WikiFX

Rispondi

After closely reviewing CAPITAL as a potential trading venue for myself, I must clarify that information on specific account types is notably absent. Unlike many contemporaries, CAPITAL does not publish details on retail versus institutional accounts, minimum deposits, margin requirements, or fee distinctions. As an experienced trader, this lack of transparency immediately raises several questions and concerns. My own due diligence relies heavily on knowing precisely which account structure I’d be committing to—especially since each account type can have different rights, restrictions, or cost implications. What I do note is that CAPITAL is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong and focuses primarily on securities, futures, options, and funds, not forex or CFDs. Their service seems more aligned with traditional brokerage activities, possibly catering to local and institutional clients, but without published documentation on account categories, I cannot distinguish whether retail or professional traders receive different terms. In practice, the absence of clear account distinctions makes it harder for me to adequately assess whether their offering fits my trading style or risk tolerance. In my experience, when a broker does not outline its account options and conditions, caution is warranted. I would need to speak directly with their support to clarify these matters before considering any commitment. For me, clear and upfront information about account types is essential to building trust and planning safe engagement in financial markets.