天眼評分
StoneX
https://www.stonex.com/
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
A
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
單核
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 交易商所宣稱的美國NFA監管(監管號:0339826)未驗證,請注意風險!
瀏覽StoneX 的用戶還瀏覽了..
AVATRADE
STARTRADER
HANTEC MARKETS
搜索來源
投放語言
市場分析
素材投放
官網鑒定
danielstrading.com
192.0.66.142gainfutures.com
192.0.66.142stonex.com
217.114.85.70
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| StoneX 檢討摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 2003 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 美國 |
| 監管 | 無監管 |
| 市場工具 | 商品、證券、外匯、數字資產 |
| 模擬帳戶 | ✅ |
| 槓桿 | / |
| 點差 | / |
| 交易平台 | StoneX One |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客戶支援 | 電話:+12124853500 |
| 地址:230 Park Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10169 | |
| X、Instagram、LinkedIn、YouTube | |
StoneX 資訊
成立於2003年,StoneX 是一家在美國註冊的無監管經紀商,提供在StoneX One平台上交易商品、證券、外匯和數字資產。

優缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 模擬帳戶 | 無監管 |
| 分離帳戶 | 收費結構不清晰 |
| 多樣化交易產品 | 沒有存取和提款資訊 |
| 長期運營歷史 |
StoneX 是否合法?
否。StoneX 目前沒有有效的監管。請注意風險!


我可以在StoneX上交易什麼?
StoneX 提供商品、證券、外匯和數字資產交易。
| 可交易工具 | 支援 |
| 商品 | ✔ |
| 證券 | ✔ |
| 外匯 | ✔ |
| 數字資產 | ✔ |
| 指數 | ❌ |
| 債券 | ❌ |
| 期權 | ❌ |
| ETFs | ❌ |

帳戶類型
通過StoneX One,投資者和交易員可以開立證券帳戶,目前這些帳戶僅適用於美國居民。此外,StoneX One提供模擬帳戶。
交易平台
StoneX One 使用自家的交易平台。
| 交易平台 | 支援 | 適合對象 |
| StoneX One | ✔ | / |
| MT4 | ❌ | 初學者 |
| MT5 | ❌ | 經驗豐富的交易者 |
企業畫像
- 5-10年
- 香港監管
- 期貨合約交易
- 全球展業
- 中級風險隱患
資訊

資訊 StoneX 與荷蘭銀行 BMG 合作推動跨境支付
StoneX Payments 已與 Bank Mendes Gans (BMG) 建立合作關係,以加強跨境交易。這項協議將讓 BMG 能夠使用 StoneX 的 API 驅動平台,據報導該平台可實現超過 140 種貨幣、180 個國家的支付。

曝光 StoneX影響力評級為A,為何天眼評分不高?外匯天眼帶你了解券商詳情
上個月外匯天眼發布StoneX 將收購 Intercam Advisors 與 Intercam Securities的報導,因此不少用戶都有查詢這家券商的評價,卻發現其天眼評分相當低,讓人感到不解。為此,今天就讓我們帶大家一起解析該平台。

資訊 StoneX 將收購 Intercam Advisors 與 Intercam Securities
全球金融服務公司StoneX Group Inc.(納斯達克代碼:SNEX),2025/6/30宣布已與 Intercam Holdings, Inc. 簽署意向書,擬收購 Intercam Advisors, Inc. 與 Intercam Securities, Inc.。

