Điểm
Instreet
http://www.instreet.com.au/
Website
Chỉ số đánh giá
Mức ảnh hưởng
Mức ảnh hưởng
D
Mức ảnh hưởng NO.1
Liên hệ
Cơ quan sở hữu giấy phép:Instreet Investment Limited
Số giấy phép cai quản:434776
Đơn lõi
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- Sàn môi giới này đã nhận được 1 phản hồi khảo sát thực tế tiêu cực, xin hãy lưu ý đề phòng rủi ro!
Người dùng đã xem Instreet cũng đã xem..
XM
GTCFX
CPT Markets
GO Markets
Website
instreet.com.au
162.241.226.175Vị trí ServerHoa Kỳ
Số lưu hồ sơ--Quốc gia/khu vực phổ biến--Thời gian thành lập tên miền--Website--Công ty--
Sơ đồ quan hệ
Tag sàn môi giới
Giới thiệu doanh nghiệp
| Instreet Tóm tắt Đánh giá | |
| Thành lập | 2002 |
| Quốc gia/Vùng đăng ký | Australia |
| Quy định | ASIC |
| Công cụ Thị trường | Tài sản phái sinh, tùy chọn, chỉ số, ETFs |
| Tài khoản Demo | ❌ |
| Đòn bẩy | / |
| Spread | / |
| Nền tảng Giao dịch | / |
| Yêu cầu Tiền gửi Tối thiểu | / |
| Hỗ trợ Khách hàng | Mẫu liên hệ |
| Điện thoại: +61 1300 954 678 | |
| Email: info@instreet.com.au | |
| X: https://x.com/gl_instreet | |
| YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/gsmhlucas | |
| LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gslucas | |
Thông tin về Instreet
Instreet là một nhà cung cấp dịch vụ tài chính được quy định, cung cấp các sản phẩm cấu trúc như Instreet Masti S&P500 và Instreet Masti S&P/ASX200, cùng với những sản phẩm khác. Instreet cũng cung cấp các lựa chọn thu nhập đều đặn và các giải pháp tùy chỉnh cho nhà đầu tư tinh vi. Thông qua Trung tâm Kiến thức của mình, nó cung cấp tài nguyên giáo dục về nhiều chủ đề đầu tư khác nhau.

Ưu điểm và Nhược điểm
| Ưu điểm | Nhược điểm |
| Được quy định bởi ASIC | Không có tài khoản demo |
| Dải sản phẩm đầu tư đa dạng | Thông tin hạn chế về điều kiện giao dịch |
| Các kênh liên hệ đa dạng | |
| Tài nguyên giáo dục đầu tư toàn diện |
Instreet Có Uy tín không?
Vâng. Instreet được cấp phép bởi Ủy ban Chứng khoán & Đầu tư Úc (ASIC), hoạt động dưới hình thức Straight Through Processing (STP) với số giấy phép 434776.
| Cơ quan Quản lý | Tình trạng Hiện tại | Thực Thể Được Cấp Phép | Quốc Gia Được Quản Lý | Loại Giấy Phép | Số Giấy Phép |
| Ủy ban Chứng khoán & Đầu tư Úc (ASIC) | Được Quản lý | Instreet Investment Limited | Úc | Straight Through Processing (STP) | 434776 |


Tôi Có Thể Giao Dịch Gì trên Instreet?
| Tài Sản Giao Dịch Được | Được Hỗ Trợ |
| Phái Sinh | ✔ |
| Tùy Chọn | ✔ |
| Chỉ Số | ✔ |
| ETFs | ✔ |
| Forex | ❌ |
| Hàng Hóa | ❌ |
| Cổ Phiếu | ❌ |
| Tiền Điện Tử | ❌ |
| Trái Phiếu | ❌ |

