Điểm
Jarden
https://www.jardengroup.com.au/
Website
Chỉ số đánh giá
Mức ảnh hưởng
Mức ảnh hưởng
D
Mức ảnh hưởng NO.1
Liên hệ
Cơ quan sở hữu giấy phép:JARDEN AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Số giấy phép cai quản:485351
Đơn lõi
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- Thông tin hiện tại cho thấy nhà môi giới này không có phần mềm giao dịch. Xin hãy lưu ý!
Người dùng đã xem Jarden cũng đã xem..
XM
CPT Markets
GO Markets
EC Markets
Website
jardengroup.com.au
120.138.22.63omfmarkets.com
104.26.13.216
Sơ đồ quan hệ
Tag sàn môi giới
Giới thiệu doanh nghiệp
| Jarden Tóm tắt Đánh giá | |
| Thành lập | 1961 |
| Quốc gia/Vùng | New Zealand |
| Quy định | Được quản lý bởi ASIC (Australia) |
| Công cụ Thị trường | Cổ phiếu, Ngoại hối, Hàng hóa, Hợp đồng tương lai, Lựa chọn |
| Tài khoản Demo | ❌ |
| Đòn bẩy | / |
| Chênh lệch | / |
| Nền tảng Giao dịch | Ranos, Commtrade, Market Trader |
| Yêu cầu Tiền gửi tối thiểu | / |
| Hỗ trợ Khách hàng | Mẫu Liên hệ |
| Điện thoại: +61 2 8077 1300 | |
| Email: info@afca.org.au | |
| Địa chỉ: Tầng 54, Tháp Thống đốc Phillip, Số 1 Farrer Place, Sydney NSW 2000 | |
Thông tin về Jarden
Jarden là một nhà môi giới có trụ sở tại New Zealand, thành lập vào năm 1961, được quản lý bởi ASIC. Cung cấp một loạt các công cụ thị trường đa dạng như: Cổ phiếu, Ngoại hối, Hàng hóa, Hợp đồng tương lai và Lựa chọn.

Ưu điểm và Nhược điểm
| Ưu điểm | Nhược điểm |
| Được quản lý bởi ASIC | Thông tin giao dịch hạn chế |
| Nhiều tài sản giao dịch | Không hỗ trợ MT4 và MT5 |
| Nhiều kênh liên hệ | Không có tài khoản demo |
| Văn phòng vật lý đã được chứng minh | |
| Thời gian hoạt động lâu dài |
Jarden Có Uy tín không?
Jarden được quản lýbởi Ủy ban Chứng khoán & Đầu tư Úc (ASIC), dưới JARDEN AUSTRALIA PTY LTD, với số giấy phép 000485351.
| Tình trạng Quy định | Được quản lý bởi | Tổ chức Được Cấp phép | Loại Giấy phép | Số Giấy phép |
| Được quản lý | Ủy ban Chứng khoán & Đầu tư Úc (ASIC) | JARDEN AUSTRALIA PTY LTD | Nhà Môi giới Thị trường (MM) | 000485351 |

Khảo sát Thực địa WikiFX
Nhóm khảo sát trường của WikiFX đã thăm địa chỉ của Jarden tại Úc, và chúng tôi đã tìm thấy văn phòng của họ tại địa điểm, điều này có nghĩa là công ty hoạt động với một văn phòng vật lý.

Tôi Có Thể Giao Dịch Gì trên Jarden?
| Công Cụ Giao Dịch | Hỗ Trợ |
| Cổ Phiếu | ✔ |
| Forex | ✔ |
| Hàng Hóa | ✔ |
| Hợp Đồng Tương Lai | ✔ |
| Tùy Chọn | ✔ |
| Chỉ Số | ❌ |
| Cổ Phiếu | ❌ |
| Tiền Điện Tử | ❌ |
| Trái Phiếu | ❌ |
| ETFs | ❌ |

Nền Tảng Giao Dịch
| Nền Tảng Giao Dịch | Hỗ Trợ | Thiết Bị Có Sẵn | Phù Hợp với |
| Ranos | ✔ | Web (dựa trên trình duyệt) | / |
| Commtrade | ✔ | Web (dựa trên trình duyệt) | / |
| Market Trader | ✔ | Windows | / |
| MT4 | ❌ | / | Người mới bắt đầu |
| MT5 | ❌ | / | Người giao dịch có kinh nghiệm |

