점수
Grand Capital
https://grandch.com/en/home-4/
공식 사이트
평점 지수
환경
환경
D
평균 거래 속도(ms)
영향력
D
영향력 지수 NO.1
환경
속도:D
슬리피지:C
비용:AAA
연결 끊김:C
롤오버:D
영향력
영향력
D
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
라이선스 기관:Grand Capital Futures Limited
라이선스 번호:BOM175
- 이 브로커는 현재 효력 있는 규제가 없는 것으로 확인되었습니다. 위험에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
Grand Capital 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
XM
STARTRADER
VT Markets
FXCM
환경
웹사이트 감정
- grandch.com 198.71.233.254서버 위치- 미국 ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜--웹사이트 이름--회사--
회사 소개
| Grand Capital 리뷰 요약 | |
| 설립일 | 2019-04-10 | 
| 등록 국가/지역 | 영국 | 
| 규제 | 의심스러운 클론 | 
| 시장 상품 | 증권 및 고정 수익 상품 | 
| 거래 플랫폼 | 다양한 종류의 거래 플랫폼 (데스크톱 및 모바일) | 
| 고객 지원 | 전화: +852 3891 9888 | 
| 팩스: +852 2529 2899 | |
| 이메일: cs@grandch.com | |
Grand Capital 정보
Grand Capital Holdings Limited는 홍콩에 본사를 둔 금융 서비스 회사입니다. 자회사인 Grand Capital Securities Limited는 중개, 자산 관리 및 기관 사업부를 통해 개인, 기업 및 기관을 대상으로 실행 및 컨설팅 서비스를 제공합니다. 투자자는 데스크톱, 모바일 및 웹 기반 거래 플랫폼을 통해 전 세계 23개 거래 시장에 편리하게 접근할 수 있습니다.
장단점
| 장점 | 단점 | 
| 글로벌 시장 접근 | 의심스러운 클론 | 
| 다중 플랫폼 거래의 편리함 | 수수료 정보 불명확 | 
| 다양한 사업 영역 | 
Grand Capital의 신뢰성
Grand Capital의 신뢰성이 의심스럽습니다. 홍콩 규제 기관에 의해 규제되고 홍콩증권선물위원회(SFC)에서 발급한 관련 라이선스를 보유하고 있다고 주장하지만, 클론 회사로 의심되며, 합법적인 라이선스를 가지고 있다는 주장을 뒷받침할 실제적인 증거가 없습니다.


Grand Capital에서 무엇을 거래할 수 있나요?
Grand Capital은 증권 상품을 제공하여 전 세계 20개국 이상의 상장 주식 거래를 할 수 있습니다. 또한 ETF(상장지수펀드), REIT(부동산투자신탁), 파생상품증권 및 CBBC(콜러블 불-베어 계약)와 같은 상품도 포함되어 있습니다. 다양한 정부 및 기업 채권, 투자 등급 및 고수익 채권, 다중 통화 채권과 같은 고정 수익 상품에 대한 거래 서비스도 이용할 수 있습니다.
| 거래 가능한 상품 | 지원 | 
| 증권 | ✔ | 
| 고정 수익 상품 | ✔ | 
계정 유형
계정 소유자 기준으로 분류하면, Grand Capital은 개인 계정, 공동 계정 및 법인 계정을 제공합니다. 업무 유형별로 분류하면, Grand Capital의 증권 계정은 현금 계정과 마진 계정으로 나뉩니다. 현금 계정에서는 계정 소유자의 자금을 사용하여 거래가 이루어집니다. 반면, 마진 계정은 대출 자금을 사용하여 거래할 수 있으며, 투자 레버리지를 높이지만 더 높은 리스크를 가지고 있습니다.
또한, 전문 자산 관리에 중점을 둔 자산 관리 계정과 고순자금 고객을 위한 맞춤형 금융 서비스를 제공하는 사설 은행 계정도 있습니다.
레버리지
Grand Capital은 마진 트레이딩을 제공하며, 이는 투자자가 레버리지로 거래할 수 있음을 의미합니다. 레버리지는 투자 수익을 증폭시킬 수 있지만, 동시에 리스크도 증폭시킬 수 있습니다. 그러나 Grand Capital은 레버리지의 세부 사항을 명시하지 않았습니다.
거래 플랫폼
회사는 데스크톱 버전, 모바일 버전(Play 스토어 및 App Store에서 얻을 수 있음) 및 웹 기반 버전을 포함한 다양한 유형의 거래 플랫폼을 제공합니다. 이러한 플랫폼은 계좌 잔액 및 포지션 정보 확인과 같은 기능을 갖추고 있어 투자자가 언제든지 투자 상태를 추적할 수 있습니다.
키워드
- 5-10년
- 의문 있는 규제 라이선스
- 업무 구역 의심
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
Does Grand Capital charge a commission per lot traded on their ECN or raw spread accounts?
