WikiFX

Reply

Drawing from my years of experience trading with various brokers, I always make regulatory status and transparency a top priority before considering any advantages. With Star Store, I noticed there is no valid regulatory oversight and WikiFX actually highlights several red flags, including a “suspicious regulatory license” and a “high potential risk” warning. This significantly outweighs any potential features, including the trading instruments or fee structure they might offer. Because Star Store operates without clear or trustworthy regulation, I find it very difficult to verify the legitimacy or competitiveness of their trading instrument selection or fee transparency. Reliable brokers usually display their trading fees, spreads, and available assets clearly and are subject to independent oversight—this is crucial for both fairness and security in trading. The fact that Star Store scores a 0.00 on the Regulatory Index only reinforces my caution. For me, unless a broker can demonstrate genuine regulatory compliance and trustworthy business practices, any possible advantage—be it in instruments or fees—is overshadowed by the larger risk to client funds. I strongly advise a conservative approach: transparency, security, and regulation always come first. Based on what I’ve seen, these essentials are lacking at Star Store.