WikiFX

Rispondi

Based on my review and experience with various brokers, I must approach C&S with significant caution. From the available information, there is no publicly disclosed detail regarding inactivity fees or specific charges related to dormant accounts with C&S. The absence of this key information is concerning to me, especially when considering the broker already operates without any form of recognized financial regulation. As a trader, transparent fee structures are vital for good risk management, particularly with potential inactivity costs that can erode account balances silently over time. In my assessment of C&S, the lack of clear, published policies about these fees, added to their overall limited disclosure and absence of demo accounts, increases the potential risk for unexpected charges. Past experience has taught me that opaque brokers—those without clear regulatory oversight and full transparency—may introduce or change fees unexpectedly, and customer recourse is often limited. Given that there is no official indication about inactivity fees, I would proceed extremely cautiously. For me, it would be essential to obtain direct and documented confirmation from the broker before opening an account. Without sufficient regulatory oversight, even seemingly minor policies can become problematic, so I cannot recommend assuming C&S will not impose such a fee simply because it is not disclosed.