Mazi Finance Scam Exposure: A Warning to Indian Traders
Latest India Mazi Finance scam: Failed XAUUSD execution despite margin, costing $675—fake “insufficient balance” excuse. Protect funds, read the full report now!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed charges against nine entities, including five individuals, for an alleged multimillion-dollar fraud scheme linked to pre-IPO investments, drawing in over 4,000 global investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has brought charges against five individuals and four entities allegedly involved in a substantial fraud scheme related to pre-initial public offering (IPO) investments. Among the accused are Raymond J. Pirrello, Jr., Marcello Follano, Robert Cassino, Anthony DiTucci, Joseph Rivera, and their respective companies. These defendants are believed to have engaged in deceptive practices that led to over $525 million in unregistered offerings.
These investments drew in more than 4,000 individuals globally, enticing them with promises of no upfront fees while covertly imposing undisclosed markups. This scheme resulted in illicit profits exceeding $88 million for the defendants and their associates.
As per the complaint, Sheldon Pollock, serving as the Associate Regional Director in the New York Regional Office, highlighted that the defendants allegedly marketed unregistered securities to investors, claiming no upfront fees while purportedly channelling tens of millions through undisclosed fees for their own gain.
The accused allegedly established an extensive network of unregistered sales agents who misled investors by falsely asserting the absence of upfront fees. In reality, investors faced substantial undisclosed markups, reaching as high as 150 percent, benefiting the defendants and their sales agents.
The individuals accused supposedly concealed Raymond J. Pirrello Jr.'s involvement, concealing his past SEC sanctions related to insider trading. The SEC's complaint, filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, levied multiple violations of antifraud, securities, and broker-dealer registration laws against the defendants. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, restitution of ill-gotten gains, and civil penalties.

In recent times, the SEC has intensified its pursuit of companies failing to register with the agency. In the previous month, the regulator initiated legal action against Kraken, a San Francisco-based crypto exchange, for allegedly operating unregistered services, encompassing securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency activities.
The charges involve claims of commingling customers funds and crypto assets with Kraken's own, echoing accusations against Binance and Coinbase. The SEC alleges Kraken operated as an exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency without the necessary registrations.
Kraken responded by denying accusations of fraud or market manipulation, asserting that none of the alleged funds were missing or misused. However, while Kraken did not dispute the allegation of commingling funds, it clarified that the SEC did not claim any missing or misused customer funds.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Latest India Mazi Finance scam: Failed XAUUSD execution despite margin, costing $675—fake “insufficient balance” excuse. Protect funds, read the full report now!

Does Pemaxx prevent you from withdrawing funds once you make profits? Has the Mauritius-based forex broker disabled your trading account upon your withdrawal request? Do you fail to withdraw funds despite meeting the trading lot requirements? These scam-like trading activities have allegedly become a part of the broker’s operation, as many traders have complained about them online. In this Pemaxx review article, we have highlighted their comments against the forex broker. Keep reading!

Did Fortune Prime Global deduct all your profits by accusing you of market manipulation? Are you struggling to access withdrawals for months? Has the forex broker disabled your forex trading account upon the withdrawal application? Does the broker stipulate tax payments as a condition for fund withdrawals? You are not alone! In this Fortune Prime Global review article, we have highlighted these complaints. Read on!

WikiFX is launching the "Safe Trade with WikiFX" exclusive interview series, featuring members of the WikiFX Elite Club. This series delivers in-depth industry insights on trading safety, the establishment of industry standards, and regional market dynamics, aiming to foster deeper understanding of local markets and jointly advance transparency across the industry.