Tóm tắt về công ty
- 10-15 năm
- Đăng ký tại Nước Úc
- Sàn đẩy lệnh (STP)
- Lĩnh vực nghiệp vụ đáng ngờ
- Nguy cơ rủi ro cao
Hỏi & Đáp về Wiki
Is a free demo account available with Instreet, and if so, are there any restrictions such as a time limit?
In my assessment of Instreet, I found that, unlike many platforms I’ve evaluated over the years, they do not offer a free demo account. For me, this presents a notable limitation, especially for traders who rely on demo environments to familiarize themselves with a broker’s products and interface before committing real capital. In my own trading journey, the absence of a demo account means I can’t test their offering firsthand or gauge essential elements like execution speed, spread, or platform stability without putting my funds at risk. I consider this particularly important given Instreet’s focus on structured products, derivatives, and options—areas that can carry significant complexity and risk. Without a demo environment, practicing these products or evaluating risk-management features is not possible in a risk-free setting. There is also no indication from my research that Instreet provides demo access with any time limitation or with unrestricted features. Given the lack of transparency around trading conditions and the absence of a practice account, I feel it’s essential to approach trading with Instreet cautiously, especially if you value the opportunity to assess a broker’s suitability before making a financial commitment. For me, this factor would weigh heavily in my broker selection process.
In what ways does Instreet’s regulatory status help safeguard my funds?
From my experience as a trader, the regulatory status of a broker is one of the first things I check before entrusting them with my funds. Instreet is licensed under the Australia Securities & Investment Commission (ASIC), which is generally regarded as a rigorous regulator. ASIC’s role is to set and enforce standards designed to ensure licensed financial service providers adhere to fair practices, including capital adequacy, segregation of client money, and transparent reporting. For me, this kind of oversight means that Instreet must follow strict operational guidelines, which in theory helps minimize the risks of mismanagement or misuse of client funds. However, while ASIC regulation is reassuring, it’s important to note that no regulatory framework offers complete protection, and investors still need to practice due diligence. I also noticed that WikiFX flags a "suspicious scope of business" and a "high potential risk" at Instreet, and this kind of warning increases my caution. Regulated status, therefore, is just a foundation; it does foster more accountability and transparency, but it doesn’t eliminate all risks related to trading. This is why I always recommend maintaining a cautious approach, especially in environments where certain red flags have been noted.
Can you tell me the highest leverage Instreet provides on major forex pairs, and how does that differ for other types of assets?
As an experienced trader, when I examined Instreet, I specifically looked for clear information about leverage offered on major forex pairs—since leverage is a crucial risk factor in our industry. However, based on my careful review of Instreet's disclosures, I could not find any mention that they offer trading in forex pairs at all. Instead, Instreet appears to focus on structured products, derivatives, options, indices, and ETFs. There is no available detail about leverage for major forex pairs or, in fact, any leverage specifications for other asset types on their platform. For me, this lack of transparency around product specifications and leverage is a significant concern. In my own trading decisions, I prioritize brokers who explicitly state margin requirements and leverage limits for each instrument. Not only does this help manage risk, but it is also a sign of clarity and professionalism. While it's positive that Instreet is regulated by ASIC, the high-risk label and "suspicious scope of business" warning on their profile make me extra cautious. Until Instreet publishes full details on what leverage—if any—is available for their offerings, I cannot comment further or compare them to industry norms for forex or other products. For my portfolio, I require complete transparency before considering any engagement.
Could you break down the total trading costs involved when trading indices such as the US100 on Instreet?
As a trader with years of experience evaluating brokers, I always pay close attention to transparency around trading costs. When considering Instreet for trading indices like the US100, I found it challenging to get a clear understanding of the total trading costs due to Instreet's limited public disclosure on spreads, commissions, leverage, or minimum deposit requirements. While Instreet is regulated by ASIC and operates under a Straight Through Processing (STP) license, I noticed that there’s scant information available regarding trading conditions—especially those directly affecting trading costs. From my research, Instreet specializes more in structured investment products and index-linked solutions rather than offering traditional forex or CFD trading platforms. There’s no mention of demo accounts or detailed contract specifications, so I couldn’t obtain concrete figures for spreads or transaction fees on the US100 or other indices. Without these key details, I found it nearly impossible to calculate potential total trading costs for active trading strategies. Because indices trading costs typically comprise spread, commission, and any swap or overnight holding fees, the lack of precise data means I would exercise significant caution before committing funds. Personally, I look for brokers with clear, upfront disclosures about all trading expenses. In the absence of such transparency at Instreet, I would be wary of hidden or unpredictable costs, and I would recommend contacting their customer service directly for up-to-date, detailed cost information before proceeding.
Nội dung bình luận
Vui lòng nhập...

Chrome
Chrome extension
Yêu cầu về quy định của nhà môi giới ngoại hối toàn cầu
Đánh giá nhanh chóng website của các sàn giao dịch
Tải ngay