점수
United Securities Co.
https://www.unitedco.ps/en
공식 사이트
평점 지수
MT4/5 감정
MT4/5
전체 라이선스
UnitedSecurities-Server
영향력
C
영향력 지수 NO.1
MT4/5 감정
MT4/5 감정
전체 라이선스
영향력
영향력
C
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
효력 있는 규제 정보가 없습니다. 위험에 유의해 주세요!
- 이 브로커는 현재 효력 있는 규제가 없는 것으로 확인되었습니다. 위험에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
정식 MT4/5 마스터 레이블 브로커는 건전한 시스템 서비스와 사후 기술 지원을 제공합니다. 보통 비즈니스와 기술이 성숙하고 리스크 관리 능력이 강합니다.
United Securities Co. 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
VT Markets
taurex
HANTEC MARKETS
Vantage
웹사이트 감정
unitedco.ps
82.213.17.8서버 위치팔레스타인
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜--웹사이트 이름--회사--
회사 소개
| United Securities Co. 리뷰 요약 | |
| 설립 연도 | 1996 |
| 등록 국가/지역 | 팔레스타인 |
| 규제 | 규제 없음 |
| 서비스 | 자체 거래, 대리 거래, 발행 관리, 포트폴리오 관리, 수탁 서비스, 외국 시장 거래, 거래 응용 프로그램, 전자 거래 |
| 데모 계정 | ❌ |
| 레버리지 | 최대 1:300 |
| 스프레드 | 0포인트부터 |
| 거래 플랫폼 | United Securities Co., MT5 |
| 최소 입금액 | $100 |
| 고객 지원 | 실시간 채팅, 연락 양식 |
| 전화: 02-2423090 | |
| 이메일: info@unitedco.ps | |
| 주소: Rawabi City Q Center, 사무실 건물, 1층 | |
| 소셜 미디어: Facebook, Whatsapp, Instagram, LinkedIn | |
United Securities Co. 정보
United Securities Co.은 1996년에 팔레스타인에서 설립된 규제되지 않은 프리미어 중개 및 금융 서비스 제공업체입니다. 자체 거래, 대리 거래, 발행 관리, 포트폴리오 관리, 수탁 서비스, 외국 시장 거래, 거래 응용 프로그램 및 전자 거래 서비스를 제공합니다.

장단점
| 장점 | 단점 |
| 운영 시간이 길다 | 규제 부족 |
| 다양한 연락 수단 | 데모 계정 없음 |
| 다양한 거래 상품 | MT4 플랫폼 없음 |
| MT5 플랫폼 | 수수료 부과 |
| 계정 선택이 제한됨 |
United Securities Co. 합법적인가요?
No. United Securities Co. 현재 유효한 규정이 없습니다. 리스크를 인식해주십시오!

United Securities Co. 서비스
| 서비스 | 지원 |
| 자체 거래 | ✔ |
| 대리 거래 | ✔ |
| 발행 관리 | ✔ |
| 포트폴리오 관리 | ✔ |
| 보관 서비스 | ✔ |
| 외국 시장 거래 | ✔ |
| 거래 응용 프로그램 | ✔ |
| E-Trade | ✔ |

계정 유형 및 수수료
| 계정 유형 | 최소 입금액 | 최대 레버리지 | 스프레드 | 수수료 |
| 전문가 | $1,000 | 1:300 | 0 pips | $4/side |
| 표준 | $100 | 1:300 | 1 pip | ❌ |

거래 플랫폼
| 거래 플랫폼 | 지원 | 사용 가능한 장치 | 적합한 대상 |
| United Securities Co. 앱 | ✔ | 모바일, 데스크톱, 노트북 | / |
| MT5 | ✔ | 모바일, 데스크톱, 웹 | 경험 있는 트레이더 |
| MT4 | ❌ | / | 초보자 |


입금 및 출금
United Securities Co.은(는) VISA, mastercard 및 은행송금을 통한 결제를 받습니다.

