天眼評分
PAXOS
https://www.paxos.com/
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
B
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
暫未查證到有效監管資訊,請注意風險!
- 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效外匯監管,請注意風險!
瀏覽PAXOS 的用戶還瀏覽了..
EC Markets
搜索來源
投放語言
市場分析
素材投放
官網鑒定
paxos.com
165.227.73.110伺服器所在地美國
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區台灣
功能變數名稱創建時間2002-09-07網站名稱WHOIS.REGISTRAR.AMAZON.COM所屬公司AMAZON REGISTRAR, INC.
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| PAXOS 評論摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 2002 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 美國 |
| 監管 | 無監管 |
| 服務 | 加密貨幣經紀、錢包和交易基礎設施、穩定幣支付、全球支付和支付、穩定幣發行 |
| 交易平台 | 網頁 |
| 客戶支援 | 在線聊天 |
| 電話:(855) 880 5275 | |
PAXOS 資訊
PAXOS 成立於2002年,總部設於美國。儘管在數字資產和區塊鏈基礎設施市場佔有一席之地,但並未受到主要金融監管機構如FCA、ASIC或CySEC的監管。通過其API優先平台,該公司為機構提供加密貨幣經紀、錢包和交易基礎設施、穩定幣發行以及跨境支付解決方案。

優缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 提供多元化服務 | 無監管 |
| 支援跨境支付和支付 | 有關費用的資訊有限 |
| 基於API的平台適合開發人員和企業 |
PAXOS 是否合法?
PAXOS 在美國註冊,但並未受到任何重要的美國金融監管機構的監管。此外,它也沒有來自全球知名監管機構如FCA(英國)、ASIC(澳大利亞)或CySEC(塞浦路斯)的許可證。請注意風險!

根據WHOIS域名查詢,域名paxos.com於2002年9月7日首次註冊,目前仍在運作中。它將於2025年9月7日到期,最後更新日期為2024年8月3日。該域名受到“客戶刪除禁止”、“客戶轉移禁止”和“客戶更新禁止”等限制。

服務
PAXOS 為數字資產提供受監管的金融基礎設施,包括加密貨幣經紀、錢包和交易技術、穩定幣發行以及跨境支付。

交易平台
| 交易平台 | 支援 | 可用設備 |
| Paxos Web | ✔ | 網頁 |
| 手機應用程式 | ✘ | – |
| 桌面軟件 | ✘ | – |
存款和提款
Paxos並未公開其穩定幣支付平台的任何存款或提款費用。使用其基於API的基礕設施的企業,在發送或接收穩定幣交易時可能會產生網絡(gas)費用,費用根據使用的區塊鏈而有所不同。
| 方法 | 費用(來自Paxos) | 處理時間 |
| 穩定幣存款 | 僅網絡(gas)費用 | 幾乎即時(在鏈上) |
| 穩定幣提款 | 僅網絡(gas)費用 | 幾乎即時(在鏈上) |
| 法幣轉換(美元) | 未提及 | 根據銀行/支付通道而異 |

企業畫像
- 5-10年
- 監管牌照存疑
- 區域性交易商
- 高級風險隱患
資訊

曝光 PAXOS──誆稱租用礦機獲利無風險,指控帳戶異常逼繳保證金
近年來線上投資風氣興盛,愈來愈多民眾透過網路接觸各式各樣的投資平台,結果卻不慎落入詐騙集團的陷阱。日前外匯天眼就收到一位受害者針對PAXOS這家交易商的爆料,下面讓我們一起了解事情的詳細經過。

