GmtFX Flagged for Operating Without Authorisation as Regulatory and Risk Signals Mount
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Importantly, FTX US has also filed for Chapter 11 protection.

Crypto markets are under pressure as FTX filed for bankruptcy protection.
The filing includes FTX.com, FTX US, and Alameda Research.
FTT, the native token of the FTX exchange, settled near the $2.20 level.
Crypto markets moved lower after FTX announced that it would file for bankruptcy protection. The Chapter 11 filing includes FTX.com, FTX US, and Alameda Research.
Sam Bankman-Fried resigned as CEO and will remain to assist an orderly transition. He will be replaced by John J. Ray III. Mr. Ray noted: “The immediate relief of Chapter 11 is appropriate to provide the FTX Group the opportunity to assess its situation and develop a process to maximize reсoveries for stakeholders.”
It should be noted that Sam Bankman-Fried has previously said that FTX US was 100% liquid. However, the company is included in the Chapter 11 filing, which means that it was also impacted by the recent events.
Not surprisingly, FTX bankruptcy had a negative impact on crypto markets. Bitcoin managed to settle below the $17000 level. Ethereum moved below $1250, while XRP declined towards $0.37. Solana, which has been under serious pressure due to its relationship with FTX, is currently trading near the $16.00 level. FTT, the native token of the FTX exchange, has settled near the $2.20 level.
Traders fear that FTX problems will lead to financial contagion. These worries have already materialized as crypto lender BlockFi paused withdrawals from the platform. BlockFi noted: “Given the lack of clarity on the status of FTX.com, FTX US and Alameda, we are not able to operate business as usual.” This statement was made before FTX filed for bankruptcy.
Obviously, market participants are worried that other firms, which have been connected to FTX and Alameda, may face problems, leading to forced liquidations of their crypto assets.
In the longer-term, stricter regulation is the key risk for the crypto industry. As FTX filed for Chapter 11 protection, the details of the FTX crash will soon be known. While stricter regulation may ultimately lead to wider crypto adoption, it will certainly put pressure on many existing crypto projects.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.

A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.

Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.

When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact