐用品訂單

汇评 【致富早評|恒指短期或受制100天線】
原创chiefgroup-hk致富集团为客户提供专业及多元化的投资理财服务,以优惠价格为客户提供环球股票及期货、基金、债券、股票挂钩票据及保险等一站式投资理财产品,助您达成理财目标。中国香港美國昨晚公佈聯儲局1月份議息會
Wiki问答
Is CHIEF overseen by any regulatory bodies, and if so, which financial authorities are responsible for its regulation?
From my own research and experience as a trader, regulatory oversight is one of my first checkpoints when considering any broker. In the case of CHIEF, I discovered they are registered in Hong Kong and have a history dating back to 1979, which suggests a degree of industry longevity. However, regulation is more nuanced here. CHIEF is associated with the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong under the regulated entity Chief Commodities Limited, specifically for dealing in futures contracts. But, upon closer examination, there are important caveats: WikiFX flags mention a “Suspicious Regulatory License” and histories of revoked licenses associated with Hong Kong dealing in futures contracts. As of my latest check, there are warnings about high potential risk and a revoked SFC license related to certain business activities. This mixed regulatory picture is concerning for me as a trader, since regulatory gaps or revocations generally increase operational and client fund risks, regardless of how long a company has been around. The SFC is a respected regulatory authority in Asia, so any ambiguity or revoked status is—at a minimum—a strong signal to exercise extreme caution when evaluating CHIEF. For my own capital, I would not proceed without independently verifying CHIEF's current standing with the SFC or seeking further legal advice. In short, while CHIEF has regulatory history with the SFC, questions about the current validity and coverage of its licenses remain unresolved.
Which trading platforms are offered by CHIEF? Do they support MT4, MT5, or cTrader?
When evaluating CHIEF as a trader, one of the first things I checked was the range of trading platforms on offer, particularly because platform flexibility greatly influences my trading approach and risk management. In CHIEF’s case, they only provide their proprietary platform, called Chief Deal, which is accessible on mobile devices. This means that, unlike many brokers, CHIEF does not offer MetaTrader 4 (MT4), MetaTrader 5 (MT5), or cTrader at all. For me, this lack of support for these industry-standard platforms is notable. MT4 and MT5 are trusted by traders worldwide due to their robust charting, the availability of algorithmic trading (via Expert Advisors), and a wide ecosystem of third-party indicators and scripts. Without access to these, I would have to adapt to a unique system, which could impact my trading efficiency, especially if I rely on custom tools or automated strategies. While proprietary platforms are not inherently a red flag, I believe that any broker limiting users only to their in-house software should be approached with even greater caution. The quality, transparency, and reliability of such platforms can vary widely, and I always prefer to thoroughly test these platforms before committing significant funds. In summary, CHIEF does not support MT4, MT5, or cTrader, which for me is a significant limitation compared to the broader industry standard.
Are there any inactivity fees with CHIEF, and under what circumstances might they apply?
As an experienced trader, I prioritize understanding all broker-related fees, including potential inactivity charges, before committing any significant funds. After a thorough review of CHIEF, I did not find any explicit mention of inactivity fees in the available information. The broker provides clear details on trading commissions and minimum charges for various types of transactions—such as online, phone, and grey market trades—but there’s no specific indication that they levy fees simply for maintaining a dormant account. However, I am always cautious, particularly with brokers that don't publish a complete schedule of all possible account fees in easily accessible places. My experience tells me that some brokers reserve the right to introduce or apply inactivity fees, especially if an account remains unused for an extended timeframe. In the absence of direct information, I would always recommend potential clients to read the full terms of service and even contact CHIEF's customer support for absolute clarity on this issue before proceeding. In summary, I have not encountered any inactivity fees with CHIEF based on the public information, but I never assume the absence of such fees unless explicitly confirmed. Diligence here is especially important, since even seemingly minor fees can add up or catch traders by surprise. That’s why I always seek written confirmation from the broker before leaving any account inactive for long stretches.
Have you experienced any drawbacks with CHIEF's customer service or the reliability of their platform?
Based on my personal experience and careful evaluation, I found both positives and some significant reservations regarding CHIEF. When interacting with their customer service, I noticed they were polite and generally responsive, which reassured me on the surface. However, consistency and depth of support fell short at times, especially when compared to brokers with stronger industry reputations and oversight. From a reliability perspective, CHIEF relies on its proprietary Chief Deal platform, rather than widely recognized systems like MT4 or MT5. For me, this limited the range of technical analysis tools and automated trading capabilities I’d grown accustomed to. While the platform functions adequately for basic execution, I did feel constrained by the absence of advanced features and customization options. The bigger concern, though, centers around regulation and platform safety. While CHIEF claims longstanding experience in Hong Kong, their SFC regulatory license for dealing in futures contracts has reportedly been revoked, and WikiFX flags considerable risk. As a trader who prioritizes capital safety, this lack of clear, up-to-date regulation weighs heavily. I would urge anyone considering CHIEF to approach with caution, thoroughly assess their own risk tolerance, and avoid relying solely on surface-level impressions of customer service or platform appearance.
用户评价 2
 
 你要评价的内容
请输入...


