WikiFX

Reply

As an independent trader who values transparency and a clear understanding of broker costs, I always make it a priority to identify all potential fees before choosing where to trade. In the case of GFFM, I’ve carefully reviewed the available information provided by their official sources and regulatory status as detailed on industry platforms. Unfortunately, GFFM does not publish detailed information about their trading conditions, including the presence or absence of inactivity fees. This lack of disclosure is a concern for me because, in my experience, hidden or unexpected fees—especially inactivity charges—can significantly impact long-term profitability, particularly for those who do not trade actively. I noticed that GFFM focuses primarily on commodities trading and operates under FCA regulation, which theoretically promotes a baseline of transparency and fair dealing. However, the unavailability of key fee details, combined with other limitations such as a lack of demo accounts and little information on payment methods, makes it difficult for me to assess the full cost structure. In my opinion, this is a red flag for traders who prize predictability and want to avoid surprises, especially since inactivity fees are fairly common practice among brokers. Given the absence of concrete terms regarding inactivity fees, I would exercise extra caution. Before opening an account or depositing funds, I would personally reach out directly to GFFM’s support channels for explicit confirmation on account inactivity policies. For me, having all potential fees and requirements in clear writing is an absolute necessity before engaging with any broker.