天眼评分
Maven
https://www.mavensecurities.com/
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
B
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
持牌机构:Maven Europe Ltd
监管证号:770542
- 该交易商WikiFX实勘差评已达到1条,请注意风险,谨防受害!
浏览 Maven 的用户还浏览了..
CPT Markets
PU Prime
搜索来源
投放语言
市场分析
素材投放
官网鉴定
mavensecurities.com
178.79.137.193服务器所在地英国
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称--所属公司--
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| Maven评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 2010 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 英国 |
| 监管 | FCA(已超出) |
| 客户支持 | 电话:+44 203 668 0767 |
| 地址:伦敦,EC2M 3TQ,Bishopsgate 155号7楼 | |
Maven信息
Maven声称是一家市场领先的专营交易公司,成立于2010年,专注于安全市场。其由英国金融行为监管局(FCA)颁发的许可已超出。

优缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| 历史悠久 | 超出FCA许可 |
| 缺乏透明度 |
Maven是否合法?
否。Maven目前没有有效的监管。它只持有超出的FCA许可。请注意风险!
| 监管状态 | 已超出 |
| 监管机构 | 英国金融行为监管局(FCA) |
| 持牌机构 | Maven欧洲有限公司 |
| 许可类型 | 投资咨询许可 |
| 许可号码 | 770542 |

企业画像
- 5-10年
- 英国监管
- 投资咨询牌照
- 区域性交易商
- 涉嫌超限经营
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Could you break down the total trading costs for indices such as the US100 when trading through Maven?
Based on my experience as a trader, it is absolutely essential to thoroughly understand a broker’s cost structure before committing any funds, especially with something as commonly traded as the US100 index. With Maven, however, I found it notably difficult to pin down reliable details about their trading costs for indices like the US100. The broker's available information struck me as lacking in transparency, which is a significant red flag when evaluating trading expenses such as spreads, commissions, and overnight fees. What’s more concerning is Maven’s current regulatory standing. According to the information I found, their FCA license has been exceeded, meaning they no longer operate under active, recognized supervision. This places them in a high-risk category for traders like myself, and brings even more doubt regarding the clarity and fairness of their cost structures. In my view, when a broker cannot offer straightforward, up-to-date information about trading costs for major indices and lacks valid regulation, the risks of hidden fees or unfair pricing increase substantially. Given these issues, I cannot accurately break down the total costs for trading indices like the US100 with Maven, and I would advise extreme caution. Informed decision-making starts with transparency and firm regulatory protections—elements currently missing with this broker. For me, until these fundamentals are addressed, I would not proceed with live trading of indices through Maven.
What is the smallest withdrawal amount allowed from my Maven account in a single transaction?
As someone who approaches broker selection with caution—especially when it comes to withdrawals and fund safety—I always prioritize regulatory clarity before any operational factor, like minimum withdrawal amounts. In Maven’s case, a deeper look into the available information gives me pause. While the broker is registered in the UK and claims several years of operation, I could not find any official, specific details regarding the minimum amount permitted for a single withdrawal from a Maven account. This absence of transparent withdrawal policies is concerning for me as a trader, since it makes it difficult to plan and manage funds with confidence. Even more important, Maven’s previous regulation through the FCA is listed as “exceeded,” meaning they currently no longer have a valid regulatory license. Warnings about high potential risk and lack of clarity on critical details reinforce my hesitation. Given the number of unaddressed questions—including basic ones like withdrawal minimums—I would personally exercise extreme caution and would avoid committing funds until Maven offers clear, up-to-date policies and can demonstrate genuine, ongoing regulatory compliance. In my experience, any broker that cannot readily disclose such terms may not be a safe choice for managing one’s trading capital.
Which types of trading instruments does Maven offer, such as forex, stocks, indices, cryptocurrencies, and commodities?
Based on my research and review of Maven as an experienced trader, I found that the broker’s core focus is primarily in the securities market rather than being a typical multi-asset forex broker. Maven describes itself as a proprietary trading firm, and while it is registered in the United Kingdom and has been around for several years, their offering does not appear to explicitly detail access to a broad range of retail trading instruments like forex, stocks, indices, cryptocurrencies, or commodities. Instead, Maven’s primary activity is described as proprietary trading and investment advisory—a model quite different from standard brokers that provide retail trading accounts with direct access to various markets. The information on their official site and regulatory details reinforce this more specialized, institution-centric structure. Given my risk-aware approach, I must stress that there are significant transparency issues regarding the specific types of instruments available for individual traders, and there is no clear evidence of standard forex, index, commodity, or cryptocurrency trading for retail clients. For someone seeking diverse and transparent access to multiple asset classes, I would be cautious with Maven due to this lack of clarity and focus on proprietary trading. Always ensure you have full understanding of instrument availability and broker structure before considering any engagement.
Are there any inactivity fees with Maven, and under what circumstances might they apply?
Speaking from my own perspective as an independent forex trader, I did not find any specific, transparent information regarding inactivity fees or the conditions under which they would apply with Maven. When evaluating any broker, especially one like Maven which raises regulatory concerns—such as their FCA license being listed as “exceeded” and warnings about high potential risk—I always pay extra attention to such operational details. The absence of documented fees, including inactivity charges, is a red flag for me; it suggests a lack of transparency which may expose traders to unexpected costs down the line. In my personal risk management routine, I need clear, upfront details about all possible charges before committing funds. Without verifiable information or explicit disclosures about inactivity fees from Maven, I consider it prudent to proceed with caution. It is my view that clarity around fee structures is vital to protect my capital and planning, and any broker that cannot provide this raises questions about overall trustworthiness. I would urge anyone to seek direct, written confirmation from Maven’s official representatives before making any assumptions about fee practices, and to be aware that the lack of transparency itself constitutes a notable risk.
你要评价的内容
请输入...
