简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Investors and Global Brokerage Known As FXCM Inc. Need More Time To Discuss Class Action Settlement
Abstract:Global Brokerage Inc, previously known as FXCM Inc, and the plaintiffs in a securities class action claim that additional time is needed to negotiate a settlement. This is evident from a letter filed by Global Brokerage on January 26, 2023, with the New York Southern District Court.

Global Brokerage Inc, previously known as FXCM Inc, and the plaintiffs in a securities class action claim that additional time is needed to negotiate a settlement. This is evident from a letter filed by Global Brokerage on January 26, 2023, with the New York Southern District Court.
The parties in this dispute seek an extension of one week, until February 3, 2023, for submitting the Stipulation of Settlement and a petition for preliminary approval of the settlement. This is the second request for a time extension. The initial request was granted by the Court, and the current deadline is January 27, 2023. Although significant progress has been achieved, and the parties are on the verge of addressing the main concerns affecting the settlement, more time is required to finish the settlement papers.
Because of the parties' agreement in principle to settle this matter, the securities class action against Global Brokerage, Inc., previously known as FXCM, Inc., Dror Niv, and William Ahdout has been staying since December 23, 2022.
Let us remember that the plaintiffs, in this case, include (among others): 683 Capital Partners, LP the lead plaintiff, while Shipco Transport Inc. and E-Global Trade and Finance Group, Inc. are class representatives.
Plaintiffs sue FXCM, Dror Niv, and William Ahdout under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 established thereunder. Shipco and E-Global file claims on behalf of themselves and a certified Class that includes “all persons and/or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Global Brokerage, Inc., f/k/a FXCM Inc. (”FXCM“) Class A common stock between March 15, 2012, and February 6, 2017, both dates inclusive.” 683 Capital brings its claims one at a time.
The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants engaged in securities fraud by misrepresenting and omitting significant information concerning FXCM's covert connection with Effex Capital, LLC. FXCM provided foreign currency trading to retail consumers, advertising their “No Dealing Desk” or “agency model,” in which FXCM linked the user with a liquidity provider delivering the best price, with FXCM simply adding a mark-up to the price as a fee.
According to the plaintiffs, FXCM was surreptitiously collecting kickbacks of around 70% of trading profits from Effex, one of FXCM's key liquidity suppliers who was trading against FXCM's clients, unknown to FXCM's customers and investors.
Effex was headed by John Dittami, whom Defendants Niv and Ahdout employed at FXCM to establish an internal trading system, EES, that would compete with external market makers, according to the plaintiffs' complaint. The deal Dittami signed with FXCM called for a 70-30 split of EES's trading proceeds (70% to FXCM). Defendants chose to spin out EES as Effex since FXCM's compliance staff determined that FXCM could not honestly claim to be running an agency model if EES was trading against FXCM's clients. FXCM and Effex, on the other hand, preserved the 70-30 split of trading profits—Effex replacing Dittami and FXCM preserving its 70% share—which they disguised as “compensation for order flow.” For years, FXCM gave essential assistance to Effex, and Effex depended on FXCM to remain afloat.
Effex became one of FXCM's largest liquidity suppliers, and Defendants offered unique trading benefits in order to push more of FXCM's trading activity to Effex.
The National Futures Association (NFA) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) started looking into FXCM's association with Effex in 2013 and 2014. The NFA and CFTC announced regulatory settlements with the defendants on February 6, 2017, after the conclusion of trade, confirming the previously unknown link between FXCM and Effex and imposing heavy fines. The following day, the price of FXCM shares plummeted, causing the Plaintiffs and the Class to suffer.
Keep an eye out for more Forex Broker news.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to keep up to speed on current events.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

KVB Global Exposed: High Slippage, Hidden Transaction Fees & Fund Scams
Does the MT4 platform provided by KVB Global minimize your actual profit? Does the broker deny your withdrawal request and instead tell you to deposit more? Have you faced hidden charges on blockchain transactions by the KVB Group? Have you witnessed massive fund scams while trading with the KVB broker? You need to act fast and even take legal assistance to recover your stuck funds. Several traders have alleged that KVB Global is involved in illegitimate trading activities. Check out their complaints in this KVB Global review.

Pocket Broker Review: Traders Furious Over Withdrawal Denials, Account Blocks & Price Manipulation
Does Pocket Broker ask you to verify the payment method repeatedly as you request fund withdrawals? Does the South Africa-based forex broker disallow you the same despite multiple verifications? Does your Pocket Broker forex trading account get blocked without any reason? Do the prices shown on the Pocket Broker login vary from real market prices? These are forex investment scams that Pocket Broker has been allegedly involved in. Read on to find more details.

Is MH Markets Safe or a Scam? Regulation and Fund Security Explained
Is MH Markets a real broker or a potential scam? This is the most important question for any trader thinking about using this platform. Let's give you a straight answer right away. MH Markets is a working broker, not a complete fake scam. Read on to learn more about this crucial due diligence you need to do as a trader.

Your Complete MultiBank Group Crypto Trading Guide (2025)
Many traders ask us: can you trade crypto with MultiBank Group? The answer is yes. You can access the exciting cryptocurrency market through a special tool called a Contract for Difference, or CFD. This guide will teach you everything you need to know about MultiBank Group crypto trading. We will show you the basics of their crypto CFDs and how to make your first trade. Our goal is to give you the knowledge and confidence to explore these markets safely and effectively. We'll explain the platform's features, available coins, and the important risk management strategies you need to succeed.
