점수
OMEGA
https://www.omegainvest.com.cy/
공식 사이트
평점 지수
영향력
영향력
D
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
라이선스 기관:Omega Funds Investment Ltd
라이선스 번호:102/09
싱글 코어
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 이 브로커의 현장 조사 나쁜 평가 수는 1개에 달했습니다. 위험과 잠재적인 사기에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
OMEGA 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
EC Markets
IC Markets Global
Exness
STARTRADER
웹사이트 감정
omegainvest.com.cy
195.14.130.20서버 위치키프로스
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜--웹사이트 이름--회사--
관계 계보
관련 기업
회사 소개
| OMEGA 리뷰 요약 | |
| 설립 연도 | 2008 |
| 등록 국가/지역 | 키프로스 |
| 규제 | CYSEC 규제 |
| 시장 상품 | 증권, 통화, 옵션 및 선물 |
| 데모 계정 | / |
| 레버리지 | / |
| 스프레드 | / |
| 거래 플랫폼 | WTS (IB) 및 OTS 거래 플랫폼 |
| 최소 입금액 | / |
| 고객 지원 | 팩스: +357 25028929 |
| 전화: +357 25028920 | |
| 이메일: info@omegainvest.com | |
| 주소: 키프로스 리마쏠 아티아나시오스 구, 케노스 빌딩 2호, 202호 | |
OMEGA 정보
OMEGA은 2008년에 설립된 규제된 브로커입니다. 키프로스에 등록된 OMEGA은 CYSEC의 규제 감독 하에 WTS (IB) 및 OTS 플랫폼에서 투자 서비스, 부가 서비스, 금융 상품을 제공합니다.

장단점
| 장점 | 단점 |
| 잘 규제됨 | MT4/MT5 플랫폼 없음 |
| 운영 시간이 길다 | 규제 주소와 실제 주소 불일치 |
| 다양한 연락 채널 | 거래 조건에 대한 정보 제한적 |
| 다양한 서비스 및 제품 |
OMEGA 합법적인가요?
OMEGA 자금 투자 유한회사는 CySEC의 규제 감독 하에 시장 메이킹 (MM) 라이선스 번호 102/09로 운영합니다.
| 규제 국가 | 규제 기관 | 현재 상태 | 규제 업체 | 라이선스 유형 | 라이선스 번호 |
| 키프로스 | 키프로스증권거래위원회 (CySEC) | 규제됨 | 오메가 펀드 투자 유한회사 | 마켓 메이커 (MM) | 102/09 |

위키FX 현장 조사
위키FX 현장 조사팀이 키프로스의 OMEGA 주소를 방문했습니다. 실제 주소가 규제 주소와 일치하지 않음을 발견했습니다. 리스크를 인식해주시기 바랍니다!

OMEGA에서 무엇을 거래할 수 있나요?
브로커는 증권, 통화, 옵션, 및 선물과 같은 금융상품을 포함하여 투자 서비스, 부가 서비스를 제공합니다.
| 거래 자산 | 지원됨 |
| 증권 | ✔ |
| 통화 | ✔ |
| 옵션 | ✔ |
| 선물 | ✔ |
| 상품 | ❌ |
| 지수 | ❌ |
| 주식 | ❌ |
| 암호화폐 | ❌ |
| 채권 | ❌ |
| ETFs | ❌ |


계정 유형
오메가는 소매 고객, 전문 고객 또는 적격 상대자를 위한 맞춤형 계정 유형을 제공합니다. 그러나 특정 계정 기능은 공개되지 않았습니다.

거래 플랫폼
OMEGA은 고객에게 두 가지 다른 거래 플랫폼인 WTS (IB)와 OTS를 제공합니다.
| 거래 플랫폼 | 지원됨 |
| WTS (IB) | ✔ |
| OTS | ✔ |

