점수
FX Connect
https://www.fxconnect.com/
공식 사이트
평점 지수
영향력
영향력
D
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
효력 있는 규제 정보가 없습니다. 위험에 유의해 주세요!
- 이 브로커는 현재 효력 있는 규제가 없는 것으로 확인되었습니다. 위험에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
FX Connect 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
HANTEC MARKETS
GTCFX
fpmarkets
FBS
웹사이트 감정
fxconnect.com
208.89.235.202서버 위치미국
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜--웹사이트 이름--회사--
관계 계보
회사 소개
| FX Connect 리뷰 요약 | |
| 설립 연도 | 2003 |
| 등록 국가/지역 | 영국 |
| 규제 | 규제 없음 |
| 서비스 | 거래 유연성, 결제 솔루션, 거래 보고서, 워크플로우 관리 |
| 데모 계정 | ✅ |
| 플랫폼/앱 | TradeNeXusSM |
| 고객 지원 | 문의 양식 |
| 전화: +44 203-395-7864, +852 2978-9202 | |
| 주소: 영국 런던 E14 5HJ 카나리 워프 카나리 워프 20 카나리 워프, 영국 | |
| 중국 홍콩 중심의 8 금융 거리, 두국제 금융 센터 | |
FX Connect은 2003년에 설립된 영국을 기반으로 하는 규제되지 않은 금융 회사입니다. 데모 계정을 통해 거래 유연성, 결제 솔루션, 거래 보고서 및 워크플로우 관리를 포함한 다양한 금융 서비스를 제공합니다. TradeNeXusSM 플랫폼을 지원합니다.

장단점
| 장점 | 단점 |
| 데모 계정 제공 | 규제 없음 |
| 다양한 서비스 제공 | |
| 다양한 고객 지원 채널 |
FX Connect 합법적인가요?

현재 FX Connect은 유효한 규제가 없습니다. 해당 도메인은 2003년 1월 22일에 등록되었으며 현재 상태는 “클라이언트 삭제 금지, 클라이언트 이전 금지, 클라이언트 업데이트 금지”입니다. 이 브로커를 선택한다면 귀하의 자금 안전에 높은 주의를 기울이시기 바랍니다.

FX Connect 서비스
FX Connect은 거래 유연성, 결제 솔루션, 거래 보고서 및 워크플로우 관리를 포함한 금융 서비스를 고객에게 제공합니다.

거래 플랫폼
| 거래 플랫폼 | 지원 | 사용 가능한 장치 |
| TradeNeXusSM | ✔ | 웹 |

키워드
- 5-10년
- 의문 있는 규제 라이선스
- 업무 구역 의심
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
Can you tell me the typical spread for EUR/USD when using a standard account on FX Connect?
Based on my careful review and personal experience in this industry, I could not locate any transparent or official data regarding the typical spread for EUR/USD with a standard account on FX Connect. For me, this immediately raises some caution: reputable brokers usually make this information freely available, as spread transparency is critical for managing trading costs and making informed decisions. What stands out to me is that FX Connect currently operates without any valid regulatory oversight. This lack of regulation means there is no trustworthy third party verifying their pricing or ensuring fair dealing. In my view, without proper regulation, any claims about tight spreads or competitive trading conditions lack meaningful external validation, which is a significant risk factor. Given these circumstances, I approached this question with particular caution. If an unregulated broker does not disclose their EUR/USD spread structure directly, I would personally consider this a red flag. As a trader, I insist on full clarity before ever risking funds. Without published spreads or regulatory safeguards, it is impossible for me to make an evidence-based recommendation regarding their costs or competitiveness. I would advise extreme caution and, if transparency around such core trading conditions cannot be obtained, consider alternative brokers with clear disclosure and robust regulatory status.
What are the key advantages and disadvantages of using FX Connect for trading?
Drawing from my own experience as a forex trader, evaluating FX Connect presents a number of clear considerations. One positive aspect is the availability of demo accounts, which for me has always been essential in assessing a broker's platform and services without risking real capital. The broad suite of services, including execution flexibility and workflow management, seems theoretically attractive, particularly for those who prioritize operational support in addition to pure trading execution. However, for me, the most significant and concerning drawback is that FX Connect currently operates without any valid financial regulation. As someone who values capital security above all, trading with an unregulated broker introduces unacceptable risks. From my perspective, this lack of oversight means there is no assurance that client funds are protected or that operational practices meet industry standards. The platform offered, TradeNeXusSM, is also fairly specialized and less widely known than industry staples like MT4 or MT5, so I would approach it with caution, especially since information about its functionality in a trading context appears limited. Overall, while customer support appears accessible and a demo account is available, I cannot comfortably recommend trading real funds with FX Connect due to the regulatory gap. For me, security and compliance are non-negotiable, especially in an industry as fraught with risk as forex trading.
How do the different account types available on FX Connect compare to each other?
From my experience analyzing FX Connect, I found their account type offerings rather unclear, which is concerning from a trader’s perspective. FX Connect emphasizes services such as execution flexibility, settlement solutions, and workflow management, and they do provide a demo account, which allowed me to test their platform without committing real funds. However, there is no transparent information about distinct live account types—such as Standard, ECN, or VIP—nor about specific trading conditions tied to them like spreads, commissions, or margin requirements. This lack of clear account differentiation makes it difficult for traders like me to compare options or tailor my trading approach. In regulated brokers, these differences are often critical, as account types define risk exposure, costs, and even platform access. The only consistent offering I could confirm was access to the TradeNeXusSM platform and the ability to use a demo account. On top of that, FX Connect is completely unregulated and carries high potential risk labels. This, combined with insufficient transparency around account types, leads me to be very cautious. Personally, as someone responsible for safeguarding my capital, the absence of both clear regulatory oversight and fully disclosed account structures means I would not feel confident using FX Connect for live trading. For risk-conscious traders, this is a notable drawback.
Have you encountered any drawbacks related to FX Connect's platform stability or their customer support services?
Given my experience as a forex trader, I place a high priority on platform stability and reliable customer support—both of which play significant roles in safeguarding my trading activities. When examining FX Connect, I proceed with considerable caution due to their status as an unregulated broker, as highlighted in their background. The lack of regulation alone raises critical concerns about the level of oversight and recourse available should something go wrong, so I approach any potential engagement with heightened scrutiny. Regarding platform stability, FX Connect utilizes TradeNeXusSM as its trading platform. While they promote execution flexibility and various reporting features, I cannot independently verify the robustness or uptime of their system based on publicly available, regulated benchmarks. In my mindset, the absence of regulatory audits introduces uncertainty; unregulated brokers may not be held to the same operational standards, making unexpected outages or unresolved technical issues a real risk. For a trader like myself, this uncertainty can directly impact my confidence in executing time-sensitive trades. On the customer support front, while FX Connect offers multiple contact channels, I remain reserved in my expectations. In unregulated settings, the quality and timeliness of support can vary greatly, and I’m mindful that escalation paths may be limited or ambiguous if disputes arise. Though there is a positive user review referencing helpful and knowledgeable staff, I don’t consider one testimonial sufficient to mitigate the fundamental risks I see due to lack of external oversight. Overall, while FX Connect offers an appealing range of services and a demo account for testing, the combination of unregulated status and unverified platform or support standards means I would exercise significant caution. My advice is always to thoroughly test any broker’s reliability before exposure to live funds, especially in the absence of regulatory protection.
댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....
