점수
GFFM
http://www.gffm.com/
공식 사이트
평점 지수
영향력
영향력
D
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
싱글 코어
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 이 브로커의 현장 조사 나쁜 평가 수는 1개에 달했습니다. 위험과 잠재적인 사기에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
GFFM 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
XM
HANTEC MARKETS
taurex
AVATRADE
웹사이트 감정
gffm.com
94.31.50.108서버 위치영국
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜1999-12-12웹사이트 이름WHOIS.GANDI.NET회사GANDI SAS
관계 계보
관련 기업
회사 소개
| GFFM 리뷰 요약 | |
| 설립 | 1976 |
| 등록 국가/지역 | 영국 |
| 규제 | FCA |
| 시장 상품 | 금속, 에너지, 소프트 상품 및 농산물 |
| 데모 계정 | ❌ |
| 레버리지 | / |
| 거래 플랫폼 | Patsystems (PATS), Trading Technologies (TT), ATP |
| 최소 입금액 | / |
| 고객 지원 | 문의 양식 |
| 전화: +44 (0) 20 7330 1688 | |
| 이메일: enquiries@uk.gffm.com | |
| 페이스북: https://www.facebook.com/ftmarketsglobal | |
| 인스타그램: https://www.instagram.com/ftmarketsglobal/ | |
| 주소: 1 Finsbury Square London EC2A 1AE UNITED KINGDOM | |
1976년에 설립된 GF Financial Markets (UK) Limited (GFFM)은 금속, 에너지, 소프트 상품, 농산물 및 금융 상품 거래 서비스를 제공하는 선물 및 옵션 브로커입니다. 영국 금융감독청(FCA)의 규제를 받으며 Patsystems (PATS), Trading Technologies (TT), ATP 세 가지 거래 플랫폼에 접속할 수 있습니다.

장단점
| 장점 | 단점 |
| 긴 운영 역사 | 데모 계정 없음 |
| FCA 규제 | 거래 조건에 대한 제한된 정보 |
| 다양한 거래 플랫폼 | 알려지지 않은 결제 방법 |
GFFM이 신뢰할 만한가요?
GFFM은 영국 금융감독청(FCA)에서 발급한 기관 외환 라이선스(라이선스 번호: 114237)를 보유한 합법적인 브로커입니다.
| 규제 국가 | 규제 기관 | 규제 업체 | 라이선스 유형 | 라이선스 번호 |
![]() | 영국 금융감독청(FCA) | GF Financial Markets (UK) Limited | 기관 외환 라이선스 | 114237 |

GFFM에서 무엇을 거래할 수 있나요?
GFFM은 상품 거래에 초점을 맞추고 있습니다.
- 금속: 금, 은, 백금과 같은 귀금속 및 기초 금속.
- 에너지: 원유 및 천연가스와 같은 인기 있는 에너지.
- 소프트 및 농업: 커피, 설탕, 밀과 같은 소프트 상품 및 농산물.
| 거래 가능한 상품 | 지원 여부 |
| 금속 | ✔ |
| 에너지 | ✔ |
| 소프트 및 농업 | ✔ |
| 외환 | ❌ |
| 지수 | ❌ |
| 주식 | ❌ |
| 암호화폐 | ❌ |
| 채권 | ❌ |
| 옵션 | ❌ |
| ETF | ❌ |

거래 플랫폼
GFFM은 다양하고 고급스러운 플랫폼을 제공하기 위해 노력하고 있습니다. 이에는 Patsystems (PATS), Trading Technologies (TT), ATP 등이 포함됩니다.
| 거래 플랫폼 | 지원 여부 | 사용 가능한 장치 | 적합 대상 |
| Patsystems (PATS) | ✔ | 웹 | / |
| Trading Technologies (TT) | ✔ | 웹 | / |
| ATP | ✔ | 웹 | / |
| MT4 | ❌ | / | 초보자 |
| MT5 | ❌ | / | 경험 있는 트레이더 |