In my experience evaluating Grand Capital, I have not found sufficient or transparent information regarding their commission structure per lot traded, especially on ECN or raw spread accounts. While Grand Capital describes itself as providing access to global markets and a range of platforms, the key issue for me is a lack of clear, accessible fee or commission details on their website. As someone who prioritizes knowing all trading costs upfront—including per-lot commission fees—that lack of transparency is concerning. In addition, Grand Capital’s regulatory status appears quite uncertain. The WikiFX overview highlights “suspicious regulatory license” warnings, cloned company suspicions, and an overall low trust rating. For me, this environment further increases my need for explicit commission details, as higher-risk brokers sometimes offset low spreads with substantial commissions or hidden fees. Moreover, user reviews echo my experience, pointing out the absence of standard platforms like MT4/MT5 and general scarcity of information. Without clear, independently verified details about any commission per lot, I cannot confidently determine what charges may apply. As a result, until Grand Capital discloses transparent commission and fee schedules, I would be extremely cautious, and personally I would not proceed without absolute clarity on trading costs.
How much leverage does Grand Capital provide for major forex pairs, and how does their maximum leverage differ across other asset classes?
From my experience trading with a wide range of brokers, I always investigate a firm’s leverage terms before committing funds, especially with an offering as opaque as Grand Capital’s. Based on my research, Grand Capital does provide margin trading, allowing traders to use leverage to amplify positions—including on major forex pairs. However, one of my major concerns is the complete lack of public specification regarding the actual maximum leverage available, either on forex pairs or other asset classes. This missing detail is especially problematic for me since leverage is a critical factor in risk and strategy management. For other asset classes such as stocks, ETFs, REITs, and fixed-income products, Grand Capital similarly does not disclose any leverage caps. In the absence of this information, it becomes impossible to assess whether they offer industry-standard leverage (such as up to 1:30 for major forex pairs or lower ratios for CFDs and bonds, which are common among well-regulated brokers). Given that Grand Capital’s claimed regulatory status is under suspicion, I am particularly conservative. Transparency around leverage is not just a convenience; it’s fundamental to managing risk responsibly. Without clear disclosures, I would be extremely hesitant to use substantial leverage with Grand Capital, regardless of asset class, as this exposes traders like me to unknown risks. For me, clarity on leverage—both maximum limits and how they differ by instrument—is non-negotiable when choosing a broker.
According to your research and online feedback, how credible do you believe Grand Capital is?
In my personal experience as a trader who evaluates brokers with great care, Grand Capital raises several credibility concerns that I cannot ignore. The most troubling issue for me is their regulatory standing. Despite claims of being licensed by the Hong Kong SFC, independent checks strongly suggest that they are operating as a suspicious clone without verifiable regulatory credentials. As someone who prioritizes safety of funds, I find this lack of transparent oversight particularly risky. Additionally, the operational data does not inspire confidence. I observed significant technical drawbacks, including slow transaction speeds and high slippage, which could negatively impact real-world trading outcomes. When I explored their platforms, I was disappointed to find that neither MT4 nor MT5—industry-standard platforms—are offered. This absence forces traders to use unfamiliar software, and based on genuine user feedback, adapting to this change comes with uncertainty and hassle. Information transparency is another concern. Essential details about fees and leverage are either incomplete or absent, making it hard for me to accurately assess potential costs and risks before committing capital. While they promise access to global markets and functionality across multiple devices, none of these features outweigh the fundamental doubts regarding their legitimacy and the real risk posed by an unverified license. Out of caution and commitment to the safety of my own and others’ capital, I personally would not consider Grand Capital a credible or trustworthy choice at this time.
Which trading platforms are offered by Grand Capital? Do they support MT4, MT5, or cTrader?
Based on my direct experience investigating Grand Capital as a platform option, I discovered that they do not support the popular MT4 or MT5 trading platforms, nor do they offer cTrader. Instead, Grand Capital provides its own suite of trading platforms, including desktop, mobile, and web-based versions. While they advertise that these allow for account balance checks and portfolio management, I found the lack of MT4 and MT5 integration particularly limiting. As an experienced trader, I've come to rely on the flexibility, stability, and extensive toolsets offered by mainstream platforms like MT4, MT5, and cTrader. Their absence at Grand Capital introduces a significant adjustment period and forces users to adapt to a less familiar and possibly less robust trading environment. What's more concerning for me is the impression that Grand Capital's proprietary platforms might lack industry-standard features, integrations, and third-party support that experienced traders have come to expect. In my view, the decision not to offer MT4, MT5, or cTrader could hinder both execution efficiency and analytical capabilities for those of us accustomed to such professional-grade tools. Furthermore, switching to new and unproven platforms always carries additional risks, especially given Grand Capital's overall issues with transparency and regulatory status. For me, this absence of proven trading platforms is a serious disadvantage that calls for considerable caution.
사용자리뷰 2
 
 댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....