曝光 StoneX 2025財年第2季外匯與差價合約(FX/CFD)收入下滑
StoneX Group Inc.(NASDAQ:SNEX),擁有 FOREX.com 和 City Index 等零售外匯品牌,已公布截至 2025 年 3 月 31 日的 2025 財政年度第二季財務報告。
Wiki問答
On average, how much time does it usually take for a StoneX withdrawal to reach your bank account or e-wallet?
In my experience and based on the information available, I could not find any specific, transparent details regarding StoneX’s typical withdrawal processing times. This lack of disclosure immediately raised concerns for me, particularly as clear withdrawal procedures are a critical factor in assessing a broker’s reliability. As an independent trader, I’ve learned to be especially cautious with firms that don’t openly state their funding and withdrawal timelines, as this creates room for uncertainty and risk. What stood out for me was the recurring theme in user reports detailing significant withdrawal issues—delays, extra requirements, and even allegations of money being withheld until additional taxes or fees are paid. Several users described situations where withdrawal requests were frozen or subjected to unexpected hurdles, which is atypical for well-regulated or transparent brokers. In my view, these patterns, coupled with the fact that StoneX currently operates without valid regulatory oversight, make it impossible for me to provide any average or expected withdrawal timeframe with confidence. For traders considering StoneX, I strongly recommend being very cautious and thoroughly investigating all withdrawal conditions and the broker’s regulatory standing before depositing funds. In my opinion, the lack of clarity around withdrawals is a significant red flag and not something I’m comfortable risking my capital on.
Does StoneX charge a commission for each lot traded on its ECN or raw spread accounts?
Based on my review of StoneX as an experienced trader, I must highlight that the information currently available is quite limited and raises some critical concerns that shape my approach to fees and commissions. Specifically, StoneX does not provide transparent details regarding its fee structure, including whether it charges commissions per lot on any ECN or raw spread account types. This lack of clarity is something I always view with caution, as understanding the cost of each trade is fundamental for consistent trading performance and risk management. Additionally, it’s important to recognize that StoneX is not regulated by any recognized authority at this time. This absence of regulation, coupled with an unclear fee schedule and no mention of ECN or raw spread trading accounts, forces me to be especially conservative. In my experience, regulated brokers will always make their commission and spread structure very clear in their account details, as this is essential for both trust and compliance reasons. While StoneX does offer a demo account and a proprietary platform, these positives do not offset my concerns regarding the ambiguous pricing model. Without verified and transparent information about trading commissions or spreads for forex trading, I cannot comment definitively on the costs for each lot traded, and therefore, I would not proceed with live trading or significant capital commitments under such conditions.
How do StoneX's swap fees (overnight financing charges) stack up against those charged by other brokers?
Based on my experience and review of the available information, I have not found any clear or public data regarding StoneX's swap fees or specific overnight financing charges. This lack of transparency stands out for me compared to other brokers in the industry. With many of the brokers I’ve worked with, including some well-established ones, swap rates are usually detailed on either the platform itself or in the fee schedule, making it much easier for me to estimate my potential holding costs. At StoneX, not only is the fee structure unclear, but there’s also no direct mention of swaps or overnight charges in the published material. As an active trader, especially when engaging in strategies that require holding positions overnight, knowing these financing costs is critical for risk management and accurate profit calculations. The absence of such disclosure means I cannot directly compare StoneX’s swaps to those of other brokers, some of whom offer competitive and clearly stated rates. Furthermore, considering StoneX’s lack of regulatory oversight and the reported issues surrounding withdrawals and fees, I am personally even more cautious. For traders who rely on transparent costs and regulatory protection, this represents a significant drawback. Until StoneX provides explicit, verifiable information on their swap fees, I would advise a conservative approach and recommend only trading with brokers who are fully transparent and regulated regarding their overnight financing policies.
Is StoneX overseen by any regulatory bodies, and if so, which financial authorities are responsible for its regulation?
As an experienced forex trader who values strict oversight in financial dealings, regulatory status is always a primary consideration for me before engaging with any broker. In my investigation of StoneX, I found that despite claims and some references to regulatory bodies like the FCA in the UK and the NFA in the US, StoneX is not currently under valid or verified regulation. The WikiFX data makes it clear that its regulatory licenses are marked as "unverified" or even "suspicious," and there is an explicit warning about the absence of effective regulatory oversight. In practice, this means there's no reputable authority—such as the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or the US National Futures Association (NFA)—providing supervision over StoneX’s business activities. This distinction is critical because genuine regulatory oversight is what provides traders with safeguards, grievance redress, and a level of capital protection. Without it, the risk of encountering operational, withdrawal, or security issues increases substantially. Based on my experience, trading with unregulated or questionably regulated entities carries higher potential downside with little recourse in case of disputes or irregularities, so I personally would not be comfortable depositing funds or trading actively on such a platform.
用戶評價 8
你要評價的內容
請輸入...


























춘자
韓國
叫我申請新股,之後話抽籤中咗要我鎖住筆錢,跟住叫我全數提款,結果手續費1800萬韓圜。貸款25%供款2000萬韓圜。快速轉帳服務費1500萬韓圜。交完錢之後,而家又話要交轉讓所得稅3600萬韓圜。話如果今日唔入數,筆錢就會被凍結。啲戶口似乎全部都係假嘅。我係咪被騙咗??我放咗太多錢入去喇。
爆料
Supamit Phompinit
泰國
我在https://monteco.top平台交易,賺取了124654.41usdt的巨額利潤。他們說需要先轉賬10%的稅款,因為他們無法從他們的賬戶中扣除款項。
爆料
FX3914838800
台灣
說一定要繳完20%稅收才可以正常出金 什麼時候規定出金要繳納稅收? 結果後來就凍結帳戶,最好是退回本金
爆料
Henry9
新西蘭
在我們開始使用StoneX之前,處理跨國支付是一個頭痛的問題。現在,有了他們的外匯解決方案,一切變得更加順暢。他們處理複雜性,而我更專注於經營我們的業務。
好評
FX1490860758
美國
我曾經從證券到貨幣進行交易,多樣性一直讓它保持著刺激。無縫的全球支付使交易快速且方便。交易實物商品是一種有趣的體驗。然而,掌握一些場外產品有點需要學習曲線...
中評
子衿17205
英國
我對 StoneX 的產品和服務、出色的客戶支持、定制的交易條件和快速的執行時間非常滿意!
好評
HQ
哥倫比亞
呢個網站嘅界面大小喺我個顯示器度睇落唔係幾好。我覺得個網站有啲過時。Wikifx話佢嘅牌照係假嘅,搞到我都有啲驚,所以決定唔喺度交易。你哋有冇可靠嘅期權平台可以推薦?
中評
FX2372073304
台灣
由一位女性朋友,介紹認識做美金平台的人,剛開始前兩次都順利出金,去做外匯指定時間內都沒有,虧損狀態,對方給了一個專案,彩金回饋9999美金,需入5.2W,完成後又是會員加入要38888美金的問題,時間內沒完成需負擔總金額10%,又補完要出金了,平台說流水號不夠×5次(全部要出金的時候都同樣的話)又在做美金,歐元,日元外匯交易流水號,都賺到錢,對方有時說押漲,可是我就會按錯,按跌,完全沒輸到任何錢,在最後這次流水號做好了,款項來到了221,345元美金就,要出金謝,平台給了一個多方入帳,洗黑錢嫌疑的名稱,無法出金,需補20%,44269美金做擔保,7日內審核通過之後,沒有任何嫌疑,才會把擔保金44269美元歸還,其於221,345美元還是無法出金
爆料