키워드
- 20년 이상
- 영국에 규제
- 기관 외환 라이선스
- 업무 구역 의심
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
Based on your experience, what do you consider the three main benefits of using GFFM?
In my experience as a trader, what immediately stands out about GFFM is its long-standing presence and regulation in the United Kingdom. Founded in 1976 and overseen by the FCA, this level of oversight is essential for trust and transparency in a financial service provider. Having spent years evaluating brokers, I know that regulatory safeguards mitigate certain operational risks and mechanisms for client recourse exist in the FCA framework, though no regulation guarantees safety from every risk. Another aspect I value is GFFM’s specialization in commodities—particularly metals, energy, and agricultural products. For traders looking to access these markets specifically, GFFM’s focused offering provides tailored platforms (like Patsystems, Trading Technologies, and ATP) designed for futures and options on these instruments. This kind of specialization can translate to better execution quality and market access for commodities, which is not as common among forex-centric brokers. Finally, having over 20 years in business demonstrates an established track record. From my perspective, a lengthy operational history—combined with physical presence in London and defined contact details—does add a layer of reassurance regarding business continuity. Still, I always advise caution and recommend independent research, as some elements remain opaque, such as the lack of demo accounts and limited published info on account conditions. For me, GFFM’s regulatory status, commodity market focus, and business longevity make it notable, especially for those specifically interested in regulated commodity trading venues.
Is it possible to deposit funds into my GFFM account with cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or USDT?
Drawing from my personal experience as a trader and after a careful review of the available broker details, I need to be very cautious when it comes to deposit methods offered by GFFM. The information provided does not clarify or confirm any support for cryptocurrency funding such as Bitcoin or USDT. In fact, there is no explicit mention of accepted payment methods at all, which to me is a significant gap—particularly in the current trading environment where transparency around funding and withdrawal options is essential for building trust with any broker. For me, the absence of this information alone is a red flag. I always insist on verifying deposit and withdrawal policies before committing any capital, particularly with brokers that handle only specific markets or platforms. GFFM focuses on futures and commodities, does not support forex or digital assets trading, and its trading platforms (Patsystems, Trading Technologies, ATP) do not suggest any integration with digital currency wallets based on industry norms. Additionally, given that customer reviews and even regulatory details raise both positive history and some serious concerns (notably the classification of “High potential risk” and no physical office found during inspection), I would be doubly cautious. Until GFFM discloses official, detailed information about its funding options on its website or through direct support, I would not assume that cryptocurrency deposits via Bitcoin or USDT are possible—or safe—with this broker. As always, I recommend reaching out to the broker directly for the most current and verified funding methods, and never sending capital by any means that isn’t explicitly confirmed and securely documented by the regulated institution itself.
How do GFFM’s overnight financing (swap) fees stack up against those offered by other brokers?
From my firsthand experience and thorough due diligence, I’ve found that evaluating GFFM’s overnight financing (swap) fees is unfortunately not possible due to the lack of published information from the broker itself. When I attempted to compare swap rates—an important operating cost for leveraged traders—GFFM does not provide these figures transparently on their website or in available broker resources. In contrast, most reputable brokers make their overnight financing costs, whether positive or negative, clear either on their trading platforms or client portals, allowing for cost comparisons and proper strategy planning. This opacity is a significant drawback for me. Without published swap rates, I can’t determine if GFFM is competitive, expensive, or fair when it comes to holding positions overnight. Swap fees can have a substantial impact on long-term strategies, particularly with commodities and energy products—areas in which GFFM specializes. I am only comfortable allocating capital to brokers who make all trading costs, including overnight financing, explicit. This transparency is not just a matter of preference; it is vital for proper risk assessment, accounting, and compliance with best trading practices. Based on the information available, traders like myself should approach GFFM with caution until these fee structures are explicitly clarified, especially if overnight positions are part of their strategy.
Is a demo account available for free with GFFM, and if so, are there restrictions such as an expiration period?
From my careful review of GFFM, I found that they do not provide a free demo account option. As a trader who relies on testing execution speeds, order types, and platform stability before committing real capital, this is a significant limitation for me. In my experience, demo accounts serve as an invaluable tool for both new and experienced traders to familiarize themselves with a broker’s interface and trading conditions in a risk-free environment. The absence of this feature means I cannot properly assess GFFM’s platforms, such as Patsystems, Trading Technologies, or ATP, without first opening a live account and risking actual funds. For anyone considering GFFM, I urge caution, particularly if you are used to trying out a broker’s services through an unrestricted demo first. Without a demo, it’s much harder to evaluate factors like order execution, margin calculations, or even the overall suitability of the offered platforms for your trading style. Personally, I would hesitate to fund a new account with any broker that lacks this transparency, as risk mitigation and trust are paramount in trading decisions. I have not encountered evidence of expiration restrictions simply because demo accounts are not available at all according to my research.
댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....