Tóm tắt về công ty
- 5-10 năm
- Đăng ký tại Nước Úc
- Market Maker (MM)
- Lĩnh vực nghiệp vụ đáng ngờ
- Nguy cơ rủi ro trung bình
Hỏi & Đáp về Wiki
Are there any payment methods at Jarden that support instant withdrawals?
In my direct experience researching and considering Jarden as a trading broker, I found that essential details about payment methods, including instant withdrawals, were not provided openly by the broker. After carefully reviewing their available information, it’s apparent Jarden keeps their deposit and withdrawal procedures vague, with no specifics on supported payment methods or withdrawal speeds. This lack of transparency raises a few red flags for me as a forex trader, because the ability to deposit and especially to withdraw funds in a swift and reliable manner is critical to my trading operations and to my trust in a brokerage. While Jarden is regulated by ASIC in Australia and has a longstanding presence, the absence of clear information about withdrawal processing times does not give me the confidence I expect from an established financial institution. For traders accustomed to platforms offering instant or near-instant withdrawals through modern payment methods, this could be disappointing. Practically, I would exercise caution and expect that withdrawals may not be instant, simply because Jarden does not advertise this capability and their general lack of detail suggests a more traditional, potentially slower, process. Before committing significant funds, I believe it’s important to verify such operational details directly with their support or choose a broker with proven, transparent withdrawal procedures.
How do the different account types provided by Jarden compare to each other?
Speaking as an independent trader who always places a premium on transparency and platform accessibility, I’ve spent time evaluating Jarden’s offering. One major thing that stood out to me is the lack of clear information on account types. From my experience, clarity on account structures is fundamental for setting expectations around trading conditions like spreads, leverage, and minimum deposits. With Jarden, this vital detail appears absent. I’ve found no specification of differentiated accounts, and there’s no indication of distinct tiers tailored for beginners versus advanced traders. This left me unable to properly gauge how their services might scale with my needs or how competitive they truly are. Adding to that, Jarden does not offer a demo account, which I consider a considerable drawback, especially for traders wanting to safely explore a broker's features before committing funds. Testing conditions risk-free is something I always look for—so lacking this increases the level of caution I bring to any deposit decision. Jarden does provide regulated trading under ASIC and access to a variety of assets, which gives some reassurance regarding oversight and legitimacy. However, the combination of no demo account and limited account-specific data means I cannot comfortably compare any supposed account types or recommend them over more transparent brokers. For me, the lack of this critical information means I’d proceed carefully, especially if I prioritize knowing exactly what account features and protections I’d receive.
Does Jarden offer fixed or variable spreads, and how are those spreads affected when there's high market volatility, such as during major news events?
From my personal experience researching and evaluating brokers, I’ve always emphasized the importance of transparency in trading conditions—especially regarding spreads. With Jarden, I found there’s a notable lack of public information about whether spreads are fixed or variable. Their site and available materials don’t specify these details, which raises questions for me about the visibility of their cost structure. For a trader like me, understanding spread behavior is crucial, not only for everyday trading but especially during volatile periods, such as major news releases. Because Jarden operates as a market maker and does not offer standard platforms like MT4 or MT5—opting instead for proprietary web-based platforms—I’m cautious about assuming spread stability. Generally, market makers can either keep spreads fixed or variable, but most often, spreads widen during high volatility to manage risk. The absence of concrete spread information from Jarden makes it difficult for me to predict how their spreads react in fast markets. I’ve learned over time that brokers lacking transparency in this area often impose wider spreads during news events or periods of heightened uncertainty, resulting in higher trading costs. In summary, since Jarden does not provide clear, published data about their spreads, I approach trading with them very conservatively and would consider direct clarification from their support essential before engaging in high-impact sessions or news-driven trading.
What are the primary advantages and disadvantages of trading through Jarden?
In my experience trading with Jarden, I’ve noticed both strengths and limitations that anyone considering this broker should be aware of. First, the ASIC regulation under Jarden Australia Pty Ltd provides a measure of security and oversight, which is fundamental for safeguarding client interests—especially with the risks inherent to forex and derivatives. I also value that Jarden’s physical office in Australia has been confirmed, which adds a layer of transparency and legitimacy that I consider essential. On the other hand, Jarden doesn’t provide some features I usually look for. Most importantly, there’s no MT4 or MT5 support, and demo accounts are unavailable. As someone who always prefers to test a broker’s execution and spreads before committing live funds, the lack of a demo option is a real setback. While Jarden offers multiple web-based platforms (Ranos, Commtrade, Market Trader), these may not suit traders accustomed to industry-standard platforms with established reputations. Meanwhile, information on spreads, leverage, and account types is not clearly disclosed, which makes risk assessment difficult, and this ambiguity gives me pause. Additionally, I’ve come across user reports citing account access issues and slow customer response times, which raises concerns about operational reliability. For traders just starting out, Jarden’s simplicity could be a plus, but for me, trust is built on transparent terms and robust platform options. Given these factors, I urge prospective clients to tread carefully, conduct their own due diligence, and only trade what they can afford to lose.
người dùng Đánh giá 3
Nội dung bình luận
Vui lòng nhập...
Đánh giá 3

Chrome
Chrome extension
Yêu cầu về quy định của nhà môi giới ngoại hối toàn cầu
Đánh giá nhanh chóng website của các sàn giao dịch
Tải ngay
