Shaw and Partners

Arnold Joseph

1-2 года

Are there any inactivity fees charged by Shaw and Partners, and under what circumstances might these apply?

WikiFX Ответить

Based on my review of Shaw and Partners as an experienced trader, I have not found any direct or clear mention of inactivity fees in the available information on this broker. Shaw and Partners positions itself primarily as a provider of wealth management, financial planning, and advisory services, rather than operating as a typical retail forex broker. Their account structures, such as Separately Managed Accounts and Model Portfolio Accounts, are tailored for investment goals rather than high-frequency trading. Because of this investment-focused model, the issue of inactivity fees—which are common among retail forex brokers—may not be as relevant or may be handled differently here. However, what makes me cautious is the general lack of detailed disclosures about fee structures. This, coupled with their "Exceeded" regulatory status, increases the need for extra diligence. As a trader who values transparency and clarity, I always advise directly contacting the broker’s customer support for up-to-date, written confirmation about any inactivity fee policy before opening or maintaining an account. It’s essential to fully understand not only trading costs but also any potential charges that could accrue through periods of account inactivity, especially with firms whose fee schedules may differ from standard retail brokerage norms. When regulatory clarity is not ideal, I believe asking direct, documented questions is the safest approach.

Broker Issues

Shaw and Partners

Fees and Spreads

08-11

Соединенные Штаты Америки

Franko Knavs

1-2 года

What is the lowest withdrawal amount allowed at once from my Shaw and Partners account?

WikiFX Ответить

Based on my in-depth review and personal experience with Shaw and Partners, I was unable to find any clear, published information about their minimum withdrawal amount for client accounts. This is an important point for me as a trader, because the transparency and accessibility of withdrawal policies directly affect my trust in a broker. In my experience, reputable and well-regulated brokers typically provide detailed information about such parameters either on their official website, client portal, or during the account opening process. However, while Shaw and Partners does hold an Australian Investment Advisory License, it’s crucial to note their regulatory status is currently marked as "Exceeded," which means their license has lapsed or is otherwise not fully in force. This raises some concerns about the ongoing oversight and clarity of their client-facing policies, including withdrawals. When a broker’s regulatory situation is ambiguous, I personally err on the side of caution and recommend confirming all withdrawal conditions directly with their customer support team before making a deposit or executing trades. My approach is always to avoid assumptions and seek specific, written confirmation to ensure funds' safety—especially when regulatory warnings or gaps are present. For me, knowing the fine details about withdrawals isn’t just a matter of convenience, but one of risk management.

Broker Issues

Shaw and Partners

Deposit

Withdrawal

08-10

Соединенные Штаты Америки

DoreenVanDenHeever

1-2 года

Based on your own experience, what do you consider to be the three main benefits of working with Shaw and Partners?

WikiFX Ответить

Based on my personal experience as a trader, Shaw and Partners offers a few noteworthy benefits, but it’s important to approach them with caution. First, I’ve found that their range of financial services—spanning wealth management, investment research, and tailored portfolio solutions—provides genuine flexibility for traders and investors looking to diversify or seek professional input. The ability to access separately managed accounts and goal-based portfolios has helped me align my investments closely with my risk profile and long-term goals, which is a strong point for anyone serious about managing their assets carefully. Second, Shaw and Partners seem to place a clear emphasis on bespoke service and client relationships. When I interacted with their team, I noticed that their advisers took the time to understand my personal situation before recommending strategies, which is something I value highly in this industry. This focus on integrity and building lasting relationships adds a layer of reassurance, particularly when the market can sometimes feel impersonal. Lastly, the fact that Shaw and Partners is based in Australia and was formerly regulated by ASIC initially gave me some confidence in their operational standards compared to some offshore entities. However, I must stress that their current “Exceeded” license status is a significant concern and has influenced my decision to use them only for specific, limited strategies rather than as a core brokerage. In summary, their broad service offering, personalized advice, and established track record are beneficial, but these must be weighed against current regulatory uncertainties.

Broker Issues

Shaw and Partners

Regulation

06-15

Соединенные Штаты Америки

Sanjay sirohi

1-2 года

Can I trust Shaw and Partners as a reliable and secure broker for trading?

WikiFX Ответить

As an experienced forex trader, I approach evaluating brokers like Shaw and Partners with a critical eye, especially regarding reliability and security. Shaw and Partners has been operating in Australia since 1995, offering a suite of services ranging from wealth management to institutional dealing. Their long-standing presence might initially imply stability, and as of my research, the company did hold an Investment Advisory License from ASIC, Australia’s primary financial regulator. However, it’s imperative to note that the status of their ASIC license is listed as “Exceeded”—meaning it has expired or is otherwise no longer valid. For me, this immediately raises a significant concern. Regulatory oversight is vital for client protection; if a firm is no longer actively regulated, the safeguards that normally protect traders or investors—like dispute resolution and transparent reporting—may not apply. Even if their product range seems comprehensive, with managed accounts, model portfolios, and goal-based solutions, the regulatory uncertainties cannot be overlooked. In my view, the “medium potential risk” and the specifically flagged “suspicious overrun” and “suspicious scope of business” further heighten the caution I'd exercise. Although the firm advertises tailored solutions and positive customer support, the low overall trust score, paired with a lapsed license, makes me hesitate to consider them fully reliable or secure. My conservative stance is to prioritize brokers with current, robust regulation. For those serious about safeguarding their capital, I recommend exercising caution with Shaw and Partners until their regulatory standing is rectified.

Broker Issues

Shaw and Partners

Regulation

06-06

Соединенные Штаты Америки