11 Phone Numbers, 26 Deposits, RM1.7 Million Gone
A 45-year-old businessman has lost more than RM1.7 million in an alleged online investment scam.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:A 70 year old manager has lost RM1.36 million after falling victim to an online investment scam through a mobile app named ‘BIONM’.

A 70 year old account manager from a private company has lost RM1.36 million after falling victim to an online investment scam in Penangs Barat Daya district.
The report was lodged last Monday with the Commercial Crime Investigation Division at the Barat Daya district police headquarters. According to Penang police chief Datuk Hamzah Ahmad, the victim had been drawn into what appeared to be a legitimate stock trading opportunity promoted through WhatsApp in late December last year.
The advertisement promoted a stock trading scheme that claimed it could generate returns of between eight and 15 per cent on invested capital within two months. The promise of relatively high profits in a short period appears to have convinced the victim to proceed.
After expressing interest, the man was instructed to download a mobile application known as BIONM. He registered as a member and began transferring funds into accounts provided by the operators. Over a period of time, he carried out 14 separate money transfers to four different bank accounts. The total amount transferred reached RM1.365 million.
The structure of the scheme mirrored that of many fraudulent online trading operations. Victims are guided to use an application that displays fabricated profits and account balances, giving the impression of successful trades. As the displayed returns increase, so does the victims confidence in the platform.
In this case, the deception only became clear when the victim attempted to withdraw what the application showed as accumulated profits. He was informed that he needed to pay an additional RM1 million as a commission fee to the platform in order to release alleged earnings of RM11 million.
The demand for a substantial upfront payment to access profits raised alarm. It was at this stage that the victim realised he had likely been deceived. The promised profits existed only within the application interface and had no connection to actual trading activity.
Police have since launched an investigation under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating. Authorities are working to trace the network behind the fraud, including identifying the individuals linked to the bank accounts that received the funds. Efforts are ongoing to determine whether the case is connected to a broader syndicate operating across districts or states.
The incident adds to a growing list of cases involving fraudulent investment apps that circulate through messaging platforms and social media channels. WhatsApp in particular has become a common entry point for such schemes, as it allows direct and personalised communication with potential victims.
The tactics used in this case are consistent with patterns observed across Southeast Asia. Fraudsters often promote attractive but unrealistic returns, encourage the use of proprietary applications, and require multiple staged payments. Early transactions may appear to generate profits within the app, but withdrawals are blocked unless further payments are made. Once victims either refuse or are unable to transfer more funds, communication typically ceases.
For investors, the warning signs are clear. Promises of fixed or unusually high returns within a short timeframe should prompt immediate caution. Legitimate investment platforms do not require additional commission payments to release profits, nor do they guarantee specific returns in volatile markets.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

A 45-year-old businessman has lost more than RM1.7 million in an alleged online investment scam.

A Malaysian activist has alleged the emergence of a new scam compound near Myawaddy, Myanmar, dubbed “KK Park 2.0,” highlighting how fraud syndicates may be adapting to regional crackdowns by shifting operations to remote, heavily secured locations.

Did you find a contrasting difference between Diago Finance’s deposit and withdrawal processes? Were deposits seamless, but withdrawals remained difficult? Did you fail to receive your funds despite paying extra fees? Did the Saint Lucia-based forex broker scam your hard-earned capital? You are not alone! Many traders have expressed concerns over the alleged illegitimate trading activities carried out by the broker. In this Diago Finance review article, we have investigated some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

Thinking about investing in FirewoodFX? Attracted by its no-deposit bonus offers? Stop for a while and evaluate many of the complaints concerning FirewoodFX bonus, verification, withdrawal denials, fund scams, etc. These alleged issues have grabbed significant traction on broker review platforms. In this FirewoodFX review article, we have investigated all of these allegations, shared bonus promotions claimed by the forex broker, and explained its regulatory status. Keep reading!