简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
IC Markets Challenges CySEC’s €200,000 Fine
Abstract:IC Markets (EU) Ltd has announced plans to appeal a €200,000 fine imposed by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC).

IC Markets (EU) Ltd has announced plans to appeal a €200,000 fine imposed by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). The fine pertains to allegations that the broker breached EU financial regulations concerning the marketing, distribution, and sale of Contracts for Differences (CFDs) to retail clients.
In a robust response, IC Markets argued that CySEC overlooked “irrefutable audited evidence” and relied on information provided by a former employee dismissed for misconduct. IC Markets claimed this ex-employee threatened the company with regulatory repercussions, alleging connections within CySEC. The broker asserts that CySEC's decision is based on assumptions and speculation, rather than solid evidence, challenging the fairness and integrity of the regulatory process.
According to IC Markets, CySEC's reliance on biased testimony while ignoring undeniable evidence suggests a pattern of selective and disproportionate application of regulatory authority, which they believe endangers transparency, market integrity, and fair competition.
The fine from CySEC relates to IC Markets' alleged failure to comply with article 42 of Regulation (EU) No. 600/2014, which governs markets in financial instruments. The broker is accused of engaging in activities that circumvented the requirements of paragraph 4(1)(a) of Directive DI87-09, which restricts the marketing, distribution, and sale of CFDs to retail clients, especially concerning initial margin protection.

The main allegation is that IC Markets offered a leverage ratio of up to 1:1000 through an offshore entity within the same group, bypassing the legal limit of 1:30. CySEC noted that IC Markets had committed a similar infraction in 2021 and had not implemented the promised corrective measures.
CySEC stated that the company engaged in actions aimed at circumventing the restrictive measures enacted to protect investors. The regulator decided to impose the fine during a meeting held on July 1, 2024, reflecting ongoing concerns about the broker's adherence to EU financial regulations.
IC Markets vehemently disputes CySEC's findings and has committed to appealing the fine. The broker contends that the regulatory decision is erroneous and pledges to pursue all available channels to overturn the penalty.
As this issue develops, it underscores significant concerns about the regulatory framework for financial instruments in the EU and the mechanisms designed to uphold market integrity and protect investors. The outcome of IC Markets' appeal will be closely monitored by industry participants and could have far-reaching consequences for the enforcement of financial regulations within the region.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Firsttrade Review: Traders Raise Ponzi-Style Scam Concerns, Withdrawal Denials & More Issues
Have you lost all your capital while trading via Firsttrade? Does the US-based forex broker disallow you from withdrawing funds? Do you have to pay massive fees when transferring funds? Does your trade get affected because of frequent malfunction in the trading app? These have been haunting many traders at Firsttrade. Consequently, many of them have raised complaints online. In this Firsttrade review, we have shared such complaints. Keep reading to know about them.

Defcofx Review: Spread Manipulation & Poor Customer Support Outrage Traders
Does the poor customer support service leave you stunned when trading via Defcofx? Do you receive blunt, negative responses from the support team on several trading queries? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker pile on the losses for you by manipulating forex spread charges? In this Defcofx review, we have shared some complaints made against the broker. This will further answer your question: Is Defcofx real or fake?

Beware the “Ghost Brokers” This Halloween — Trade Safely with WikiFX
Stay safe this Halloween! Spot and avoid ghost brokers in the forex world with WikiFX – your trusted tool for verifying broker legitimacy.

FP Markets Social Trading Expands Global Access
FP Markets Social Trading connects traders worldwide, offering copy trading, Forex strategies, and expert insights across global markets.
