简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract：The regulator uses case studies of Porshe's IPO and Care A2's Pre-IPO. ASIC reminds that investing at the Pre-IPO stage involves higher risks.
The Australian Securities and Exchange Commission (ASIC) issued a warning on Wednesday regarding the increased number of fake initial public offering (IPO) investment scams targeting consumers and individual investors.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
According to the local market financial watchdog, scammers are impersonating licensed Australian firms and promoting fake offerings. Recently, investors were offered the opportunity to invest in Porsche's IPO, which took place on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and Care A2's pre-IPO on the Australian trading floor. The fake offers overlapped with the actual listings and led to a loss of funds. ASIC honestly admits that after transferring money to scammers, it is no longer able to help consumers.
“A company that promotes an IPO in Australia must lodge a prospectus with ASIC. It may be a scam if: the company has not lodged a prospectus with ASIC (you can check this for free through ASIC Connect), the bank accounts details do not directly match the entity you are investing with and the document contains email addresses which don't correspond with relevant corporate email addresses,” ASIC commented in the press release.
ASIC warns that investing at the Pre-IPO stage may involve higher risks for retail traders. Offerings targeting the general public, especially distributed by emails, tend to be illegal and fraudulent. Therefore, the regulator recommends taking extreme caution when investing.
The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) and ASIC announced the start of Scams Awareness Week 2022 on Monday. The regulator publishes information on recognizing and avoiding particular investment frauds throughout the whole week. Firstly, it warned against cryptocurrency scammers and has now turned its attention to fake IPOs.
The Australian financial market watchdog continues its efforts to protect retail investors better. Last week, it heralded a list of 12 'Enforcement Priorities' for next year, including greenwashing, social media misinformation and cryptocurrencies. In August, the market governor asked brokers to 'reconsider' offering high-risk trading products to protect consumers.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.
Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.
When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact
WikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFX
