天眼评分
United Securities Co.
https://www.unitedco.ps/en
官方网址
评分指数
MT4/5鉴定
MT4/5鉴定
主标
UnitedSecurities-Server
影响力
C
影响力指数 NO.1
MT4/5鉴定
MT4/5鉴定
主标
影响力
影响力
C
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
暂未查证到有效监管信息,请注意风险!
- 经查证,该交易商当前暂无有效外汇监管,请注意风险!
正规的主标MT4/5交易商会有健全的系统服务与后续技术支持,一般情况下业务和技术都较为成熟、风险控制能力较强
浏览 United Securities Co. 的用户还浏览了..
fpmarkets
VT Markets
IC Markets Global
官网鉴定
unitedco.ps
82.213.17.8服务器所在地巴勒斯坦
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称--所属公司--
公司简介
| United Securities Co. 评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 1996 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 巴勒斯坦 |
| 监管 | 无监管 |
| 服务 | 专有交易、代他人交易、发行管理、投资组合管理、托管服务、外国市场交易、交易应用、电子交易 |
| 模拟账户 | ❌ |
| 杠杆 | 最高达1:300 |
| 点差 | 从0点起 |
| 交易平台 | United Securities Co.,MT5 |
| 最低存款 | $100 |
| 客户支持 | 在线聊天、联系表单 |
| 电话:02-2423090 | |
| 邮箱:info@unitedco.ps | |
| 地址:Rawabi City Q Center, 办公楼, 一楼 | |
| 社交媒体:Facebook、Whatsapp、Instagram、LinkedIn | |
United Securities Co. 信息
United Securities Co. 是一家成立于1996年的巴勒斯坦的未受监管的一流经纪和金融服务提供商,提供专有交易、代他人交易、发行管理、投资组合管理、托管服务、外国市场交易、交易应用和电子交易等服务。

优缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| 运营时间长 | 缺乏监管 |
| 多种联系渠道 | 无模拟 账户 |
| 多样的交易产品 | 无MT4平台 |
| MT5平台 | 收取佣金 手续费 |
| 账户选择有限 |
United Securities Co. 是否合法?
No. United Securities Co. 目前没有有效的监管。请注意风险!

United Securities Co. 服务
| 服务 | 支持 |
| 专有交易 | ✔ |
| 代他人交易 | ✔ |
| 发行管理 | ✔ |
| 投资组合管理 | ✔ |
| 托管服务 | ✔ |
| 在外国市场交易 | ✔ |
| 交易应用 | ✔ |
| 电子交易 | ✔ |

账户类型和费用
| 账户类型 | 最低存款 | 最大杠杆 | 点差 | 佣金 |
| 专业 | $1,000 | 1:300 | 0 点 | $4/手 |
| 标准 | $100 | 1:300 | 1 点 | ❌ |

交易平台
| 交易平台 | 支持 | 可用设备 | 适合 |
| United Securities Co. 应用 | ✔ | 手机, 台式机, 笔记本电脑 | / |
| MT5 | ✔ | 手机, 台式机, 网页 | 经验丰富的交易者 |
| MT4 | ❌ | / | 初学者 |


存款和取款
United Securities Co. 接受通过 VISA, mastercard 和银行转账进行的付款。

企业画像
- 1-2年
- 监管牌照存疑
- 主标MT5
- 自研
- 区域性交易商
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Is United Securities Co. overseen by any regulatory bodies, and if so, which financial authorities are responsible for its regulation?
In my thorough review of United Securities Co., I found that it is not currently overseen by any recognized regulatory body. Despite a long operational history since 1996 and the offering of services in Palestine, the absence of regulatory oversight is a significant concern for me as a trader. A lack of valid regulation means there’s no independent authority ensuring the broker adheres to strict financial standards, a factor which directly impacts client fund safety and dispute resolution mechanisms. When considering any broker, especially one providing leverage up to 1:300 and dealing in international markets, I place high value on transparent, verifiable regulation from authorities like ASIC, FCA, or CySEC. United Securities Co.’s unregulated status means I would have far less recourse in cases of unexpected issues or disputes, and I know from experience that regulatory frameworks protect not just funds but also ensure sound operational practices. For these reasons, I am cautious about using or recommending United Securities Co. Without clear supervision from a recognized financial authority, I’m unable to consider this provider a secure option for my trading capital.
Is it possible to deposit funds into my United Securities Co. account with cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or USDT?
Based on my careful review of United Securities Co., I was unable to find any mention or indication that funding accounts via cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or USDT is supported. From what I could see, their accepted payment methods are limited to VISA, Mastercard, and traditional bank transfers. This is a crucial point for me as a trader who often assesses the flexibility of deposit and withdrawal methods, particularly when dealing with an international broker. I tend to be especially cautious with unregulated entities, and the limited funding options here intensify that caution. The absence of crypto funding not only rules out a potentially faster and sometimes more accessible transaction route, but it also serves as an indicator about the broker’s operational scope and regulatory posture. For me, reliable and diverse funding channels are important for both convenience and risk management. Since United Securities Co. currently offers no crypto deposit support and operates without valid regulatory oversight, I strongly advise being thorough and conservative in evaluating whether this matches your needs and risk tolerance. It’s essential to prioritize capital safety, especially when flexible, modern funding methods aren’t available.
Are there any inactivity fees at United Securities Co., and if they exist, what are the specific terms and requirements?
In my experience, understanding the full fee structure of any broker is vital, especially when it comes to less obvious charges like inactivity fees. After carefully reviewing the available information about United Securities Co., I could not find any mention of inactivity fees or the specific terms and conditions tied to such charges. This lack of clarity concerned me, as brokers without clear, accessible information about all potential fees pose a heightened risk for unexpected costs down the line. What stood out for me is that United Securities Co. does charge commissions on some account types and lacks regulatory oversight, which for me raises the bar for due diligence even higher. Typically, reputable brokers are transparent about all fees, including those related to dormant accounts, because hidden or surprise charges negatively impact a trader’s trust and overall cost assessment. Given that United Securities Co. operates without valid regulation and doesn't provide robust fee disclosures, I would proceed with caution. Before committing funds or opening an account, I would directly contact their support to request explicit documentation regarding any inactivity or maintenance charges. In my view, a responsible trader should always obtain this information in writing before taking the next step, as part of a cautious and well-informed approach to broker selection.
Have you noticed any drawbacks with United Securities Co.'s customer service or the reliability of their trading platform?
In my experience with United Securities Co., there are significant considerations around both customer service and platform reliability that any trader should weigh carefully. The biggest concern for me is their lack of regulation. Operating without oversight means there's no external authority to ensure fair practices or protect client interests, which adds an inherent layer of risk—not just financially, but also in terms of customer support accountability. While United Securities Co. does provide a range of contact options—phone, email, live chat, and social media—I personally found that this does not necessarily guarantee effective resolution of issues, especially in critical situations where regulated brokers would be held to clear standards. As for their trading platform, they primarily offer MT5, which, in my view, is robust and widely trusted among experienced traders. However, they do not support MT4, which many beginners and even seasoned traders still prefer for its ease of use and extensive community. Another drawback is their execution speed—averaging around 194 milliseconds—which is not exceptionally fast, especially when compared to leading global brokers. For traders who rely on rapid entries and exits, this could be a hindrance. The absence of a demo account is another point of frustration for me, as it prevents new users from testing the platform and support systems without risk. For those who value high reliability and fully accountable support, the combination of non-regulation and these platform limitations makes United Securities Co. a less attractive choice, especially when compared to established, regulated competitors. I’d recommend a cautious approach and thorough due diligence if considering them.
你要评价的内容
请输入...
