WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:CySEC warns investors about enfodns.com, ca-xe.pro, and six other unregistered sites. These platforms operate illegally and may pose a risk of fraud.

The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has issued a formal warning to investors, flagging eight online platforms that are offering investment services without the required regulatory authorization. The announcement, published on April 15, 2025, serves as a continued reminder of the growing risks posed by unlicensed financial websites targeting European users.
CySEC stated that the following websites are not authorized to provide investment services or conduct investment activities in accordance with Article 5 of Law 87 (I)/2017:
These entities are not listed in CySECs official register of authorized investment firms. As such, any activity conducted through these platforms is considered illegal under Cypriot law. While these websites may appear legitimate—often featuring professional layouts, customer support channels, and promotional claims—they operate outside the regulatory perimeter, exposing users to high risks of financial fraud.
CySEC has emphasized that engaging with unauthorized platforms may result in the complete loss of investor funds. Many such sites offer high-return promises or mimic well-known financial institutions, which further complicates detection by ordinary consumers. In some cases, the domain names are deliberately chosen to resemble those of regulated firms, a common tactic used in clone scams.
Although CySEC continues to publish regular updates and blacklist such domains, new websites frequently emerge under different names, making it difficult for investors to keep pace. This latest warning brings the number of flagged websites by CySEC this year alone to over 40.
To verify whether a financial entity is properly licensed, CySEC advises investors to consult its official website (www.cysec.gov.cy) before transferring any funds or sharing personal information. Regulatory databases are considered the most reliable method for confirming the legitimacy of an investment firm.
As fraudulent activities persist in the online investment space, investors are urged to perform thorough due diligence before engaging with any financial service provider. Tools like WikiFX, a global broker verification platform, can help users assess regulatory standing and avoid high-risk platforms.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.