RaiseFX Review: Is It Legit or Scam Broker?
RaiseFX Review reveals low WikiFX score, hidden withdrawal fees, and serious doubts about its trustworthiness.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:OANDA Japan terminates dormant accounts with no balance after two years, requiring re-registration. Learn about the policy and OANDA’s recent expansions.

OANDA Japan, a subsidiary of the global brokerage OANDA Corporation, has permanently deleted accounts inactive for over two years with zero balance, the company announced on Monday. This action, aligned with its terms for trading over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, aims to maintain operational efficiency and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. The policy, though long-standing, may catch some traders off guard if they leave accounts idle without formally closing them.
On May 20, the company sent emails to affected users, informing them that their unused accounts were closed and cannot be brought back. The online trading platform made it clear that this decision is final, and deleted accounts are gone for good.
Traders who want to start trading with OANDA Japan again after their account is deleted will need to sign up from scratch. This includes submitting new identity documents to meet regulatory standards. The company stressed that these steps are crucial to comply with local financial laws.

This practice of clearing out inactive accounts isnt unique to OANDA Japan. Many brokerage firms regularly remove unused accounts, especially those with no money or recent activity. This helps keep operations smooth, protects user information, and cuts down on extra costs.
Some traders who left their accounts without officially closing them might be surprised by this move, even though it‘s been part of OANDA Japan’s rules for a while. The company urges users to stay updated and manage their accounts actively to avoid unexpected issues.
These changes come after OANDA Global Corporation, OANDA Japan‘s parent company, was bought by FTMO Group in February this year. The acquisition has led to new services, like the launch of OANDA Labs Trader, which signals the company’s move into proprietary trading.
OANDA has also expanded its offerings by adding Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) to its European investment options. These steps show OANDAs focus on growing its services while keeping its strong commitment to following regulations and supporting customers.
In conclusion, OANDA Japan‘s removal of inactive accounts highlights the need to keep trading accounts active and compliant. For users whose accounts were deleted, the only option is to re-register fully. This move matches industry norms and helps ensure trading platforms remain secure and efficient in today’s fast-changing financial world.
You can check out more of Oanda's latest news here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/0001134561.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

RaiseFX Review reveals low WikiFX score, hidden withdrawal fees, and serious doubts about its trustworthiness.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.

When choosing a broker, the most important question is always: "Are my funds safe?" The answer depends on the broker's regulatory framework. For a company like AMarkets, which has been operating since 2007, understanding its licensing isn't just about checking a box. It's about understanding what that regulation truly means for your protection as a trader. This article provides a clear, detailed breakdown of AMarkets' licenses, what their offshore status really means, the extra safety measures it uses, and the risks you need to consider. We will go beyond marketing claims to give you factual, balanced information about their official licenses and other trust signals, helping you make a smart decision.

The question "Is AMarkets safe?" is the most important thing any trader can ask before investing. Putting your capital in a trading company requires a lot of trust, and the answer isn't simply yes or no. It's complicated and depends on understanding how the company works, what protections they have, and their past performance. To give you a clear answer, we've done a complete safety review of AMarkets. Our research looks at three main areas, each examining a different part of the company's safety. We'll share what we found using facts you can check, so you can make your own smart decision about whether your capital will be safe.