WikiFX

Reply

From my experience as an independent trader, T&D stands out primarily for its strong regulatory credentials and lengthy track record in Japan. It’s authorized by the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) with a registered Retail Forex License, which, for me, is one of the most reassuring regulatory frameworks in Asia. This foundation, plus the fact that T&D has been operational for over 15 years and was founded as far back as 1980, suggests a level of operational maturity and oversight I find essential when trusting a broker with my funds. However, there are notable limitations that affect my assessment. The broker’s investment management services seem to focus mainly on tailored strategies—AXIA (Value), SOPHIA (Core-Growth), and ESG Strategy—rather than offering the typical retail forex trading environment I might expect. This scope makes me cautious, especially since WikiFX flags a “suspicious scope of business” and rates the risk level as “medium potential risk.” I believe the lack of clarity about their core forex offerings and the single-channel support (email only) could present real challenges for retail traders seeking responsive assistance or transparency about withdrawals and trade execution. Given the single negative user review about withdrawal problems, I would be prudent and avoid making significant deposits until I’ve vetted their processes further with smaller amounts. For me, regulatory strength is important, but comprehensive, responsive customer support and transparent terms are just as critical to a safe trading experience.