점수
RCB
https://www.rcbcy.com/
공식 사이트
평점 지수
영향력
영향력
C
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
효력 있는 규제 정보가 없습니다. 위험에 유의해 주세요!
- 이 브로커는 현재 효력 있는 규제가 없는 것으로 확인되었습니다. 위험에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
RCB 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
CPT Markets
GO Markets
MiTRADE
STARTRADER
검색 소스
노출 언어
시장 분석
소재 노출
웹사이트 감정
rcbcy.com
185.31.208.71서버 위치독일
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜--웹사이트 이름--회사--
관계 계보
관련 기업
회사 소개
| RCB 리뷰 요약 | |
| 설립 연도 | 2002 |
| 등록 국가 | 키프로스 |
| 규제 | 규제 없음 |
| 고객 지원 | 이메일: rcb@rcbcy.com |
| 주소: 키프로스 리마쏠 아마훈토스 거리 2 | |
RCB 정보
RCB은 2002년에 설립되어 키프로스에 등록되었습니다. CySEC이나 다른 주요 국제 금융 당국에 의해 규제되지 않았습니다. 현재 은행은 공식적으로 모든 금융 활동을 중단하고 투자 또는 은행 서비스를 더 이상 제공하지 않습니다.

장단점
| 장점 | 단점 |
| 긴 운영 역사 | 규제 없음 |
| 키프로스 시장에서 이전에 알려진 | 공식적으로 모든 서비스 중단 |
| 거래 플랫폼, 제품 또는 고객 도구 없음 |
RCB 합법적인가요?
RCB (rcbcy.com)은 규제되지 않은 브로커입니다. 키프로스에 등록되어 있지만, 키프로스의 공식 금융 규제 당국인 CySEC으로부터 라이선스를 보유하고 있지 않습니다.

Whois 데이터에 따르면, 도메인 rcbcy.com은 2002년 3월 21일에 등록되었으며, 마지막으로 2024년 3월 11일에 업데이트되었습니다. 현재 활성화되어 있으며 2029년 3월 21일에 만료될 예정입니다.

제품 및 서비스
RCB 은행의 공식 사이트 (rcbcy.com)은 은행이 모든 은행 활동을 중단했음을 확인합니다. 27년 동안의 신뢰에 감사드리는 폐쇄 공지가 표시됩니다. 도메인은 여전히 운영 중이지만, 사이트는 RCB이 더 이상 금융 서비스를 제공하지 않는 은행이나 브로커가 아니라고 주장합니다.
키워드
- 5-10년
- 의문 있는 규제 라이선스
- 업무 구역 의심
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
How do RCB’s overnight financing costs stack up against those of other brokers?
After a thorough review of RCB’s background and current status, I must state that evaluating their overnight financing costs—or any trading conditions—is effectively impossible at this time. My experience as a trader has taught me that regulatory status and transparency are essential foundations for assessing key aspects like swap rates. In RCB’s case, not only are they completely unregulated, but they have also officially ceased all financial and brokerage operations. Their website confirms the closure and withdrawal from all investment and banking services, which means there are no active trading platforms, instruments, or customer support channels. From my perspective, any historical information about RCB’s previous overnight financing costs is irrelevant today since the broker no longer provides any services to clients. Comparing RCB to active, regulated brokers—whose financing costs can be systematically evaluated—is, therefore, not applicable. For those seeking reliable overnight financing terms, I strongly recommend focusing only on brokers that are properly licensed and operational. Risk management, transparency, and the ability to access clear cost structures are simply not possible with entities like RCB at this stage. For me, the absence of valid regulation and the official shutdown make RCB a non-option; I wouldn’t consider them for trading, let alone for competitive financing rates.
Does RCB apply any fees when you deposit or withdraw funds?
Speaking as an experienced trader, I need to emphasize that RCB no longer provides any form of banking or trading services, including deposit or withdrawal functionality. The closure announcement on their official website clearly states that the bank has ceased all financial operations and no longer offers investment or banking activities. In practical terms, this means there are currently no deposit or withdrawal methods, so the question of whether any fees apply is now irrelevant. Back when RCB was operational, details about transaction fees would have been an important consideration for me—unexplained charges or non-transparent fee structures are clear warning signs and can significantly affect trading performance. However, given that RCB is not regulated and has officially stopped its financial activities, even attempting to interact with this entity carries extremely high risk. To protect my capital and personal information, I would personally avoid any involvement until there is legitimate, up-to-date regulatory oversight and clear public documentation of all client terms, including fees. My priority is always to seek out brokers with full transparency and active, verifiable regulation.
Does RCB charge a commission for each lot traded on their ECN or raw spread accounts?
After carefully researching RCB, I can say with confidence that it is not possible to determine any commission structure for ECN or raw spread accounts, simply because RCB no longer provides any financial or trading services. From my perspective as a forex trader, it is critical to confirm that a broker is both active and properly regulated before even considering their fee schedules or trading conditions. In RCB’s case, the most relevant fact is that the company, despite its previous presence in the Cyprus market, has officially ceased all services. Their website contains a notice about the termination of financial operations, and there are no trading platforms, products, or support tools currently available. Even during its active period, RCB’s lack of a CySEC or any recognized international brokerage license already represented a major red flag for me regarding safety and transparency. Without regulation, there’s no robust investor protection or oversight of trading terms—another reason I would approach any offerings, including potential commission models, with caution. Ultimately, since RCB is not operational, they do not charge commissions for any type of trading account, ECN or otherwise. For my own safety and peace of mind, I only consider brokers that are both fully regulated and demonstrably active in the market.
Is RCB overseen by regulators, and if so, which financial authorities are responsible for its regulation?
Based on my own experience and a careful review of the available facts, I can say that RCB is not overseen by any recognized regulatory authority. Although the company has a long history and is registered in Cyprus, it does not hold a license from CySEC or any other major international financial regulator. In my career, I have learned that regulatory oversight is not just a formality—it’s a critical foundation for trader protection, dispute resolution, and overall trust. Without regulation, there are no industry safeguards to ensure fair practices or compensation in the event of broker mismanagement or insolvency. From what I’ve seen, any financial entity lacking valid, transparent supervision introduces a much higher degree of risk for investors. This caution is doubly important here: not only does RCB lack regulation, but as of now, it has publicly ceased all banking and investment operations. As a trader, I would not consider entrusting funds or personal data to a company in this situation. For me, the “why” is straightforward: regulatory status isn’t just about legal requirements—it’s about risk management and confidence in every transaction. When a broker has no oversight at all, I simply move on and look for one that does.
댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....
