天眼评分
Instreet
http://www.instreet.com.au/
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
D
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
持牌机构:Instreet Investment Limited
监管证号:434776
单核
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 该交易商WikiFX实勘差评已达到1条,请注意风险,谨防受害!
浏览 Instreet 的用户还浏览了..
Vantage
AVATRADE
官网鉴定
instreet.com.au
162.241.226.175服务器所在地美国
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称--所属公司--
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| Instreet 评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 2002 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 澳大利亚 |
| 监管 | ASIC |
| 市场工具 | 衍生品、期权、指数、ETFs |
| 模拟账户 | ❌ |
| 杠杆 | / |
| 点差 | / |
| 交易平台 | / |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客户支持 | 联系表单 |
| 电话:+61 1300 954 678 | |
| 邮箱:info@instreet.com.au | |
| X:https://x.com/gl_instreet | |
| YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/user/gsmhlucas | |
| LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/gslucas | |
Instreet 信息
Instreet 是一家受监管的金融服务提供商,提供结构化产品,如 Instreet Masti S&P500 和 Instreet Masti S&P/ASX200 等。Instreet 还为复杂投资者提供定期收入选择和量身定制的解决方案。通过其知识中心,提供涵盖各种投资主题的教育资源。

优点和缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| 受ASIC监管 | 无演示 账户 |
| 多样化的投资解决方案 | 交易条件信息有限 |
| 多种联系渠道 | |
| 全面的投资者教育资源 |
Instreet 是否合法?
是的。Instreet受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管,持有执照号码434776,采用直通处理(STP)模式运营。
| 监管机构 | 当前状态 | 持牌实体 | 监管国家 | 许可证类型 | 许可证号码 |
| 澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC) | 监管 | Instreet投资有限公司 | 澳大利亚 | 直通处理(STP) | 434776 |


Instreet可以交易什么?
| 可交易资产 | 支持 |
| 衍生品 | ✔ |
| 期权 | ✔ |
| 指数 | ✔ |
| 交易所交易基金(ETFs) | ✔ |
| 外汇 | ❌ |
| 大宗商品 | ❌ |
| 股票 | ❌ |
| 加密货币 | ❌ |
| 债券 | ❌ |

企业画像
- 10-15年
- 澳大利亚监管
- 直通牌照(STP)
- 展业区域存疑
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Is a free demo account available with Instreet, and if so, are there any restrictions such as a time limit?
In my assessment of Instreet, I found that, unlike many platforms I’ve evaluated over the years, they do not offer a free demo account. For me, this presents a notable limitation, especially for traders who rely on demo environments to familiarize themselves with a broker’s products and interface before committing real capital. In my own trading journey, the absence of a demo account means I can’t test their offering firsthand or gauge essential elements like execution speed, spread, or platform stability without putting my funds at risk. I consider this particularly important given Instreet’s focus on structured products, derivatives, and options—areas that can carry significant complexity and risk. Without a demo environment, practicing these products or evaluating risk-management features is not possible in a risk-free setting. There is also no indication from my research that Instreet provides demo access with any time limitation or with unrestricted features. Given the lack of transparency around trading conditions and the absence of a practice account, I feel it’s essential to approach trading with Instreet cautiously, especially if you value the opportunity to assess a broker’s suitability before making a financial commitment. For me, this factor would weigh heavily in my broker selection process.
In what ways does Instreet’s regulatory status help safeguard my funds?
From my experience as a trader, the regulatory status of a broker is one of the first things I check before entrusting them with my funds. Instreet is licensed under the Australia Securities & Investment Commission (ASIC), which is generally regarded as a rigorous regulator. ASIC’s role is to set and enforce standards designed to ensure licensed financial service providers adhere to fair practices, including capital adequacy, segregation of client money, and transparent reporting. For me, this kind of oversight means that Instreet must follow strict operational guidelines, which in theory helps minimize the risks of mismanagement or misuse of client funds. However, while ASIC regulation is reassuring, it’s important to note that no regulatory framework offers complete protection, and investors still need to practice due diligence. I also noticed that WikiFX flags a "suspicious scope of business" and a "high potential risk" at Instreet, and this kind of warning increases my caution. Regulated status, therefore, is just a foundation; it does foster more accountability and transparency, but it doesn’t eliminate all risks related to trading. This is why I always recommend maintaining a cautious approach, especially in environments where certain red flags have been noted.
Can you tell me the highest leverage Instreet provides on major forex pairs, and how does that differ for other types of assets?
As an experienced trader, when I examined Instreet, I specifically looked for clear information about leverage offered on major forex pairs—since leverage is a crucial risk factor in our industry. However, based on my careful review of Instreet's disclosures, I could not find any mention that they offer trading in forex pairs at all. Instead, Instreet appears to focus on structured products, derivatives, options, indices, and ETFs. There is no available detail about leverage for major forex pairs or, in fact, any leverage specifications for other asset types on their platform. For me, this lack of transparency around product specifications and leverage is a significant concern. In my own trading decisions, I prioritize brokers who explicitly state margin requirements and leverage limits for each instrument. Not only does this help manage risk, but it is also a sign of clarity and professionalism. While it's positive that Instreet is regulated by ASIC, the high-risk label and "suspicious scope of business" warning on their profile make me extra cautious. Until Instreet publishes full details on what leverage—if any—is available for their offerings, I cannot comment further or compare them to industry norms for forex or other products. For my portfolio, I require complete transparency before considering any engagement.
Could you break down the total trading costs involved when trading indices such as the US100 on Instreet?
As a trader with years of experience evaluating brokers, I always pay close attention to transparency around trading costs. When considering Instreet for trading indices like the US100, I found it challenging to get a clear understanding of the total trading costs due to Instreet's limited public disclosure on spreads, commissions, leverage, or minimum deposit requirements. While Instreet is regulated by ASIC and operates under a Straight Through Processing (STP) license, I noticed that there’s scant information available regarding trading conditions—especially those directly affecting trading costs. From my research, Instreet specializes more in structured investment products and index-linked solutions rather than offering traditional forex or CFD trading platforms. There’s no mention of demo accounts or detailed contract specifications, so I couldn’t obtain concrete figures for spreads or transaction fees on the US100 or other indices. Without these key details, I found it nearly impossible to calculate potential total trading costs for active trading strategies. Because indices trading costs typically comprise spread, commission, and any swap or overnight holding fees, the lack of precise data means I would exercise significant caution before committing funds. Personally, I look for brokers with clear, upfront disclosures about all trading expenses. In the absence of such transparency at Instreet, I would be wary of hidden or unpredictable costs, and I would recommend contacting their customer service directly for up-to-date, detailed cost information before proceeding.
你要评价的内容
请输入...