키워드
- 1-2년
- 의문 있는 규제 라이선스
- 마스터 레이블 MT5
- 자체 연구개발
- 지역성 브로커
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
Is United Securities Co. overseen by any regulatory bodies, and if so, which financial authorities are responsible for its regulation?
In my thorough review of United Securities Co., I found that it is not currently overseen by any recognized regulatory body. Despite a long operational history since 1996 and the offering of services in Palestine, the absence of regulatory oversight is a significant concern for me as a trader. A lack of valid regulation means there’s no independent authority ensuring the broker adheres to strict financial standards, a factor which directly impacts client fund safety and dispute resolution mechanisms. When considering any broker, especially one providing leverage up to 1:300 and dealing in international markets, I place high value on transparent, verifiable regulation from authorities like ASIC, FCA, or CySEC. United Securities Co.’s unregulated status means I would have far less recourse in cases of unexpected issues or disputes, and I know from experience that regulatory frameworks protect not just funds but also ensure sound operational practices. For these reasons, I am cautious about using or recommending United Securities Co. Without clear supervision from a recognized financial authority, I’m unable to consider this provider a secure option for my trading capital.
Is it possible to deposit funds into my United Securities Co. account with cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or USDT?
Based on my careful review of United Securities Co., I was unable to find any mention or indication that funding accounts via cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or USDT is supported. From what I could see, their accepted payment methods are limited to VISA, Mastercard, and traditional bank transfers. This is a crucial point for me as a trader who often assesses the flexibility of deposit and withdrawal methods, particularly when dealing with an international broker. I tend to be especially cautious with unregulated entities, and the limited funding options here intensify that caution. The absence of crypto funding not only rules out a potentially faster and sometimes more accessible transaction route, but it also serves as an indicator about the broker’s operational scope and regulatory posture. For me, reliable and diverse funding channels are important for both convenience and risk management. Since United Securities Co. currently offers no crypto deposit support and operates without valid regulatory oversight, I strongly advise being thorough and conservative in evaluating whether this matches your needs and risk tolerance. It’s essential to prioritize capital safety, especially when flexible, modern funding methods aren’t available.
Are there any inactivity fees at United Securities Co., and if they exist, what are the specific terms and requirements?
In my experience, understanding the full fee structure of any broker is vital, especially when it comes to less obvious charges like inactivity fees. After carefully reviewing the available information about United Securities Co., I could not find any mention of inactivity fees or the specific terms and conditions tied to such charges. This lack of clarity concerned me, as brokers without clear, accessible information about all potential fees pose a heightened risk for unexpected costs down the line. What stood out for me is that United Securities Co. does charge commissions on some account types and lacks regulatory oversight, which for me raises the bar for due diligence even higher. Typically, reputable brokers are transparent about all fees, including those related to dormant accounts, because hidden or surprise charges negatively impact a trader’s trust and overall cost assessment. Given that United Securities Co. operates without valid regulation and doesn't provide robust fee disclosures, I would proceed with caution. Before committing funds or opening an account, I would directly contact their support to request explicit documentation regarding any inactivity or maintenance charges. In my view, a responsible trader should always obtain this information in writing before taking the next step, as part of a cautious and well-informed approach to broker selection.
Have you noticed any drawbacks with United Securities Co.'s customer service or the reliability of their trading platform?
In my experience with United Securities Co., there are significant considerations around both customer service and platform reliability that any trader should weigh carefully. The biggest concern for me is their lack of regulation. Operating without oversight means there's no external authority to ensure fair practices or protect client interests, which adds an inherent layer of risk—not just financially, but also in terms of customer support accountability. While United Securities Co. does provide a range of contact options—phone, email, live chat, and social media—I personally found that this does not necessarily guarantee effective resolution of issues, especially in critical situations where regulated brokers would be held to clear standards. As for their trading platform, they primarily offer MT5, which, in my view, is robust and widely trusted among experienced traders. However, they do not support MT4, which many beginners and even seasoned traders still prefer for its ease of use and extensive community. Another drawback is their execution speed—averaging around 194 milliseconds—which is not exceptionally fast, especially when compared to leading global brokers. For traders who rely on rapid entries and exits, this could be a hindrance. The absence of a demo account is another point of frustration for me, as it prevents new users from testing the platform and support systems without risk. For those who value high reliability and fully accountable support, the combination of non-regulation and these platform limitations makes United Securities Co. a less attractive choice, especially when compared to established, regulated competitors. I’d recommend a cautious approach and thorough due diligence if considering them.
댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....