曝光 PAXOS遭爆為假投資詐騙黑平台,網站極具安全疑慮
外匯天眼成立至今已收錄並更新超過53000家經紀商資訊,不僅是全球最權威的交易商查詢平台,更致力宣導如何識別美股、期貨、外匯詐騙券商,協助提供投資人的防詐意識,遠離各種投資陷阱。最近,我們注意到一家名為PAXOS的低分券商與投資人傳出交易糾紛,以下是相關的查詢與解析。
Wiki問答
How much is the least amount you need to deposit to start a live trading account with PAXOS?
As a trader with years of experience, one of the first things I look for in any broker is transparent information about account minimums and deposit procedures. When evaluating PAXOS, I found that there is a significant lack of clarity regarding the minimum deposit required to open a live trading account. The available information does not specify a minimum deposit amount for individual traders, which for me raises some immediate flags about openness and reliability. This is especially concerning given that established, reputable brokers typically state such basics clearly. Even more troubling are the broader risks associated with PAXOS: the company is not regulated by any major financial authority, and there are multiple public reports of users experiencing withdrawal issues, frozen funds, and poor customer service. For me, these points are not minor inconveniences—they are critical warnings in the forex and crypto landscape, where client protections are paramount. The absence of clear deposit minimums, combined with unaddressed regulatory concerns and serious user complaints, makes me personally very cautious. If I don’t know the minimum required to fund an account, I strongly question the safety of making any deposit at all. In my opinion, proceeding with a broker lacking such basic transparency is extremely risky.
Have you experienced any drawbacks with PAXOS's customer support or noticed any issues with the stability of their platform?
Drawing from my experience as a trader, I approach every broker with a critical eye, prioritizing regulatory security and the quality of support above all. With PAXOS, several issues immediately stood out. First, the total lack of regulation by any major financial authority set off significant alarm bells for me. This regulatory void not only raises concerns around operational transparency but leaves users with little recourse should disputes arise—a risk I simply cannot overlook. Regarding customer support, my interactions left much to be desired. There have been reports, which I fully corroborate, of delayed or unresponsive customer service. This is particularly worrisome when dealing with any platform handling financial assets or large sums. Communication is fundamental for building trust, especially when login issues or withdrawal requests arise, and I noticed definite shortcomings here. Stability of the platform is equally crucial. Reports about account access problems—such as being unable to log in or access funds—underline a worrying lack of reliability. For me, even isolated incidents involving frozen funds or site inaccessibility are unacceptable, as quick, consistent access to my assets is non-negotiable. In summary, my direct experience, combined with recurring user reports, reinforces a conservative stance. I have found the customer support lacking and the platform’s operational reliability questionable, making it unsuitable for my trading needs.
Can you tell me the typical spread for EUR/USD when trading on a standard account with PAXOS?
As an experienced forex trader, I rely heavily on transparency around trading conditions—especially when it comes to spreads for major pairs like EUR/USD. In my thorough research and careful review of PAXOS, I found no reliable or specific information publicly provided regarding typical spreads for EUR/USD or any other forex pair on their standard account. This lack of clarity raises an immediate concern for me, as transparent fee structures are essential in evaluating potential trading costs and managing risk. When a broker does not disclose such fundamental details, I find it difficult to accurately assess their competitiveness or even basic suitability for forex trading. Additionally, PAXOS operates without regulation from recognized financial authorities, which compounds my caution. I noticed multiple user complaints about withdrawal issues and problematic experiences with the platform, and these, combined with the absence of spread information, make it impossible for me to share any precise figures. For me, this level of opaqueness is a significant red flag: before committing any funds or considering live trading, I require brokers to publish clear data on spreads and all other trading costs. In the case of PAXOS, I have not been able to verify the EUR/USD spread, and that alone would make me pause before proceeding further.
What major risks or downsides should I watch out for when using PAXOS?
From my perspective as an experienced forex trader, there are several serious risks and issues with PAXOS that I simply cannot overlook. The most critical red flag for me is the complete absence of regulation by respected financial authorities such as the FCA, ASIC, or CySEC. In the world of trading, I’ve learned that oversight by credible regulators is fundamental to ensuring fair practices and customer protection. Without such regulation, users have almost no recourse if things go wrong. Looking deeper, there are recurring patterns in user reports that worry me. Multiple users have complained about being unable to withdraw their funds, with some even detailing that they were asked to pay significant additional deposits just to access their own money. Experiences like having accounts frozen, being locked out of the platform, or being pressured to deposit more funds suggest operational practices I would not trust with my assets or data. Additionally, even as PAXOS presents itself as a provider of digital asset and payment infrastructure, ambiguity surrounds its fee structure and business scope. Lack of transparency on these basics increases uncertainty and, in my view, exposes users to unforeseen costs or changes in conditions. Overall, based on these factors, I am extremely cautious toward PAXOS and do not find it a trustworthy venue for trading or asset management. For me, these risks outweigh any potential benefits.
用戶評價 7
你要評價的內容
請輸入...














pra
泰國
詐騙,無法提款💀
爆料
M4613
台灣
詐盜用圖片,假投資投資 要出金還要繳保證金50%
爆料
robby2244
美國
不能再登錄網站了。
爆料
东风破
印尼
PAXOS官網自相矛盾、不專業,說明這個經紀商很不靠譜。最讓我惱火的是,他們瘋狂地打電話給我要存款!
中評
robby2244
美國
客戶服務從未回復過,我無法使用我的資金,現在我無法登錄我的帳戶,但我知道我的登錄名和密碼是正確的。
爆料
robby2244
美國
1100 被凍結,不能出金,讓我投資的人告訴我這是一個騙局,我對此無能為力,甚至我都沒法去監管機構。
爆料
robby2244
美國
我試圖取出我的資金,但從來沒有成功過,我對此無能為力。
爆料