GmtFX Flagged for Operating Without Authorisation as Regulatory and Risk Signals Mount
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:If you are a smart forex investor, you must not want to trade with M24 Markets.

This unlicensed broker has been exposed by WikiFX earlier, and recently, it has caught the attention of fore regulator. Therefore, more and more investors see its true face now. Here we are going to show you the proof that M24 Markets is a scam.
An Anonymous Company
M24 Markets does not present all the information that it shall show to investors, such as legal documents, regulations, and other details of the company. It does not even say the company name, which makes the broker an anonymous company. Here is a red flag.
Please be aware of this kind of anonymous company since a regulated broker has no reason to hide its company name or regulation. In most situations, anonymous companies are often illegal brokers.

UK FCA Warning
According to the telephone number and the address on its “Contact Us”, we found that M24 Markets is a broker located in the UK. So we searched the UK forex regulator - the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA). And found a warning against the scam.
UK FCA confirmed that the fraudster is providing financial services in the UK without authorization.


Risky Leverage
Like the other frauds, this scammer offers attractive trading conditions to lure investors.
The highest leverage it shows on the webpage reaches 1:500, which confirms that it is an unregulated broker in the UK from another aspect. Since the UK FCA has strict leverage limits for the brokers it regulates, less than 1:30.

High leverage does not always a good thing for investors because higher leverage brings higher risks. Investors therefore should choose the trading conditions that fit them.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.

A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.

Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.

When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact