StoneX

According to WikiFX data, StoneX has a core score of 6.25 and is classified as Regulated. The brand operates through multiple legal entities, including STONEX FINANCIAL LTD regulated by the UK FCA, StoneX Financial (HK) Limited regulated by the Hong Kong SFC, and STONEX FINANCIAL PTE. LTD. regulated by the Singapore MAS. Some other entities listed under the StoneX brand, such as those associated with ASIC, Japan FSA, and NFA, are marked as Unverified. Regulatory protection depends on the specific legal entity, license status, product, and client jurisdiction. A WikiFX score and listed licenses do not by themselves guarantee safety or reliability. Users should verify the relevant entity and current license status for their circumstances.

According to WikiFX data, StoneX is classified as Regulated. The license list includes: United Kingdom FCA Market Making License (MM) held by STONEX FINANCIAL LTD, status Regulated, regulation number 446717; Hong Kong SFC Derivatives Trading License (AGN) held by StoneX Financial (HK) Limited, status Regulated, regulation number BCQ152; and Singapore MAS Market Making License (MM) held by STONEX FINANCIAL PTE. LTD., status Regulated, regulation number Unreleased. There are also entries marked Unverified: Australia ASIC Market Making License (MM) held by STONEX FINANCIAL PTY LTD, regulation number 345646; Japan FSA Market Making License (MM) held by ＳｔｏｎｅＸ証券株式会社, regulation number 関東財務局長（金商）第291号; and United States NFA Forex Trading License (EP) held by GAIN CAPITAL GROUP LLC, regulation number 0339826. No abnormal licenses are listed. Licenses belong to specific legal entities and should not be assumed to cover every entity operating under the StoneX brand.

According to WikiFX data, the minimum deposit requirement for StoneX is not currently publicly specified. Account and transaction term details are listed as empty, so no specific minimum deposit figure can be confirmed. Users should check directly with the relevant StoneX legal entity for account opening requirements.

According to WikiFX data, there is no specific information listed about whether StoneX supports MT4 or MT5. The software index is 5.31, but platform support details are not currently publicly specified. Users should verify platform availability directly with the relevant StoneX entity.

According to WikiFX data, StoneX is classified as Regulated, with a core score of 6.25. Pros: 1) The brand operates through multiple legal entities with regulated licenses, including FCA, SFC, and MAS entries. 2) It has an operating history of 5–10 years and a global business scope. 3) WikiFX data shows positive user feedback regarding product diversity, global payment solutions, customer support, and execution speed. Cons: 1) Some entities associated with the brand, including ASIC, Japan FSA, and NFA entries, are marked as Unverified. 2) Several user exposure posts describe withdrawal difficulties, account access issues, and requests for additional payments. 3) Minimum deposit, account type, fee, and leverage details are not currently publicly specified in the WikiFX data.

According to WikiFX data, there are user complaints and exposure posts associated with StoneX. These posts describe withdrawal difficulties, account access issues, and requests for additional payments. WikiFX data also includes some positive and neutral user feedback. The presence of complaints does not by itself establish wrongdoing, and individual reviews may be subjective.

According to WikiFX data, StoneX is registered in the United States and has a global business scope. The license list includes a United States NFA Forex Trading License (EP) entry for GAIN CAPITAL GROUP LLC, but that entry is marked as Unverified. The data does not explicitly state all services available to US clients or the conditions for US residents. Availability may depend on the specific legal entity, product, and applicable regulations. Users in the US should verify directly with the relevant entity and regulator.

According to WikiFX data, there is no specific assessment of whether StoneX is suitable for beginners. StoneX is classified as Regulated and has a core score of 6.25. However, minimum deposit, account types, demo account availability, trading platform support, and fee transparency details are not currently publicly specified. Therefore, beginner suitability cannot be determined from WikiFX data alone. Beginners should consider the specific legal entity, regulatory status, account requirements, risk controls, and customer support before making any decision.

Due to the temporary lack of sufficient fee data, it is not possible to directly determine its commission and spread levels. In general, to judge a broker's trading costs, you can evaluate the following aspects: 1. Spread levels: Spreads are one of the main trading costs. Usually, the lower the spread, the lower the trading cost. 2. Commission structure: Some accounts use a "low spread + commission" model. The total cost needs to be calculated together. 3. Differences between account types: Different account types (such as Standard accounts and ECN accounts) may have different fee structures and should be compared separately. 4. Swap fees: Holding positions overnight may generate extra fees, which should be checked in advance. 5. Hidden fees: Check whether there are hidden charges, such as account management fees, inactive account fees, or additional deposit and withdrawal fees. It is recommended that you evaluate trading costs based on the factors above. At the same time, you can follow updates from WikiFX on fee data and ratings to get more accurate evaluation results.

According to WikiFX data, user reviews for StoneX are mixed. Some users give positive feedback about product diversity, global payment solutions, customer support, and execution speed. Other users, including several exposure posts, describe withdrawal difficulties, account access issues, and requests for additional payments. There are also neutral comments about interface design and learning curve. Individual reviews may be subjective and should be considered alongside other information.

To compare different brokers, investors can make comprehensive judgments from multiple dimensions such as regulatory qualifications, overall ratings, trading environment, account conditions, and user feedback. In general, priority should be given to regulatory status and license information, followed by WikiFX ratings and various indexes (such as risk control, software, and business indexes). At the same time, trading conditions (such as spreads and execution speed) and account information (such as minimum deposit and account types) should also be compared. In addition, user reviews, exposure records, and risk assessment information can also be considered to evaluate broker safety and trading experience from multiple aspects. The WikiFX platform also provides multi-dimensional broker comparison tools. Users can select different brokers for visual comparison and comprehensive analysis, so as to make decisions more efficiently.

WikiFX is a third-party platform that provides forex broker information inquiry and risk alerts. This type of platform mainly integrates brokers' regulatory information, user feedback, and historical records, and conducts comprehensive evaluation through a multi-dimensional model to help investors quickly understand the broker's basic situation and potential risks. By using such tools, investors can conduct preliminary screening before choosing a broker, thereby reducing decision-making risks caused by information asymmetry.

A broker can be evaluated as a potential scam platform by considering multiple factors such as regulatory qualifications, user complaints, fund security, and platform data. In general, brokers without valid regulation, those that frequently have withdrawal problems, those with a large number of user complaints, or those providing false information usually carry higher risks. You can check the broker's regulatory status, overall rating, exposure records, and user reviews on the WikiFX platform, and make judgments based on multi-dimensional data to effectively identify and avoid scam platform risks.

Common forex regulatory authorities include the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). These regulatory authorities usually maintain relatively high regulatory standards, and brokers regulated by them generally have higher compliance levels. You can check broker ranking lists under different regulators on the WikiFX platform, such as brokers regulated by FCA, ASIC, and CySEC, so as to compare brokers under different regulatory backgrounds more clearly and make safer choices.

If a broker holds multiple regulatory licenses, it usually means that it operates in multiple countries or regions and needs to comply with the requirements of different regulatory authorities. Its overall credibility is generally higher. However, it should be noted that regulatory strength differs between licenses. Some offshore regulations have weaker restrictions, so safety should not be judged only by the number of licenses. It is recommended to focus on whether the broker holds licenses from major regulators such as FCA or ASIC, and evaluate its regulatory status, historical records, and overall rating together. You can also check all regulatory information and performance under different regulators on the WikiFX platform to more comprehensively assess its actual risk level.