简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Fundrise Sued by SEC
Abstract:In the midst of growing regulatory scrutiny on financial influencers and their interactions with investment platforms, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has accused Fundrise Advisors, LLC of violating cash solicitation rules by enlisting social media influencers to attract clients without providing requisite disclosures, reflecting a broader trend of global regulatory efforts addressing such practices.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has levelled allegations against Fundrise Advisors, LLC, asserting that the Washington-based investment advisory firm contradicted the nation's regulations pertaining to cash solicitation. The SEC disclosed this Tuesday that Fundrise Advisors engaged over 200 social media influencers and digital newsletter publishers to actively attract clients to its investment platform in a manner that did not encompass the necessary compliance with required disclosures as mandated by the law.
A focal point of the SEC's observations was Fundrise's informational brochure, which was lacking in the specified disclosures. Notably, the contractual arrangement between the investment company and the influencers conspicuously omitted any reference to these essential disclosures. Nevertheless, the regulatory body acknowledged that Fundrise had reached an accord to bring closure to the case by agreeing to remit a civil penalty amounting to $250,000.

Moreover, in tandem with this resolution, the SEC has reported that Fundrise has consented to both a cease-and-desist directive and a formal censure. However, it is important to note that the company neither admitted to nor refuted the regulator's findings.
Elaborating on the details, the SEC expounded, “Fundrise consented to the entry of the SEC's order finding that the firm willfully violated the compliance and former cash solicitation provisions of Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rules 206(4)-3 and 206(4)-7 thereunder.”
Recently, regulatory bodies across major global financial markets have turned their gaze toward what has become known as 'finfluencers'—financial technology influencers. Last month, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom unveiled its intent to fortify measures against unauthorized and non-compliant financial promotions. Concurrently, the FCA intends to refine its guidelines for social media use, aiming to ensure more effective adherence when financial entities publicize their products or services online.
This thematic concern extends beyond the U.K. Partnering with prominent social media influencer Sharon Gaffka and the FCA collaborated with the Advertising Standards Authority to launch a campaign discouraging 'finfluencers' from endorsing illicit 'get rich quick' schemes. Similarly, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission embarked on an investor protection initiative in response to promoting intricate and high-risk investment products through social media, often endorsed by celebrities. This campaign raised questions regarding the 'gamification' of retail investments.
Parallelly, as early as 2021, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) sounded a cautionary note against 'finfluencers', underscoring that many were dispensing unlicensed financial counsel within the nation. ASIC emphasized that only entities and individuals holding an Australian Financial Services (AFS) license were sanctioned to provide financial advice to investors.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Charles Schwab Review: Traders Claim Illegitimate Profit Cancellation, Trade Manipulation & More
Have you been lured into the Charles Schwab app for trading on the back of outrageous profit claims by the broker? Did you fail to receive any of these? Does the broker deny withdrawals every time you request and cancel your forex trading account? Have you been victimized financially by its trade manipulation? Act before you are left with a NIL balance in your account. Many traders have questioned Charles Schwab customer service and many other operational executives for the aforementioned illegitimate trading activities. In this Charles Schwab review article, we have shared some of their comments. Read on!

AMP Futures Exposed: Traders Raise Alarms Over Illegitimate Account Blocks & Bad Customer Service
Has AMP Futures blocked your forex trading account? Does it fail to provide any explanation for this act? Do you face issues concerning deposits to your AMP Futures account? Is the customer service non-existent for any trading query you raise with it? You are not alone! Many traders have been facing these issues upon AMP Futures login. Some of them have commented on AMP Futures review platforms. In this article, we have shared some reviews that you can look at. Read on!

FXGlory Review: Vanishing Profits, Capital Scams & Withdrawal Charges Keep Annoying Traders
Does FXGlory remove all your forex trading account balances upon fund withdrawal requests? Or do you witness incorrect trading account balances after fund withdrawals? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker charge you for fund withdrawals? All these and many more scam-related complaints have been filed against the forex broker. In this FXGlory review article, we will discuss several complaints. Read on!

PINAKINE Broker Review: A Complete Look at Its Services and Risks
Finding a trustworthy broker from the huge and often confusing world of online trading options is one of the biggest challenges a trader faces. In this competitive market, PINAKINE Liquidity Limited has appeared, getting attention with promises of high leverage and zero-commission trading. However, a closer look shows important factors that every potential client must think about before investing. The most important thing to consider with PINAKINE is that it has no regulation. This fact completely changes how risky the broker is and has major effects on how safe your investments will be. This review gives a complete and fair examination based on information available to the public. We will break down its services, trading conditions, platform technology, and the possible risks involved, helping you make a fully informed decision.

