WikiFX

Reply

In my experience as a trader evaluating new brokers, I approach CMB with considerable caution, despite its long operating history and regulation in Hong Kong under the SFC. First, it’s important to highlight that CMB focuses on stocks, options, and futures, and does not offer forex or more diverse asset classes. For me, this limited instrument selection restricts my ability to spread risk through multi-asset strategies. While regulatory oversight is a positive sign, it does not guarantee a risk-free experience; regulatory action typically only occurs after issues have arisen. When I researched user feedback, I noticed troubling reports regarding withdrawals and communication. Several users described situations where they could not access their funds, sometimes for extended periods, with explanations ranging from staff illness to demands for additional payments or supposed taxes. This sort of account from peers is a red flag for me, especially when transparency and access to funds are vital for any active trader. Operationally, payment methods appear somewhat restrictive, relying heavily on bank transfers, and the account opening process may require in-person steps, depending on your location and residency status. In today's trading environment, I find this less convenient than the streamlined processes at many global competitors. Overall, although CMB’s regulatory status and transparent fee structure are positives, I remain cautious, given repeated withdrawal issues reported by users and the limited product range. For me, ensuring reliable fund access is essential before entrusting capital to any broker.