简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FINRA Slaps $24M Fine on BofA Securities
Abstract:FINRA levies $24 million fine against BofA Securities for alleged spoofing and supervisory failures, unveiling ongoing regulatory scrutiny across financial markets.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has taken action against BofA Securities, imposing a significant fine of $24 million. This penalty comes as a result of the firm's alleged involvement in more than 700 instances of spoofing and associated supervisory shortcomings within the US Treasury secondary markets, spanning over a six-year period.
Spoofing, a practice involving deceptive orders to fabricate market activity, was reportedly employed by BofA Securities through two former traders in the US Treasury secondary markets from October 2014 to February 2021. The firm stands accused of engaging in 717 instances of spoofing during this time.
The Executive Vice President and Head of Enforcement at FINRA, Bill St. Louis, expressed concern, highlighting that spoofing undermines market transparency and integrity by distorting actual supply and demand. He emphasized that this action underscores FINRA's commitment to vigorously pursue firms involved in spoofing, including cross-product spoofing.
Throughout this duration, BofA Securities failed to establish and sustain a supervisory system capable of detecting spoofing activities in the US Treasury markets. Although a system was implemented by the company in November 2015, it remained inadequate until mid-2019, primarily detecting algorithmic spoofing and not manual manipulation by traders.

While BofA Securities has accepted FINRA's findings without admitting or denying the charges, it's worth noting that the company was previously fined $325,000 last year by FINRA for allegedly issuing inaccurate monthly reports for order execution.
The regulatory body disclosed that between January 2014 and February 2022, BofA Securities incorrectly reported order execution statistics for its two market centres, MLCO and MLIX. The company reportedly disregarded the requirement to present separate statistical information under Rule 605, leading to combined reports for both centres being published.
In a separate incident, Credit Suisse faced scrutiny when FINRA fined its US subsidiary $900,000 for deficiencies in regulatory reporting. The violations involved tardy trades and inaccurate reports from November 2015 to March 2023 on the Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine.
Earlier this year, Webull was subject to a $3 million penalty by FINRA. The focus was on the firm's oversight in onboarding options traders and the absence of adequate supervisory systems to identify and address customer complaints. This oversight led to the approval of roughly 9,000 unqualified traders, including more than 2,500 customers under 21 without the required options trading experience.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

CMS Prime Review: Traders Report Withdrawal Blocks, Fund Scams & Unprofessional Support
Is your CMS Prime forex trading experience financially distressing? Does the broker constantly deny you to withdraw your funds? Has the broker defaulted on swap charges? Has the CMS Prime scammed you at every stage of your forex journey with it? Do you also have to witness unprofessional behavior from the broker officials? Well, these trading issues have become headlines on the CMS Prime broker’s review platforms. We have shared some complaints in this CMS Prime review article. Read on!

BingX Review: Traders Angry Over Withdrawal Denials, Account Blocks & More
Are BingX officials with you when you lose your trade? Do these officials apply restrictions on withdrawals as you earn profits? Do you lose access to BingX com login after earning profits? Does the US-based forex broker block your trading account in such situations? Failing to get key trading data access from the broker? These issues have been affecting many traders at BingX. In this BingX review article, we have shared some complaints. Take a look!

TD Markets Exposed: Price Manipulation, Withdrawal Issues & False Promises Hurt Traders
Is your winning trade converted into a loss upon closing it at TD Markets due to heavy price manipulation? Is withdrawing funds too much of a hassle at this South Africa-based forex broker? Does even the customer support fail to respond to your withdrawal requests? Have you been defrauded on the promise of zero commission upon withdrawal? Have you failed to close the trade due to the systemic issue at TD Markets? You are not alone! Many traders have commented while sharing the negative TD Markets review. We have shared some of them in this article. Take a look!

Uniglobe Markets Review 2025: A Safe Broker or a High-Risk Scam?
When looking at a broker, the most important question is always about safety: "Is Uniglobe Markets Safe Or Scam?" After carefully studying how it operates and its regulatory status, the answer is clear. Uniglobe Markets works without any proper financial regulation from a trusted authority. This fact alone is the biggest warning sign for any potential investor. This lack of oversight gets worse when you add the multiple official warnings from financial regulators across Europe and a pattern of serious problems reported by users, especially with withdrawals. This review will give you a detailed, fact-based look at these important points, breaking down what the broker offers and the risks involved to help you make a smart decision.