키워드
- 15-20년
- 키프로스에 규제
- 마켓 메이커 (MM)
- 업무 구역 의심
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
Can I trust OMEGA as a reliable and secure broker for my trading needs?
Having traded independently for over a decade, I’ve learned to approach any broker with careful scrutiny, especially where my funds and data are concerned. With OMEGA, a few points stand out. The broker is regulated by CySEC in Cyprus and has been operating for more than 15 years, which does provide a measure of credibility and stability compared to unregulated entities. I do value regulatory oversight because it generally means some level of investor protection and accountability, but Cyprus regulation is not viewed as strict as some of the more established regulators in other jurisdictions. That said, my caution is heightened by WikiFX’s note regarding a mismatch between OMEGA’s regulatory and actual business addresses—a factor that can signal administrative inconsistencies or insufficient transparency. For me, physical transparency is important as it reflects a broker’s genuine intention to serve clients rather than avoid oversight. Additionally, OMEGA does not offer popular trading platforms like MT4 or MT5, only supporting WTS (IB) and OTS, which could complicate seamless integration with my existing workflows or trading tools. There’s also limited information available publicly on spreads, leverage, or trading conditions, making it difficult for me to fully evaluate the broker’s costs and suitability for my strategies. In my experience, while OMEGA’s long regulatory track record and product diversity (currencies, options, futures, and securities) are pluses, the combination of a suspicious business scope alert and lack of transparency in core trading details does make me hesitant. Personally, I would not commit significant capital until I had greater clarity and had directly tested their platforms and support. For those who value security and openness as highly as I do, proceeding cautiously and continuing to monitor for updates is prudent.
How high can the leverage go with OMEGA for major forex pairs, and does the leverage differ for other types of assets?
In my detailed research on OMEGA, I found that the broker does not disclose specific details regarding leverage for major forex pairs or other asset classes. This lack of transparency is concerning to me, as leverage policies critically impact both potential profits and, more importantly, the risks traders assume. With OMEGA being regulated by CySEC, my expectation would be that leverage should align with European Union requirements—typically, this means a maximum of 1:30 for retail clients trading major FX pairs. However, since OMEGA offers different account categories such as Retail, Professional, or Eligible Counterparties, it's possible that higher leverage could be available for those who qualify as professional clients, though again, these terms are not detailed. For me, the absence of clear leverage information, especially regarding instruments beyond forex like options and futures, significantly limits my confidence in fully evaluating their risk environment. I strongly believe that understanding leverage terms—and how they might differ across asset classes—is essential for prudent risk management, especially when considering a broker flagged for having a suspicious business scope and high potential risk by industry watchlists. Until OMEGA publicly outlines their leverage conditions for each asset type, I would remain cautious and thoroughly seek clarification from their support before considering opening an account.
How do the different account types provided by OMEGA compare to each other?
Having traded with a variety of brokers over the years, I always pay special attention to account types and how transparently they’re presented. With OMEGA, while it’s clear that accounts are tailored for three groups—Retail Clients, Professional Clients, and Eligible Counterparties—the lack of detailed information on specific account features stands out to me. For me, this makes it challenging to make a direct, informed comparison between the accounts, especially compared to brokers that layout minimum deposit requirements, spreads, leverage, or specific benefits for each tier upfront. This limited transparency requires a cautious approach. I know from my experience that understanding precise account parameters—like trading costs or margin requirements—is essential for effective risk management and strategy planning. OMEGA does specify that it’s regulated by CySEC and that it offers standard financial instruments, which provides some reassurance about oversight, but without clear account specifics, I feel obligated to treat the offerings conservatively. In summary, while the segregation into client categories suggests an attempt to meet varying trader needs, the lack of public detail means, for me, that I would need to directly contact OMEGA or request further documentation to make any meaningful account comparison—and I'd be careful before making any commitments.
Are there any inactivity fees charged by OMEGA, and if they do apply, under what circumstances are they imposed?
Based on my thorough review of the available information about OMEGA, I was unable to find any mention of inactivity fees or the specific circumstances under which such charges might apply. As a trader who has evaluated many brokers over the years, I know that details on fees—especially less obvious ones like inactivity fees—can significantly impact a trading experience and the overall cost of maintaining an account. Often, reputable brokers will clearly outline potential charges in their account terms or fee schedules. In OMEGA’s case, the lack of transparency regarding trading conditions, including fees, stands out for me as a point of caution. In my own practice, I always seek full clarity on fee structures before committing to a broker, as hidden fees can erode profits over time. While OMEGA is regulated by CySEC, which usually imposes certain standards for disclosure, I could not locate any direct answers about inactivity fees from the publicly available materials. Without explicit confirmation, I would avoid making assumptions and instead recommend contacting OMEGA’s customer support directly for clarification before opening an account. Taking this cautious approach is, in my experience, essential when dealing with any potential unknowns, particularly with financial service providers.
댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....

