简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
RM80 Million in Losses After ‘Islamic’ Scheme Falls Apart
Abstract:A group of 232 investors is urging Malaysian authorities to launch a comprehensive investigation into an Islamic investment scheme that reportedly incurred losses exceeding RM80 million. The scheme, marketed under the guise of Islamic Redeemable Preference Shares (IRPS), is now under scrutiny for alleged misrepresentation and regulatory breaches.

More than 230 investors are asking authorities in Malaysia to investigate a company that ran what was claimed to be a Shariah-compliant investment scheme. The company is believed to have caused losses of at least RM80 million.
The Malaysian International Humanitarian Organisation (MHO) said the scheme looked legitimate at first. It used the name of a well-known Shariah adviser and appeared to follow Islamic financial principles. These factors gave many people confidence to invest.
MHO Secretary-General Datuk Hishamuddin Hashim said the company promoted Islamic Redeemable Preference Shares (IRPS) through marketing agents. The scheme was advertised as being in line with Islamic law. It had Shariah compliance certificates and submitted an official document, called an Information Memorandum (IM), to the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC).
Many investors believed that this meant the scheme was approved by the SC. However, this was not the case. Hishamuddin explained that submitting an IM does not mean the investment is approved, and that it is only allowed for “sophisticated investors”, that is for people with a net asset value of at least RM3 million and who invest a minimum of RM250,000.

In this case, many investors were ordinary people, not qualified under the law. Some invested as little as RM50,000, well below the legal threshold. This raises serious questions about whether the scheme was being offered in a way that broke the rules.
One of the agents who helped market the scheme, Datuk Seri Mahadi Badrul Zaman, said he too was a victim. He claimed to have lost more than RM20.7 million after investing in two of the involved companies.
Mahadi is also known for being the husband of actress Heliza Helmi. His name and his company, AUF MBZ Consortium Plt, were listed last year on the Securities Commission's investor alert list. The SC stated this was because of “unlicensed capital market activities” involving unlisted public company shares.
There is now growing pressure for regulators to take action. MHO wants a full investigation into the scheme, including the role of the Shariah adviser named in the documents. It also wants authorities to investigate whether false advertising and fraud were involved.
Hishamuddin said the case involves the public interest, as the victims include professionals from the oil and gas industry and well-known corporate figures. He urged the SC to open an official investigation and refer the case to the Attorney-Generals Chambers for possible charges.
Meanwhile, the controversy has gained attention on social media. Actress Fathia Latiff previously accused Mahadi of cheating her by failing to deliver a house she paid for five years ago.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Nattachai Chalermwat, MH Markets
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Apex Markets Review: Traders Outraged Over Withdrawal Denials & Other Trading Issues
Struggling to access fund withdrawals from Apex Markets for months? Does the broker remain silent on fund withdrawal issues? Does the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker reject your winning trades? Have you failed to get a refund into the card used for deposits? Did the broker deduct from your trading account instead? Traders have been imposing these scam allegations while sharing the Apex Markets Review online. We read the reviews and shared some of them below. Take a look!

tastyfx Exposed: Fund Losses, Trade Manipulation & Account Related Hassles Hurt Traders
Are fund losses normal for you at tastyfx? Does the US-based forex broker constantly manipulate prices to hit your trading experience? Do you fail to receive a reply from the broker on your fund withdrawal requests? Do you constantly face trading account issues with tastyfx? It’s time to read the tastyfx review shared by traders online.

Aron Groups Review: Fund Losses, High Commission & Trade Manipulation Keep Traders on Tenterhooks
Have you lost your hard-earned capital while trading via Aron Groups Broker? Has the high commission charged by the broker substantially reduced your trading profits? Does the Marshall Islands-based forex broker constantly manipulate spreads to widen your capital losses? Have you been lured into trading courtesy of Aron Groups No Deposit Bonus, only to find that you had to deposit capital to get a bonus? All these and many more trading issues have become synonymous with the experience of Aron Groups’ traders. Consequently, many traders have shared negative Aron Groups reviews online. In this article, we have shared some of their reviews.

