天眼評分
Grand Capital · 大唐资本
http://www.grandch.com
官方網址
評分指數
交易環境
交易環境
D
平均交易速度(毫秒)
影響力
D
影響力指數 NO.1
交易環境
速度:D
滑點:C
成本:AAA
斷線:C
隔夜:D
影響力
影響力
D
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
持牌機構:Grand Capital Futures Limited
監管證號:BOM175
- 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效外匯監管,請注意風險!
瀏覽Grand Capital 大唐资本 的用戶還瀏覽了..
Vantage
HANTEC MARKETS
CPT Markets
交易環境
官網鑒定
grandch.com
198.71.233.254伺服器所在地美國
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間--網站名稱--所屬公司--
公司簡介
| 大唐资本 評論摘要 | |
| 成立日期 | 2019-04-10 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 英國 |
| 監管機構 | 可疑克隆 |
| 市場工具 | 證券和固定收益產品 |
| 交易平台 | 多種類型的交易平台(桌面和移動) |
| 客戶支援 | 電話:+852 3891 9888 |
| 傳真:+852 2529 2899 | |
| 電郵:cs@grandch.com | |
大唐资本 資訊
大唐资本 Holdings Limited 是一家總部位於香港的金融服務公司。其全資子公司 大唐资本 Securities Limited 通過其券商、財富管理、資產管理和機構業務部門為個人、企業和機構提供執行和諮詢服務。投資者可以通過其桌面、移動和基於網絡的交易平台方便地訪問全球23個交易市場。
優點和缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 全球市場接入 | 可疑克隆 |
| 多平台交易便利 | 費用信息不明確 |
| 多元化業務 |
大唐资本 是否合法?
大唐资本 的合法性存在疑問。雖然它聲稱受香港監管機構監管,並聲明持有香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會(SFC)發出的相關許可證,但據懷疑它是一家克隆公司,並沒有實際證據支持其擁有合法許可證的主張。


大唐资本 可以交易什麼?
大唐资本 提供證券產品,允許交易全球20多個國家的上市股票。它還涵蓋了 ETF(交易所交易基金)、REITs(房地產投資信託)、衍生權證和CBBCs(可調用牛熊合約)。還可以提供固定收益產品的交易服務,例如各種政府和企業債券、投資級和高收益債券,以及多幣種債券。
| 可交易產品 | 支援 |
| 證券 | ✔ |
| 固定收益 | ✔ |
帳戶類型
按帳戶持有人實體分類,大唐资本 提供個人帳戶、聯名帳戶和公司帳戶。按業務類型分類,大唐资本 的證券帳戶分為現金帳戶和保證金帳戶。在現金帳戶中,交易使用帳戶持有人的資金進行。另一方面,保證金帳戶允許使用借入的資金進行交易,這增加了投資槓桿,但也帶來了更高的風險。
此外,還有專注於專業資產管理的資產管理帳戶,以及為高資產淨值客戶提供定制金融服務的私人銀行帳戶。
槓桿
大唐资本 提供保證金交易,這意味著投資者可以透過槓桿進行交易。槓桿可以放大投資回報,但同時也會放大風險。然而,大唐资本 尚未具體說明槓桿的詳細內容。
交易平台
該公司提供多種類型的交易平台,包括桌面版本、移動版本(可從 Play Store 和 App Store 獲取),以及基於網頁的版本。這些平台配備了查詢賬戶餘額和持倉信息等功能,使投資者能夠隨時掌握其投資狀態。
企業畫像
- 5-10年
- 監管牌照存疑
- 展業區域存疑
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
Does Grand Capital charge a commission per lot traded on their ECN or raw spread accounts?
In my experience evaluating Grand Capital, I have not found sufficient or transparent information regarding their commission structure per lot traded, especially on ECN or raw spread accounts. While Grand Capital describes itself as providing access to global markets and a range of platforms, the key issue for me is a lack of clear, accessible fee or commission details on their website. As someone who prioritizes knowing all trading costs upfront—including per-lot commission fees—that lack of transparency is concerning. In addition, Grand Capital’s regulatory status appears quite uncertain. The WikiFX overview highlights “suspicious regulatory license” warnings, cloned company suspicions, and an overall low trust rating. For me, this environment further increases my need for explicit commission details, as higher-risk brokers sometimes offset low spreads with substantial commissions or hidden fees. Moreover, user reviews echo my experience, pointing out the absence of standard platforms like MT4/MT5 and general scarcity of information. Without clear, independently verified details about any commission per lot, I cannot confidently determine what charges may apply. As a result, until Grand Capital discloses transparent commission and fee schedules, I would be extremely cautious, and personally I would not proceed without absolute clarity on trading costs.
