Abstract：A power struggle over the future of the Federal Reserve is intensifying as Treasury Secretary nominee Scott Bessent spearheads a process to select the next Fed Chair, aiming to align the central bank more closely with the White House's economic agenda.
A power struggle over the future of the Federal Reserve is intensifying as Treasury Secretary nominee Scott Bessent spearheads a process to select the next Fed Chair, aiming to align the central bank more closely with the White House's economic agenda.
The 'Shadow' Mandate
Reports indicate that President-elect Donald Trump has issued a stark ultimatum to Bessent regarding interest rates: “Fix it, or you're fired.” In response, Bessent is orchestrating a screening process for the next Fed Chair intended to identify candidates sympathetic to rate cuts and coordinated policy.
The shortlist has narrowed to the “Two Kevins”:
- Kevin Hassett: Current NEC Director and former economic adviser, viewed as a loyalist.
- Kevin Warsh: Former Fed Governor with a background in finance, considered more independent but open to reform.
Bessents strategy involves reviving a pre-1951 dynamic where the Treasury held significant sway over the Fed, particularly regarding balance sheet operations (QE/QT). Proponents argue this coordination is necessary for managing the $30 trillion Treasury market, while critics warn it strikes at the heart of institutional independence.
Institutional Pushback
Sensing the encroaching political pressure, the Federal Reserve has reportedly moved to “fortify” its independence. In a rare maneuver, regional Fed presidents have been reappointed ahead of schedule, a move Wall Street analysts interpret as an effort to secure the central bank's leadership structure against executive overreach.
Market participants are closely watching these developments. A politicized Fed could fundamentally alter the USDs risk profile, particularly if monetary policy is perceived as subservient to fiscal goals or election cycles.
