점수
Barclays
https://www.barclays.co.jp/home/
공식 사이트
평점 지수
영향력
영향력
C
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
효력 있는 규제 정보가 없습니다. 위험에 유의해 주세요!
- 이 브로커는 현재 효력 있는 규제가 없는 것으로 확인되었습니다. 위험에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
Barclays 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
CPT Markets
XM
Neex
MiTRADE
웹사이트 감정
barclays.co.jp
147.63.166.185서버 위치미국
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜--웹사이트 이름--회사--
관계 계보
회사 소개
| Barclays 리뷰 요약 | |
| 설립 연도 | 1997 |
| 등록 국가/지역 | 불가리아 |
| 규제 | 규제 없음 |
| 금융 서비스 | 자본 시장 솔루션, 투자 은행, 외환, 파생상품 거래, 자금 관리 |
| 고객 지원 | Barclays Securities Co., Ltd.도쿄도 미나토구 롯폰기 6-10-1 롯폰기 힐즈 모리 타워 31층 106-6131 전화: 03-4530-1100 |
| Barclays 은행 도쿄 지점, 도쿄도 미나토구 롯폰기 6-10-1 롯폰기 힐즈 모리 타워 31층 106-6131 전화: 03-4530-5100 | |
| Barclays 투자 관리 주식회사도쿄도 미나토구 롯폰기 6-10-1 롯폰기 힐즈 모리 타워 31층 106-6131 전화: 03-4530-2400 | |
| Barclays 서비스 일본 주식회사도쿄도 미나토구 롯폰기 6-10-1 롯폰기 힐즈 모리 타워 31층 106-6131 전화: 03-4530-1190 | |
Barclays 정보
Barclays은 글로벌 네트워크의 중요한 부분으로서 일본에서 Barclays Securities Co., Ltd., Barclays 은행 도쿄 지점, Barclays 투자 관리 주식회사를 통해 비즈니스 기업, 금융 기관, 기관 투자가 및 공공 기관을 대상으로 금융 서비스를 제공합니다.
2008년 리먼 브라더스의 북미 사업을 인수한 후 특히 글로벌 확장을 거듭한 Barclays은 일본의 주요 투자 은행 중 하나로 자리매김했습니다.
그러나 Barclays은 일본의 공식 당국에 의해 규제를 받지 않고 있습니다, 이는 신뢰성과 신뢰성이 떨어질 수 있음을 고려해야 합니다.

장단점
| 장점 | 단점 |
| 글로벌 존재감 | 일본에서의 규제 없음 |
| 신뢰할 수 있는 모회사 | |
| 다양한 금융 서비스 제공 |
Barclays 합법성
중개 플랫폼의 안전성을 측정하는 가장 중요한 요소는 공식적으로 규제를 받는지 여부입니다. Barclays은 규제를 받지 않는 중개업체로, 사용자의 자금 안전 및 거래 활동이 효과적으로 보호되지 않습니다. 투자자는 Barclays을 신중히 선택해야 합니다.

Barclays 서비스
Barclays 일본은 자본 시장 솔루션, 투자 은행, 외환, 파생상품 거래, 및 자금 관리를 포함한 포괄적인 금융 서비스를 제공합니다.
Barclays 증권은 자금 조달, 자산 관리, 및 자문 서비스에 중점을 두고 있습니다;

도쿄 지점은 FX 및 파생상품을 중점으로 한 도매 시장 접근을 용이하게 합니다;

Barclays 투자 관리는 다양한 자산 클래스를 대상으로 상호 펀드를 관리하여 기관 투자자의 요구를 충족시킵니다.