How much leverage does Grand Capital provide for major forex pairs, and how does their maximum leverage differ across other asset classes?
From my experience trading with a wide range of brokers, I always investigate a firm’s leverage terms before committing funds, especially with an offering as opaque as Grand Capital’s. Based on my research, Grand Capital does provide margin trading, allowing traders to use leverage to amplify positions—including on major forex pairs. However, one of my major concerns is the complete lack of public specification regarding the actual maximum leverage available, either on forex pairs or other asset classes. This missing detail is especially problematic for me since leverage is a critical factor in risk and strategy management. For other asset classes such as stocks, ETFs, REITs, and fixed-income products, Grand Capital similarly does not disclose any leverage caps. In the absence of this information, it becomes impossible to assess whether they offer industry-standard leverage (such as up to 1:30 for major forex pairs or lower ratios for CFDs and bonds, which are common among well-regulated brokers). Given that Grand Capital’s claimed regulatory status is under suspicion, I am particularly conservative. Transparency around leverage is not just a convenience; it’s fundamental to managing risk responsibly. Without clear disclosures, I would be extremely hesitant to use substantial leverage with Grand Capital, regardless of asset class, as this exposes traders like me to unknown risks. For me, clarity on leverage—both maximum limits and how they differ by instrument—is non-negotiable when choosing a broker.
According to your research and online feedback, how credible do you believe Grand Capital is?
In my personal experience as a trader who evaluates brokers with great care, Grand Capital raises several credibility concerns that I cannot ignore. The most troubling issue for me is their regulatory standing. Despite claims of being licensed by the Hong Kong SFC, independent checks strongly suggest that they are operating as a suspicious clone without verifiable regulatory credentials. As someone who prioritizes safety of funds, I find this lack of transparent oversight particularly risky. Additionally, the operational data does not inspire confidence. I observed significant technical drawbacks, including slow transaction speeds and high slippage, which could negatively impact real-world trading outcomes. When I explored their platforms, I was disappointed to find that neither MT4 nor MT5—industry-standard platforms—are offered. This absence forces traders to use unfamiliar software, and based on genuine user feedback, adapting to this change comes with uncertainty and hassle. Information transparency is another concern. Essential details about fees and leverage are either incomplete or absent, making it hard for me to accurately assess potential costs and risks before committing capital. While they promise access to global markets and functionality across multiple devices, none of these features outweigh the fundamental doubts regarding their legitimacy and the real risk posed by an unverified license. Out of caution and commitment to the safety of my own and others’ capital, I personally would not consider Grand Capital a credible or trustworthy choice at this time.
Which trading platforms are offered by Grand Capital? Do they support MT4, MT5, or cTrader?
Based on my direct experience investigating Grand Capital as a platform option, I discovered that they do not support the popular MT4 or MT5 trading platforms, nor do they offer cTrader. Instead, Grand Capital provides its own suite of trading platforms, including desktop, mobile, and web-based versions. While they advertise that these allow for account balance checks and portfolio management, I found the lack of MT4 and MT5 integration particularly limiting. As an experienced trader, I've come to rely on the flexibility, stability, and extensive toolsets offered by mainstream platforms like MT4, MT5, and cTrader. Their absence at Grand Capital introduces a significant adjustment period and forces users to adapt to a less familiar and possibly less robust trading environment. What's more concerning for me is the impression that Grand Capital's proprietary platforms might lack industry-standard features, integrations, and third-party support that experienced traders have come to expect. In my view, the decision not to offer MT4, MT5, or cTrader could hinder both execution efficiency and analytical capabilities for those of us accustomed to such professional-grade tools. Furthermore, switching to new and unproven platforms always carries additional risks, especially given Grand Capital's overall issues with transparency and regulatory status. For me, this absence of proven trading platforms is a serious disadvantage that calls for considerable caution.
用戶評價 2
你要評價的內容
請輸入...