키워드
- 2-5년
- 의문 있는 규제 라이선스
- 업무 구역 의심
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
Is it possible to add funds to my Barclays account with cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or USDT?
Based on my careful review of the available information, I would advise a highly cautious approach regarding the idea of adding funds—whether via cryptocurrency or any other means—to an account with Barclays in its current form as presented here. The broker operates in Japan, but according to the data, Barclays lacks valid local regulation and has a suspicious regulatory license with a high-risk warning. For me as a trader, regulation is the cornerstone of security and transparency; without oversight, there is a much higher risk that client funds may not be protected, and dispute resolution is uncertain at best. There is no mention in the provided context of support for funding through cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or USDT. In my experience, reputable and well-regulated forex brokers will always disclose their supported deposit methods transparently, and any absence of this information raises concerns. Adding funds through cryptocurrencies, while increasingly popular among some brokers, brings its own risks—mainly, limited recourse in case of transaction disputes, potential exposure to price volatility, and, crucially, anonymity that can complicate recovery if issues arise. Given the high-risk flags, lack of regulation, and user reports of withdrawal problems, I would not attempt to fund an account—in crypto or otherwise—without clear, verifiable information and robust regulatory oversight. Always prioritize safety and full transparency.
How do the different types of accounts available at Barclays compare to each other?
From my experience and based on the available information, it's important to approach Barclays’ forex and trading services with notable caution, especially regarding account types. Unlike many brokers that clearly outline standard, ECN, or professional account offerings, I found Barclays’ presentation of distinct trading accounts to be lacking in transparency. Their focus appears largely on institutional services—such as capital markets, investment banking, foreign exchange, and fund management—rather than retail forex trading accounts for individuals. What stands out for me, and should be a decisive factor for any trader, is that Barclays in Japan operates without formal regulatory oversight. Reliable regulation is crucial because it helps safeguard client funds and establish a standard of accountability. Without such oversight, there’s an elevated risk, regardless of the account type you might be offered. Furthermore, the only user review available details significant difficulties with withdrawals and changing account terms, which raises additional trust concerns in the absence of robust regulation. In summary, as someone who prioritizes fund safety and transparent conditions, I have to note that the comparative analysis of account types at Barclays is fundamentally undermined by their unregulated status and insufficient public details. For me, this means I cannot confidently recommend any account structure they may advertise until both transparency and regulatory oversight improve.
Could you tell me what the typical spread is for EUR/USD when trading on a standard Barclays account?
As an experienced trader, I have to clarify that based on the information currently available, I cannot find any definitive or transparent details regarding the typical spread for EUR/USD on a standard Barclays account. In my personal review of the broker, this lack of clear disclosure immediately raises concerns for me. Most reputable and trustworthy forex brokers prominently publish their spreads, particularly for a widely traded pair like EUR/USD, because spreads directly impact every trader’s bottom line. However, the context here shows that Barclays lacks valid regulation in Japan and carries several warning signs such as a suspicious regulatory license and high potential risk. In my trading career, I have learned firsthand that regulatory oversight is a critical layer of protection. When a broker operates without clear regulation and does not provide basic trading condition details like spread ranges, it becomes very difficult for me to trust them with my funds. The absence of this key information means I cannot accurately assess the cost of trading or compare Barclays to other more transparent, regulated brokers. For me, personally, this uncertainty is a strong reason to proceed with extreme caution, if at all. I would advise anyone to be wary and demand full transparency before considering any live trading or deposits.
How much is the least amount you need to deposit to start a live trading account at Barclays?
In my experience as a trader, one of the most important aspects when evaluating a broker is transparency about funding requirements and clear, reliable information on account setup. For Barclays, based on the information available, there is no official or clear indication of the minimum deposit required to open a live trading account. The lack of this detail itself raises some concerns for me. Additionally, what stands out to me is the total absence of valid regulatory oversight in Japan—Barclays currently operates without regulation there, which directly impacts trustworthiness. From a risk management perspective, trading with an unregulated broker means client funds and trading operations are not protected by any governing authority. The user review I came across described a situation where money was deposited ($267 was mentioned as the initial amount) under the impression it would be easily accessible, only for the user to encounter shifting requirements, unresponsiveness, and ultimately no access to their funds. This experience, coupled with the high risk warnings and suspicious licensing status, makes me extremely cautious. For me, the combination of no clear minimum deposit policy and the regulatory concerns would be reason enough to reconsider opening an account, regardless of the initial deposit size suggested by anecdotes. My personal approach is to only fund accounts with brokers who are fully transparent, regulated, and have a proven track record of honoring deposits and withdrawals.








